The rule in question is meant to reduce leaking, venting and flaring of
methane from drilling activity on federal land.
Not exact matches
This resulted in a range of policies —
from the Clean Power Plan to
methane regulations for oil and gas
drilling — that now face uncertainty or complete rescindment.
«Greenhouse gas emissions are going to go through the roof with a project of this kind,» said Wilderness Committee National Campaign Director Joe Foy «
From escaped methane at the drill sites to the massive carbon emissions required to cool the gas, to more escaped methane on the long trip across the ocean to Asia and then the emissions from burning the
From escaped
methane at the
drill sites to the massive carbon emissions required to cool the gas, to more escaped
methane on the long trip across the ocean to Asia and then the emissions
from burning the
from burning the gas.
The gas did not match the shallower
methane that the gas industry says is naturally occurring in water, a signal that the contamination was related to
drilling and was less likely to have come
from drilling waste spilled above ground.
«The
methane emissions
from the gas wells... are surprisingly high considering that all of these wells were still being
drilled, had not yet been hydraulically fractured, and were not yet in production,» the paper reports.
Last spring, the EPA doubled its estimates of
methane gas leaked
from drilling equipment and said the amount of
methane pollution that billows
from fracking operations was 9,000 times higher than researchers had previously thought.
Another coalition of environmental groups has sued the U.S. Bureau of Land Management to reverse a two - year delay of another
methane rule, this one governing emissions
from drilling on federal and Indian lands.
Environmental controls designed to prevent leaks of
methane from newly
drilled natural gas wells are effective, a study has found — but emissions
from existing wells in production are much higher than previously believed.
Fracking has already drawn considerable scrutiny
from environmental groups, unhappy homeowners, and teams of lawyers who blame the
drilling method for polluting pristine rivers, turning bucolic farmlands into noisy industrial zones, and leaking enough
methane to make ordinary tap water as flammable as lighter fluid.
During Tuesday's hearing, for instance, Zinke told Sen. John Barrasso he would support the Wyoming Republican's effort to scrap a recently finalized BLM rule to limit
methane waste
from oil and gas
drilling.
This does not include the concerns that
methane escaping
from drilling nor burned off in flaring are also contributing to global warming.
Fossil
methane that leaks naturally
from these sites — «geologic
methane» — has an isotope signature that's identical to the fossil
methane emitted when humans
drill gas wells.
But the new Purdue study suggests the EPA's inventories may not be quantifying all the
methane emissions
from wells being
drilled because few people have measured
methane leaking
from wells in the earliest stage of well development — the actual
drilling itself.
The EPA estimated in 2011 that natural gas
drilling accounts for about 1,200 gigagrams, or 2.6 billion pounds, of
methane emissions each year
from well completions, equipment leaks and pneumatic controllers.
However, the stark reality is that global emissions have accelerated (Fig. 1) and new efforts are underway to massively expand fossil fuel extraction [7]--[9] by
drilling to increasing ocean depths and into the Arctic, squeezing oil
from tar sands and tar shale, hydro - fracking to expand extraction of natural gas, developing exploitation of
methane hydrates, and mining of coal via mountaintop removal and mechanized long - wall mining.
The study shows that during
drilling, as much as 34 grams of
methane per second were spewing into the air
from seven natural gas well pads in southwest Pennsylvania — up to 1,000 times the EPA estimate for
methane emissions during
drilling, Purdue atmospheric chemistry professor and study lead author Paul Shepson said in a statement.
While Price is not expecting any time soon a mission to Mars to
drill several hundred meters beneath the surface, methanogens (
methane - generating Archaea) could just as easily be detected around meteor craters where rock has been thrown up
from deep underground.
One option alluded to earlier in these pages could be citizen patrols to check for
methane leaks
from natural gas facilities:
drilling operations, compressing stations or pipelines.
That's why a great deal of attention was paid last week to the results of a two - day aerial survey over gas fields in southwestern Pennsylvania that calculated emission rates of
methane (the main component of natural gas)
from two well pads still in the
drilling phase.
Original post In 2011, a Cornell research team led by the environmental scientist Robert Howarth published «
Methane and the greenhouse - gas footprint of natural gas
from shale formations,» a widely discussed paper positing that gas escaping
from drilling operations using hydraulic fracturing, widely known as fracking, made natural gas a bigger climate threat than the most infamous fossil fuel, coal.
Coal bed
methane is produced
from many wells specifically
drilled for that purpose in the area, with about 12 billion cubic feet produced in 2012 in Greene and Washington counties.
Researchers
from Duke University say they have found a clear link between gas
drilling in Pennsylvania and Upstate New York and high levels of flammable
methane in drinking water — a situation that became a prominent talking point in the
drilling debate after flaming faucets were featured in the documentary «Gasland.»
A Twitter comment on
methane leakage
from gas operations reminded me to add a note about another ripe opportunity for citizens to track gas leaks
from drilling operations, compressing stations or pipelines: Raise money for some infrared cameras and then survey your region periodically.
According to the briefing,
methane migration
from gas
drilling, had «caused or contributed to» at least six explosions that killed four people and injured three others over the course of the decade preceding full - scale Marcellus development.
The problem, as is noted in Howarth's paper, is the huge amount of guesswork behind estimates of gas emissions
from this (or any other) form of natural gas
drilling and the subjectivity of interpretations of the greenhouse influence of such emissions (which are nearly all
methane, a potent but short - lived heat - trapping gas).
Re: # 3, a big difference between horizontal
drilling to exploit coal - bed
methane production (which is what I think you mean) and EGS is that in CBM, the valuable item is the gas, not the water, which comes both
from surface sources, and
from the natural gas / coal resource.
Most studies have shown that more than half of the
methane leakage
from natural gas comes
from drilling sites and gas processing plants (i.e. upstream emissions), with the remainder coming
from pipelines and storage systems (i.e. downstream emission).
Methane — a primary component of natural gas — leaks
from drilling sites and pipelines.
Shakhova, Semiletov and collaborators
from 12 institutions in five countries plan to continue their studies in the region, tracking the source of the
methane emissions and
drilling into the seafloor in an effort to estimate how much
methane is stored there.
Now they have spotted something else
from space: large plumes of fugitive
methane gas liberated
from these formations by unconventional extraction methods like horizontal
drilling and hydraulic fracturing.
The reality is stark: fracking is believed to cause earthquakes, groundwater contamination, adds to greenhouse gas pollution through releases of
methane, releases uranium and radon radiation, and leads to serious air pollution
from the emissions spewing
from drilling and transportation equipment.
Using an airplane to detect greenhouse gas emissions
from freshly
drilled shale gas wells in Pennsylvania's Marcellus basin, Cornell and Purdue scientists have found that leaked
methane is a tougher problem — between a hundred - and a thousandfold — than previously thought, according to a study published April 14 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
About a third of the human budget comes
from fossil fuel exploration, where
methane leaks
from oil and gas wells during
drilling, the researchers said in a press release.
Methane emissions that occur during
drilling and
from pipeline leaks also add to the so - called green house gas effect.
Indeed, when
methane leakage
from drilling and infrastructure is factored in, natural gas doesn't look much like a climate hero at all.
Included in life cycle carbon are substantial
methane leaks
from natural gas production and pipelines, the energy for
drilling, mining, transport, refining, and disposal that are much more significant for fossil fuels and nuclear energy than for renewables.
In preparation for the project, two new wells were
drilled to serve as the collection point for
methane from the mine.
One released in 2013 found that
methane emissions
from natural gas
drilling were a fraction of previous estimates.
Similarly the
methane stuff is also flypaper for wackos — but more
from the horrible - we're - all - gonna - die side (and, you know I'm suspicious they're being set up by the emergency drumbeat used by the gas industry that's already ramping up to
drill for gas in the Arctic, particularly in Russia; it's a two - for - one if they can get some kind of credit or payment for «alleviating the
methane emergency» and sell the gas too.
Indeed, throughout the long oil and gas history of the Appalachian Mountains, where the world's first oil well was
drilled in 1859,
drillers have known of «shows» of gas
from the shale, brief blasts that would blow
methane - charged water out of the hole, or tangle the
drilling lines.
«Carbon dioxide comes
from combusting fossil fuels, and
methane comes
from natural and industrial sources, including the large amounts that are released during oil and gas
drilling,» Walke says.
Methane, which comes
from the stomachs of cattle and sheep,
from thawing tundra,
from food rotting in landfill and
from drilling for oil and mining, is a greenhouse gas that is much more dangerous than carbon dioxide.
From their fishing boat, the researchers
drilled into the bed of the Laptev Sea — a hotspot of
methane emissions — and used sonar to analyse gas bubbles in the water.
EPA says emissions
from field production of natural gas accounted for 32.2 percent of
methane emissions
from natural gas systems in 2012, but adds that those have come down more than 25 percent since 1990 — which is noteworthy when you factor in that natural gas production ramped up with the introduction of advanced fracking and horizontal
drilling in the mid-2000s.
Dig deep, they hide their conclusion, which seems invariably to be, bless our
drilling operation, credit us with saving the world
from the
methane monster by making money faster than ever by building more
drilling and processing and pipeline infrastructure, by committing money and effort to keeping the dinosaur alive a little longer.
From the press release: «During field expeditions, the research team used a variety of techniques — including sonar and visual images of
methane bubbles in the water, air and water sampling, seafloor
drilling and temperature readings — to determine the conditions of the water and permafrost, as well as the amount of
methane being released.»
Methane concentrations were 17 - times higher on average (19.2 mg CH4 L - 1) in shallow wells
from active
drilling and extraction areas than in wells
from nonactive areas (1.1 mg L - 1 on average; P < 0.05; Fig. 3 and Table 1).
As the editor of the trade paper Marcellus
Drilling News put it, «the only fugitive
methane of any significance is the stuff emanating
from these two.»
Further evidence for the difference between
methane from water wells near active
drilling sites and neighboring nonactive sites is the relationship of
methane concentration to δ13C - CH4 values (Fig. 4A) and the ratios of
methane to higher - chain hydrocarbons versus δ13C - CH4 (Fig. 4B).
The
methane produced by the burning of biomass, like wood, contains more of the heavier isotope (carbon - 13) relative to the lighter isotope (carbon - 12), than
methane which is produced in wetlands,» explains Professor Thomas Blunier, Centre for Ice and Climate at the Niels Bohr Institute at the University of Copenhagen.The researchers have measured the isotopic composition of the
methane in ice cores that are
drilled up
from the Greenland ice cap at the NEEM project in northwestern Greenland.