Not exact matches
The coherence of the argument (not a closed one, like a system of logic, but open, like a
method or key
to progressive research) is such that I believe only solid, positive reasons can
lead to its
rejection; and for my part I can see none that is adequate.
Findings of a three - year clinical trial
led by University of Cincinnati (UC) transplant researchers suggest that a novel pre-operative drug therapy reduces antibodies in kidney patients with greater success than with traditional
methods, with the potential
to increase the patients» candidacy for kidney transplantation and decrease the likelihood of organ
rejection.
This is particularly true of conspiracies over scientific and medical issues where conspiratorial ideation can
lead to outright opposition
to and
rejection of the scientific
method [3].
Grimes is wrong
to say that conspiracy theories about vaccines
lead to either «opposition
to» or «
rejection of» the scientific
method.