Not exact matches
Lutheran
theology's antinomian tendency makes it perhaps more vulnerable
than the other Reformation traditions in spite of the countervailing forces of its sociology and its doctrinal tradition, although here and there an older
methodology, which understands that the Gospel does not negate the commandments, lives side by side with neo-Lutheranism and makes possible at least a tentative no to the likes of the task force.
There can be no doubt that there will be more dissent and more pluralism in the church
than there have been in the past, and that there will be more gray areas
than ever before, especially since the
methodology, as well as the subject matter, of contemporary
theology points in this direction.
A third danger to evangelical
theology brought on by inadequate reflection at the point of
methodology is
theology's tendency to reflect current opinion rather
than Biblical truth.
My general point is why we fiter that age thru a presupposed
theology, rather
than apply some consistent «historical
methodology» to it and then infer a workable
theology for our present age.That's what I meant by theological history trumping historical
theology?