Sentences with phrase «microphysics for»

Tonttila, J., Maalick, Z., Raatikainen, T., Kokkola, H., Kühn, T., and Romakkaniemi, S.: UCLALES — SALSA v1.0: a large - eddy model with interactive sectional microphysics for aerosol, clouds and precipitation, Geosci.

Tonttila, J., Maalick, Z., Raatikainen, T., Kokkola, H., Kühn, T., and Romakkaniemi, S.: UCLALES — SALSA v1.0: a large - eddy model with interactive sectional microphysics for aerosol, clouds and precipitation, Geosci.

Not exact matches

Also a Fellow of the American Physical Society, Hammel received the Los Alamos Fellows Prize in 1995 for his frequently cited work elucidating the microphysics of copper - based high - temperature superconductors.

For orographic cumulus clouds, the G - 1 measurements will characterize in - cloud dynamics, microphysics, and aerosols, as well as the environmental variability around the clouds focusing on conditions upstream and downstream of clouds at multiple altitudes in the vicinity of the AMF1 site.

For those of you who know what Coulumb's law is — this may strike you as not so hard to understand, but for those who don't know what a static field is, well, it's going to be hard to understand, but that QBO was during this past month at a record negative reading, and that, IMHO, is indicative of very specific conditions where capactive couplings could and did occur to impact cloud microphysics propertiFor those of you who know what Coulumb's law is — this may strike you as not so hard to understand, but for those who don't know what a static field is, well, it's going to be hard to understand, but that QBO was during this past month at a record negative reading, and that, IMHO, is indicative of very specific conditions where capactive couplings could and did occur to impact cloud microphysics propertifor those who don't know what a static field is, well, it's going to be hard to understand, but that QBO was during this past month at a record negative reading, and that, IMHO, is indicative of very specific conditions where capactive couplings could and did occur to impact cloud microphysics properties.

For the disciplinary matrix of climate science, no one source is sufficient, but it should include some of the books I have commented on before: «Modern Thermodynamics» by Kondepudi and Prigogine; «Thermal Physics of the Atmosphere» by Ambaum; «Thermodynamics, Kinetics, and Microphysics of Clouds» by Khvorostyanov and Curry (that is a thick, dense, tough slog, let me warn you!)

The meeting will mainly cover the following themes, but can include other topics related to understanding and modelling the atmosphere: ● Surface drag and momentum transport: orographic drag, convective momentum transport ● Processes relevant for polar prediction: stable boundary layers, mixed - phase clouds ● Shallow and deep convection: stochasticity, scale - awareness, organization, grey zone issues ● Clouds and circulation feedbacks: boundary - layer clouds, CFMIP, cirrus ● Microphysics and aerosol - cloud interactions: microphysical observations, parameterization, process studies on aerosol - cloud interactions ● Radiation: circulation coupling; interaction between radiation and clouds ● Land - atmosphere interactions: Role of land processes (snow, soil moisture, soil temperature, and vegetation) in sub-seasonal to seasonal (S2S) prediction ● Physics - dynamics coupling: numerical methods, scale - separation and grey - zone, thermodynamic consistency ● Next generation model development: the challenge of exascale, dynamical core developments, regional refinement, super-parametrization ● High Impact and Extreme Weather: role of convective scale models; ensembles; relevant challenges for model development

«Derivation of physical and optical properties of mid-latitude cirrus ice crystals for a size - resolved cloud microphysics model.»

The three models are the result of varying a single parameter that controls the amount of cloud water required for the onset of coalescence in the models microphysics scheme, which in turn controls the water content of clouds.

«Some other models like CESM1 did include microphysics and an indirect aerosol effect, and had slightly lower 20th Century warming than observed... yet its climate sensitivity is higher than for [some other models that don't include the indirect aerosol effect]... the [GWPF] comment presumes that models have been tuned to reproduce the 20th Century temperature record, but this is mostly not true»

Despite the simplicity of this idea, which entirely neglects detailed microphysics and other small - scale processes, such models accurately reproduce the observed water vapor distribution for the mid and upper troposphere (3, 4).