«I read (Nick Clegg's interview) in the Guardian that we were going to look at
middle class child benefit.
Not exact matches
Look a the progressive things we've coming forward with — the Canada
Child Benefit, the
middle -
class tax cut, the investments in affordable housing, the investments in early learning.»
We made it clear we need to make significant investments in infrastructure and
middle -
class families, so we talked about reducing the tax rate for
middle -
class families and increasing the
child tax
benefit to deal with the rising costs and anxieties.
The Liberal's recently announced «Canada
Child Benefit» and «
Middle Class Tax Cut» are largely funded by eliminating Conservative tax cuts and by the by the introduction of a new high - income tax rate of 33 percent.
«At the time, people looked at our plan for more generous and means - tested
child benefits, tax increases for the rich and tax cuts for the
middle class as a bit of a curiosity,» he said, according to a copy of his remarks.
There are good political and social reasons behind making pre-K available to everyone, including the
benefits to all
children of socioeconomic integration and the fact that
middle -
class voters are more likely to be invested in programs that aren't narrowly targeted at the poor.
«Working collaboratively with the Broome County Promise Zone, those interested in serving as mentors will be matched with
children in schools that are part of CCPA's University - assisted community school effort, which aims to level the playing field for students from low - income families who lack some of the supports for academic success from which
children from
middle -
class families
benefit,» Bronstein said.
On 25 November 2010, a week after the announcement of his intended peerage, Flight provoked controversy by suggesting that the government's cuts to
child benefits would «discourage the
middle classes from breeding» - a politically charged term in discussions on
class - «but for those on
benefits there is every incentive».
Child benefit should be scrapped to cut the amount of the welfare budget going to
middle classes, a think tank has recommended.
The article «quoted» a «senior source» in government as saying: ««We looked into who would be adversely affected by scrapping the # 87 a month
child benefit for
middle class families and realised pretty quickly that it was Oddbins and Majestic».
The major policy announcement on free school meals was the obvious move in this direction — as well as being a sop to
middle class voters who lost out after cuts to
child benefit — but Nick Clegg's speech is full of references to policies which help in day - to - day life: the pupil premium, flexible parental leave, free childcare, a cap on social care costs.
After a day of partisan bickering over whether the Republicans» sweeping tax plan would truly help the
middle class, a key House panel approved late changes, restoring the tax exemption for employees receiving
child care
benefits from their companies, but also putting new requirements on a tax credit used by working people of modest means.
• Short - term savings from cutting the
middle class out of state
benefits as Nick Clegg suggests on
child benefit (Britain needs «savage» cuts, says Clegg, 19 September) would weaken public support for the social safety net on which the poorest depend and ultimately endanger the future of the welfare state itself.
• What I've picked up from the Liberal Democrat conference so far is that Nick Clegg wants to cut the pay of classroom assistants, home helps, lollipop men and women and other low - paid public sector workers, to means test
middle -
class mums to decide whether they deserve
child benefit, and to keep tuition fees.
Iain Duncan Smith has, for some time, wanted to base the extra # 10billion cuts needed from his budget on changing universal
benefits so that the
middle classes and higher earners do not receive unjustified handouts (
child benefit for higher earners, for example), rather than balance his budget on the backs of the poor and vulnerable.
The Sunday Times warns Cameron not to neglect the
middle classes: «Instead of wooing the
middle classes, [Conservatives] now talk of removing
benefits such as
child trust funds,
child tax credits and Sure Start
children's centres.
The evidence is clear that
middle -
class children can
benefit substantially and that
benefits outweigh the costs for
children from
middle - income as well as those from low - income families.
In other words, any new funding for preschool education must
benefit middle -
class children if it is to gain their parents» political backing.
But vouchers would not, in Illich's view, offer poor
children those
benefits that truly set
middle -
class children apart: the conversation of educated people, books in the home, travel.
Upper -
middle class and wealthy parents do not need universal preschool options, on average, but low - income
children may substantially
benefit from these programs.
The stark contrast between those at the very bottom and everybody else is important because decades of academic research have shown that
children from low - income families who attend pre-K
benefit immensely, but those
benefits decrease as you move up the income ladder and may even disappear beyond the
middle class.
... Significant
benefits [also] accrue to
children from
middle -
class households, but at considerably lower levels of magnitude.
A recent study of Boston's universal pre-K program provides additional evidence that pre-K programs have
benefits greater than costs for
children from
middle -
class families.
The parents who mailed in all those applications believe that the new Wayne school will have a more motivated staff than most city schools (300 teachers applied for 14 jobs), that it will
benefit from its association with the university, that it will be a magnet for philanthropy (before opening it had attracted $ 575,000 in corporate donations), that it will be smaller (city
middle schools have 600 to 1,000 students) and have smaller
classes (25 students versus 35 for city
middle schools), and that it will demand more from their
children.
Middle -
class black families
benefited most from the Brown ruling because it gave them the opportunity to move to white neighborhoods and put their
children in better schools, said Baum, a professor in the urban studies and planning program at the University of Maryland, College Park.
For a bill that the G.O.P. is trying to market as a «boon» to the
middle class, the House bill does not just tax graduate student tuition waivers, but also it takes aim at tuition
benefits for higher education employees and their
children.
Enhancement to the federal
child tax
benefit — which will cost the government almost $ 3 billion this year — is just one of an array of financial goodies Canada's three major political parties are rolling out to woo coveted
middle -
class voters.