Why don't we go in with a 20
mil deal for dzeko.it would be a huge steal
Say they extend him during next season and he takes the 4/44
mil deal.
Give him time and see if he can play up to the 8
mil deal.
Not exact matches
MIL HK is approved to engage in
dealing in securities and asset management - regulated activities and may provide certain investment services to «professional investors» as defined in the Securities and Futures Ordinance («SFO»).
MIL HK is approved to engage in
dealing in securities and asset management regulated activities and may provide certain investment services to «professional investors» as defined in the Securities and Futures Ordinance («SFO»).
I agree with you as apparently close to a
deal with Chelsea for # 35
mil just as he is showing good form for us all over the pitch.
Surely he still wants to play first team football and if Arsenal gets few
mils for that
deal then its a win - win situation.
The Cowboys settle for taking Anthony Hitchens in the 4th, who just signed a 9
mil a year
deal with KC, again dead on.
We'll still have Allen, LeVert and even Whitehead on rookie
deals, and hopefully Harris for around $ 6
mil
If I remember right Liverpool spent 35
mil on Carroll in what is now recognized as one of the worst
deals in their history.
Anyways, wasn't Mustafi
deal # 35
mils with PLAUSIBLE add ons?
If BVB could jump on a transfer to Liverpool and grab Emre Can with a transfer
deal in the winter transfer season + bulk cash $ 50
mil + bonuses.
On the one hand, you had a guy wanting $ 10
mil and infamously wore a Castro t - shirt which was a concern for the Miami front office, and on the other you had a guy wanting $ 10
mil who the head coach is personally asking for having produced the guy's career best year only 2 years ago as his offensive coordinator to come into a system he would know a good
deal of already.
A couple of years ago Higain even came to London for a medical and Wenger still backed out of the
deal because of the 32
mil asking price.
That said, if a team offers more than 9
mil on a long term
deal he is gone.
So if we do buy Benzema at 45
mil keep in mind his 180k 5 year
deal will cost 46.8
mil.
(Something like that) for 9.5
mil with 4 Croatia caps approved as an «exceptional talent», so Ithink wwe're confident of a
deal going through — but we're doing it with time left in the window as any appeal takes a week to process.
So let's just say for arguments sake the
deal is 2 years $ 30 million with $ 10
mil guaranteed, are we still interested?
I'm hoping that Farmer has a 3 or 4 year
deal worth around 5
mil a year on the table for him and is going to leave it at that.
I agree with Theo and the others, but Gibbs should be sold for nothing less than 14 million, and chambers if sold I would like a buy back clause in the
deal and a min of 20
mil for that kid as i don't think harry or keane are miles ahead of him.
Morata is not a proven talent, and at 51
mil would definitely not be a
deal.
If Ivan Gazidis was a better CEO then AFC wouldn't be earning over # 75
mil a year less than UTD from the shirt / stadium / kit sponsorship
deals and we could afford 1 more marquee signing.
Dealing beaten Anyone notice where our four
mil a year dman was on that second goal.
They probably could have had Keenum for 10
mil on a longer term
deal right now had they signed Keenum a year or two ago.
25
mil for a 30 year old CM in the prem is a great
deal, you're delusional to suggest 35 +
mil is at all feasible for Cazorla... we paid 16
mil for a 27 year old with 40 + Spanish caps so how is he worth more than double that at 30?
I think the cech
deal is all but sealed now, as for which one goes out looks likely to be chezzer on loan.Just hearing that podolski is on his way to turkey for 1.5
mil would of thought we would at least get closer to 6
mil for him any I wish him good luck
Everyone thought it was a done
deal but Wenger backed out because of the asking price (I believe 32
mil).
I don't think 50
mil would be a good
deal, he's not worth that much but in today's market and the lack of availability of strikers we should just pay that amount and get our man.
You said bid
deals, please explain how Kallstrom and Flamini on a free along with squad players Welbeck and Perez for under # 20
mil we're big
deals?
Chelsea are said to be willing to part with Remy, and I think Wenger might believe a good
deal for Remy is a good option compared to a forty
mil outlay on Lacazette.
If the board agrees to pay 8
mils for his salary (which in fact is only 6, the other two are sponsorship and other
deals) then I don't see why this is a problem.
60
mil would be a great
deal.
And us fans would still call Lukaku a bargain if we managed that
deal XD If they wasn't HG then we would have to offer those 3 plus at least # 30
mil lol.
Right before we signed Ozil we bid 38 odd
mil for him which would have broken our transfer record at the time... It was a very publicized potential
deal and Draxler was even caught on film with a fan saying I'm coming to Arsenal.
Joe Harris in the 3rd or 4th year of a 7 or 8
mil per
deal.
Julius Thomas Antonio Gates: This would be my choice, 1 - 2 yr
deal for 1 - 2
mil a yr Brent Celek Marcedes Lewis Anthony Fasano Zach Miller
Oh, and they have to sign Mark Stone this offseason, who should command north of $ 6
mil, and they have their owner's internal cap to
deal with.
Also Reggie just gave Ellis $ 6
mil guaranteed and a 3 year
deal assuming he would do what Vea would be asked to do which is eat up blocks and free up Mack and the LBs to make plays.
I thought 24
mil for 30 yr old rvp soon out of contract albeit still firing on all cylinders was a very shrewd
deal considering the rapid drop in resale value after he left.
This would be a terrible
deal, Higuain is really not that much better than giroud, and certainly not worth an additional $ 50
mil
The funds that those sales could bring in could largely be spent now, so if the estimated income from X player sales should be # 100
mil, spend # 75
mil of that now from the cash reserves and then work hard on recouping that money from the average that needs to go... Values was an example and not what I think they are worth XD That area could also
deal with contracts, take the pay structure away from the manager and into the club, ensure we do not have this issue again when a new manager feels it is the right direction and has no one to stop him.
Sky sports - Man city have removed themselves from the Sanchez
deal as the current
deals on the table for sanchez would cost more than the 60
mil they offered in summer.
May be a good
deal for 30 - 40
mil considering last season, But this is just pure madness!!
If we get that 70
mils for Sanchez without anyone in return and splash over half of that on Mahrez, trust me, we will the losers of those
deals.
What if we could strike a
deal with PSG, they buy Alexis for # 50
mil and we can buy Verratti for # 50
mil?
Auba is at Colney having medical and a new
deal for Giroud to Chelsea at # 18
mil has been agreed.
18
mil for any big nations top prospect is a good
deal, it doesn't mean that the future first teamer will not arrive from somewhere else it just means it's a good punt.
And if not a 3 year then a 2 year reconstruct
deal at 3
mil at year with a 2
mil incentive bonus broken up over 2 years.
the Falcons FO will bring him in on a 1 year prove it
deal or at the most a 2 - 3 year
deal for about 6 - 9
mil a year.
Hearing Bulls swingman Jimmy Butler is leaning strongly toward taking the five - year, $ 90
mil max Chicago offered as opposed to shorter
deal