Sentences with phrase «mil on»

And as an added touch, offer to accompany your MIL on doctors visits whenever possible.

Tsb 11720 mil on with dtc p0711, p2610, p0171, p0172 → Chevrolet car repair questions and answers from expert → Pcm chevy buick pontiac oldsmobile greatautohelp → Service stabilitrak, service traction control, and reduced → Ford raptor recalls tsb's ssm's f150 svt raptor forums → P0496 — evaporative emission (evap) system high purge →

- MIL on (with DTC P0108 — manifold absolute pressure sensor circuit high may have been set active or stored with the 3.6 L engine... this involves 2012 vehicles only).

If a 2013 Volkswagen Passat shows a MIL on with DTCs P0410, P0411 or P1423, this may be caused by a broken or cracked vacuum hose due to temperature variations.

And if you're showing off at the country club, those hints that you dropped a cool quarter - mil on your Bentley coupe may be worth the heavier driving dynamics.

Some 2011 - 2012 Ford F - 150 trucks equipped with the 3.5 L gasoline turbocharged direct injection (GTDI) engine and built on or before 5/24/2012 may exhibit an intermittent MIL on with DTC P0234.

If you've just cleaned the throttle body but now have an MIL on with DTC P2279 (intake air system leak), MIL on with P0507 (idle control system rpm higher than expected) and / or a fluctuating idle, it's likely that the throttle plate is now in a different position from the one that the ECM / PCM had learned.

Locked in a bidding war with Fox Searchlight, Harvey ended up spending the full ten mil on the picture, only to see it die on release that October, the film taking under $ 2 million.

When you invest 4.5 mil on an election you want to win and they may mean a court battle if this one is close.

Schedule an informal photo session of the generations for 4 days after the baby is born (on Day 3 the mother usually has a rough day because of the hormones, so you probably shouldn't see your MIL on Day 3).

We were actually a part - time cloth diaper family, as my son stays with my MIL on Tuesdays and Thursdays and she wouldn't agree to CD «ing.

Who are great players, but we need to be spending that 20 + mil on David Villa, 20 + mil on Cambiasso.

however, for a price of 25 to 30 mil on a 27 years who will have no sale on value.

United's group is by no means a breeze — Shaktar lost some great players in the summer but spent 60 mil on replacements.

If Sabatini has made up his mind to spend 20 + mil on a new forward then get one who can actually play alongside Totti in Rudi's 4 -3-3.

Agree with a lot of what you say, but... who on earth is going to spend ten mil on Robbie Keane?

So if we take the # 20 mil on offer it can be put towards Malcom, if he is willing to come.

I doubt Wenger will be given enough to spend # 35 ish mil on each of those as that would be around # 175mil... Also CF do go for more so... It could be up to # 200mil (# 60mil for CF) on 5 players.

I want to see Arsenal great again, I know it is the board that is hurting us, Silent Stan is the current owner and not investing enough... rather he would spend 500 mil on a ranch in USA instead of his many sports teams.

I do not know who we will end up signing but I will say this, AFC has surprised us fans more than once with transfers, who thought we would drop # 42.5 mil on Ozil?

3 years ago when we needed a striker (and still do) Wenger refuses to pay more than 40 mil for Higuain or Suarez and then spends 42 mil on Ozil, a CAM we did not need.

Even when Wenger spends big on defenders and midfielders he spends poorly ie # 35 mil each on Mustafi and Xhaka.

Arteta was signed for 10 mil on deadline day.he has played his part already.I don't think he should stay on for another year.Wenger keeps on delaying our DM signing due to the availability of arteta.we need him out asap

2.5 mil for Bielik (17), 6mil for Brozovic (21)....8.5 mil on potential, and we refuse to pay 6 / 7mil for Winston Reid who will improve us RIGHT NOW.

I would prefer we went and spent close to 35 to forty mil on our next striker as all the best ones usually go for around that price of late but if we have to go for 20m player well then you wont get much better than Mandzukic.

I would rather spend 60/70 mil on 2 top players than pay the same amount for 3/4 average players... With that said, Alexis is one marquee signing... if we can get Reus in, it would be great.

I was surprised Wenger spent over # 30 mil on defender Jury is still out on Xhaka.

I hate to always be having a go at Wenger I wish he would just get it right but spending # 20 mil on Vardy looks just plain dumb to me.

Better than # 16 mil on Chambers.

the man is money crazy wenger, only spent 20 mil on sanchez.

Spending 300 mil on player transfers for world class players and selling the players not fit to wear the shirt.

Anyone can make a statement but you need to back it up, Even with Sanchez we are not strong enough to win the league or even challenge, We need more top players, At the moment we have spent around 40 mil on transfers, Where is the so called warchest.

If we are willing to spend over forty mil on Benz well then I think we should offer the same for Higuain.

He could definitely go make $ 7.5 mil on another team.

Mack has a big payday coming up and Raiders aren't in a position to be spending $ 12 mil on a single receiver with so many other glaring issues.

No way Barkley is falling to us at 9/10... We are going to have to spend $ 4 mil on someone like Burkhead or Crowell... Are they better than Marshawn?

which means we are spending almost all $ 13 mil on Landry.

What a waste of 35 mil on Sanchez... Did you see his crossing today?

In your above post, if we spent # 40 mil on Nzonzi then we could get Carvalho for about the same and I do rate him, he is also younger so longer term prospect.

If we get him for 21 mil it is a steal when you consider ManU spend 64 mil on ADM.. He could also bench some of our players like Wilshere, Ramsey, Cazorla or Coquelin.

It's better that we have room for players to arrive in summer, two new CM's, spend about forty - fifty mil on the right one rather than watching Coquelin without Cazorla.

before all the retards start giving thumbs down just do a quick round up of who we sold and bought and you will figure out that we have just spent 30 mil on players and look at manure they are getting di maria for 63mil... just a shame... this is rubbish, we have no chance if we do nt spend on a strker, defender and a holding midf... I'm sorry for myself and all arsenal supporters.

im lost for words, spend 50 mil on a player who looked dangerous and keep taking him off around the 65 th min,, now we need a goal

I would guess that Wenger will be given around # 40 mil on players BUT he won't actually do the negotiations, that is what Gazidis is for.

We would be a stronger, more balanced team had we spent 42.5 mil on a ST and 30mil on a DM.

Arsenal as a club need to spend 40 to 50 mil on players of quality not 20 on a player who takes a season to show if they are good.

They aren't the perfect team, but I don't see the media calling out their crisis after wasting 40 mil on an average Ox and getting hammered by City.

if I were arsenal I would have slapped 70 mil on Bellerin.

Eddie Howe did want to sign him permanently but said what we wanted was too high but having now spent # 20 mil on a player and if the price is low may well be back in for him.

They probably could have had Keenum for 10 mil on a longer term deal right now had they signed Keenum a year or two ago.