Sentences with phrase «mil over»

ACCOMPLISHMENTS * Grew operating profit by 48 % or $ 1.4 mil over 2 - year period * 4 - year digital direct run rate = +24 % * 4 - y...

How is 7 mil over two years anything compared to Wenger getting more than twice that?

Give us $ 100 mil over 10 years.»

I am just saying that if I were Hunter I'd have a chip on my shoulder knowing that I have put up similar offensive # s, I am a year younger, I have a better arm and seem to be more durable yet I am fighting for a roster spot and the most similar player to me on the team has 83 mil over 5, seems to get hurt a lot and has a guaranteed starting job.

If you could extend Tartt for 15 mil over 4 years would you do it?

Why turn it down, in hopes that his grandchildren wouldn't have to work because everything went well and he makes $ 60 mil over the same period?

Not exact matches

It is crazy to think that your allocation will compound to $ 3 mil in just over a decade.

There might be over 30 mil sufferers that like others to suffer in the FUSA alone.

Now there's invisible words in the text The unfaithful PUblic Servants with their power grab by the killer kourts strive with the men, the fathers, and deserve death according to the text, 60 mil times over.

My MIL makes a cake similar to this but she pours boiling water over it.

My MIL is from the South and I think she will drool over this!

This recipe is handed over to my MIL by her paternal grandmother from Tanjavur region of Tamil Nadu.

My MIL has a big Meyer lemon tree but I didn't get over there to pick any lemons this year.

couple of solid tv spots and he's over a mil easy.

I agree with you as apparently close to a deal with Chelsea for # 35 mil just as he is showing good form for us all over the pitch.

30 HRs and a salary just over 3 mil.

Higuain was too expensive (# 70 mil for a 29 year old) Janssen scored over 20 goals per season in the Dutch League He will def help Spurs

If we loose another potential signing just over 10 mil difference then it will be Arsenal is back again with their horrific transfer policy.

That moment when you realise if we had acted early we could have signed Hummels (32 mil) or Ashley Williams (10 mil) and are now having to over pay for an Everton reject (not questioning Mustafi's quality, just stating that he did not make it at Everton).

People make the BS claim that Wenger has final say over all transfers but I can find a vid and link it where Wenger is saying he didn't want Arsenal to buy Welbroke, you know we offered a rumored # 30mil for Lacazette, with the Welbroke cash that could have been # 45 mil.

Although, paying LaVine more than Jimmy (19 mil per) will be making over the next 3 years in the same span is the type of crushing irony we have come accustom to.

So if we go and spend 25 - 40 mil, it looks like we get a player that is hardly an upgrade over Giroud or even not an upgrade at all.

Holding and Bielik took ages to get over the line and that was about five mil for both.

Some underrated finds over at Brew Hoop (MIL):

A lot of people questioned Wenger over paying 16 mil for a RB when we just bought in Debuchy.

Lil wonder why Moaniho was willing to fork out well over 30something miL for him..........

Bung a few mil on top & buy (as Charlie points out) a proven goalscorer for both club and country over numerous seasons a.k.a World Class such as Edison Cavani.

Ar $ ene was earning over # 7 mil during those times.

Got ta admit, we wasted money on Xhaka, why not spend the 30 + mil on a striker of class early in the window before the price escalates, or that 17mil of perez plus 30 of xhaka and bid 50 for Lakaku, we still need a striker and the Sanchez experikent has to stop now its enough, I need more from ozil guys, I really do, ive always felt that, and I rate Coq over eleneny, xhaka, ramsey

Cazorla is a Barcelona - esc player all over and we got him for fifteen mil.

I doubt AM will sell Greizmann unless the offer is over fifty sixty mil and I don't think they'll get that offer just yet.

But hey, lets ignore what the player has said themselves and have a dig at Arsenal for failing to spend when they have already spent over # 30 mil to resolve the holding CM issue on a young talent who is dominating in the Euros...

An agent recently published his account of the Arshavin transfer where Arsenal were playing silly beggers over 1 mil.

where as the like or sterling, stones and walker are been sold nothing less than 50mil, Lukaku even went to united nothing less than 75 mil whereas Sanchez left foot is better than Lukaku's both foot to me, they must be on some cheap high, if not for AFC that has been joking with players contract over the years we won't be in this situation... Sanchez is worth 100 mil -120 mil in today's transfer market

They have many young forwards, none gets a sniff, and then they go and pay over a hundred mil for another teenager.

If someone told you Arsene was going to spend over thirty mil on a defensive midfielder you would probably ask them do they know where their nose ends.

He was bought for 42.4 mil (BBC) His annual wages are 6.8 - 7.2 mil So annually when you spread the costs over his 5 year contract we pay 15.68 mil a year to have Ozil.

LOL i'll be happy with 15 - 20 mil for that headless chicken anything over 20 and u'll get 5 % off on your next purchase at arsenal supermarket: p

I say that is # 40 mil of our transfer budget on someone that is maybe a slight upgrade over Giroud.

So in reality spread it over 4 years and we pay 17.8 mil.

If Ivan Gazidis was a better CEO then AFC wouldn't be earning over # 75 mil a year less than UTD from the shirt / stadium / kit sponsorship deals and we could afford 1 more marquee signing.

Wenger has done ok but only a fool (doing the same thing over and over and get the same poor result) would stay on, I understand the reasons, 8 mil and be called LE prof but I would have expected him to have more experience and knowledge to not repeat his mistakes unless he is on a different agenda i.e. a financial one.

I admit to not seeing much all of him but when a teenage foreign player is rated at over fifteen mil then it usually means there is definitely something there to be worked with.

Sanchez is worth well over 60Mil and they are talking about cheryshev 37.3 mil what an insult, well we arsenal ain't interested, madrid should go look elsewhere.

Giroud was bought for 10mil, how about you aim a little of the blame / expectation the way of our 42.5 mil «best # 10 on the planet», or our 140k a week ST dynamo who played over half an hour and wasn't spotted, or at our entire midfield dynamic whose job it is to create chances for our ST to finish off.

Walcott back and akpom scoring for fun and never getting a chance I do not want to see 50 mil spent on an over rated over hyped cavani or similar!

Kokorin is a bargin and a half at # 4.3 mil, This has got a «wenger signing» written all over it!

As i said earlier... I HOPE WE DO N'T SPEND OVER 60 mil.

It's only slightly over ten mil the difference.

Let him go... sell him get as much as possible (# 8 - # 10 mil would be a good price for both teams) as for Ospina he wants regular first team which we cant give him over Cech..