Sentences with phrase «mil striker»

Use our transfer funds better elsewhere???? Where??? if we are getting a 50 mil striker yes I would be happy.
Bony who is a 30 mil striker missed some sitters last night.giroud has been scoring almost in every game he plays.we need a striker to challenge oli
if we are not getting a DM I rather have a 50 mil striker like cavani... if not I rate dzeko and benzema on the same level, only difference is that dzeko is valued around 20 mil....
50 - 70 mil striker might win you crucial games in EPL and CL... If we got that one we won't be knocked out every time from 16 - round of the CL, we might have taken the chances that we had against Utd and Chelsea... With this type of thinking we lost our title the season before when we were top of the league and I genuinely believe we lost that to City because we did not add striker as a main reason...
For 42mil, if a player needs another 50 mil striker to work, why not go out and get Bale / Greizman at 100 who will take care of both.

Not exact matches

Don't get me wrong as I am happy we have Xhaka but its silly that we spent # 35 mil getting him and we have waited until a week before the window closes to get our priorities: a CB and A Striker
I can give you the names of 6 unheralded strikers (4 South Americans and 2 Africans) we could have got for less than 15 mil and who would have given us another dimension All of them can give you quality through the middle and from the wings.
Got ta admit, we wasted money on Xhaka, why not spend the 30 + mil on a striker of class early in the window before the price escalates, or that 17mil of perez plus 30 of xhaka and bid 50 for Lakaku, we still need a striker and the Sanchez experikent has to stop now its enough, I need more from ozil guys, I really do, ive always felt that, and I rate Coq over eleneny, xhaka, ramsey
And people wan na us to buy striker like that for + # 20 mils?
Available being the key word there, cause no team will sell us their top class striker unless we table a ridiculous offer... way more than 50 mil I think.
Everybody and his uncle new we was a striker, DM and a CB short last summer and with 200 mil in the bank gaining interest.
Also, with the stance that Giroud will start the season next season as our main striker, I believe we will go for a young talent fopr striker, but not at a price above 20 mil.
Spend that 30 mil on a striker — a position where sacrifices do need to be made.
If we currently had any of the top strikers we are begging for and another team came along with a 50 mil bid, we wouldn't want to sell either.
I don't think 50 mil would be a good deal, he's not worth that much but in today's market and the lack of availability of strikers we should just pay that amount and get our man.
# 5 mils for a striker who scored 16 goals in 30 appearances last season is a steal.
With the English Premium topping on English players and being younger, around 23 while being a work horse on the field who can play both flanks as well as a striker I say he should be 18 - 19 mil.
A striker my choice Martinez, 35 - 30 mil 3.
At 12 mil he is the 2nd striker and fulfills that role admirably plays 50 games + scores 20 a season.
And Xhaka when he started was class, why spend so much on a bench player could have spent the 50 odd mil (Xhaka / Lucas) on a top striker
Makes it sound like it might be true when you consider Ozil, our budget is probably fifty mil at a time when decent strikers cost around that.
He is available, he French, he is a mobile striker and he would cost # 25 mil.
The only striker I can think of is Lacazette who would cost at least 40 - 50 mil and he is not even proven on the european stage.
By putting a price on the player based on talent, age, potential, etc. and that brings us back to whether or not he is worth 20 mil and he is, especially to a team that doesn't have many good striker option for example Arsenal or Liverpool.
That 60 odd mil would be better put towards a striker.
Feeling so peed off that one of the best available strikers is going to liverpool for a mere 16 mil!
I would prefer we went and spent close to 35 to forty mil on our next striker as all the best ones usually go for around that price of late but if we have to go for 20m player well then you wont get much better than Mandzukic.
Lewandowski and Muller?Where did you read that?I can't help but laugh when i read your comment.Wenger trying to buy two strikers Lewandowski and Muller, he must have offered over 100 mil for both.
3 years ago when we needed a striker (and still do) Wenger refuses to pay more than 40 mil for Higuain or Suarez and then spends 42 mil on Ozil, a CAM we did not need.
Higuain for thirty mil i think is a fair and wed be getting a top striker.
What we need next season: - New manager — 2 new speedy wingbacks to compliment Gibbs — 1 strong athletic DM, Flamini would be his backup — 1 speedy striker (Lavezzi is not happy in Paris, Lukaku is available for 35 mil)-- 1 winger
Selling our best striker to Manure is hard to take, I would rather see him go to Juventus for 15 mil.
If we are looking for 4th choice Carlton replacement it should be a hungry young striker with something to prove for # 4 mil not injury prone has been.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z