Sentences with phrase «mil then»

Sorry; forgot to mention that if this trade would have been based on an account size of a mil then I would have closed the 30ish where I knew it was likely to turn, and then waited for another entry and made a nice chunk of change.

We have all read about how Wenger likes Lacazette and how AFC failed in a # 30ish million bid and how many remember that we had around # 100 mil then?

If Van Diik fetches 70 mil and Walker fetched 45 mil then Wenger's purchase of Lacazette was an absolute bargain.

we'd better give Sanchez half a mil then.

I admit to not seeing much all of him but when a teenage foreign player is rated at over fifteen mil then it usually means there is definitely something there to be worked with.

If rumors are true and Wenger has only 50 mil then I do nt think so he will buy Reus.

So you're telling me that if Wenger had the chance to sell Ramsey at close to # 50mil and buy Kante for # 20 mil then he shouldn't do it because we do not need Kante?

If we do sell Alexis to PSG for a cut price of around # 35 mil then not only have we recaptured his fee but also add that to the other sales and it means we could afford a good replacement for Alexis, maybe Mahrez?

If Lacazette was going to cost us # 45 mil then all Arsenal had left to get a top CB would have been # 20 - # 25 million.

Not exact matches

I have a goal to gross 1 MIL within the next 10 years I'll be 40 then.

(Of course then you have to consider the fact that rental income would also be less, but it is easier for someone to get their foot in the door compare to your $ 1 mil property scenario)

My husband told me horror stories, and how his Pastor Dad just sat back and watched them get hit and yelled at, then come hit them again when my MIL instructed him to.

Surely he still wants to play first team football and if Arsenal gets few mils for that deal then its a win - win situation.

And then Arsenal buys Sanchez for 27 mil and Ozil for 42.5 mil and you think that entitles us to a champions league trophy?

No, that unrecyclable trash named Kroenke only cares about money, this scenario is probably going to happen: Arsenal will sell Ox for 35 mil, Sanchez for 60 mil, shkordan for 20 mil, perez for 14 mil and then Wenger will say our squad is now good enough.

If Mustafi was player Wenger wanted then I don't mind he was payed 35 mil.

If we loose another potential signing just over 10 mil difference then it will be Arsenal is back again with their horrific transfer policy.

1 game doesn't prove anything, at least say «his last season with Monaco proved it» but then you wouldn't be able to make that claim as his performances didn't warrent a # 30 + mil bid.

Give him 15 - 20 mil signing on fee and then pay him similar money to Ozil.

I think the price in which Kante went for should be where we begin (or slightly under), then expecting to go a little higher, finally meeting in between our first offer, and Lei's fifty mil, which they'll likely start off with.

I read that Wenger will only be given 100mil to rebuild but if he wants more then he will have to sell players, # 35 mil is a respectable amount and we have plenty of HG talent waiting to come through, might be worth selling him if we could get in a better player while promoting a youth.

* If Willy's Off - Limits then you could send O'Quinn + your 2018 FRP to CLE, & MIL would also send their pick CLE's way

1st bid was around 30 - 40 mil if I remeber, then 2nd bid was 45, and then third littlebit more.

If you sign Bowman, and let's say it's a 2yr@12 mil teams will know your not going ILB then right..

I wish the Vidal rumour was somewhere between 40 to 45 mil, then it would have made scence.

Tell them we want 40 mil plus 1 pound and then say no.

Because on October 9th UEFA told them they are next in line for a huge fine (like City) and other penalties for the (back then) 350 mil debt.

We aren't going to pay three hundred in wages on top of sixty mil, and then look to bring in three more recruits.

All get 5 mil a year and more and Meredith is as good if not better then all of them in my opinion.

More then `' 5 mil per year» good.

Tas, I mentioned a couple of players a while back which totaled up to around 100m, but then someone replied that it was more like one ten to fifteen mil and where is the money coming from or is Hafiz donating it.

And if Usmanov is really the one people think he is then he should not have any problem givving Mourinho 10 mils / yr.

Fifteen mil in today's money is nothing like it was in those times, and that would have been what we payed back then.

To all who say we don't need a keeper, then you don't seem to be realizing our Num 2 will be Martinez wake up this is a golden opportunity that we will never get again.psg have trapp.Barca have ter the German, navas is staying at Madrid, de gea at Manchester, man city just spent 30 mil, Bayern has neur, courtois at Chelsea, oblak at atletico, even Tottenham have hugo, our only completion is juve and both of us have an aging keeper who won't last more than two seasons at the top.

They have many young forwards, none gets a sniff, and then they go and pay over a hundred mil for another teenager.

Sky sports reporting we're getting an initial # 1.8 mil Up front then # 2.1 mil at the end of each season for 3 years.

What if we lose 40 - 60 mil now and gain champion league to ticktet, how much do you think we all get by then??? He came to us with.

If Ivan Gazidis was a better CEO then AFC wouldn't be earning over # 75 mil a year less than UTD from the shirt / stadium / kit sponsorship deals and we could afford 1 more marquee signing.

If Walker is good value for 50m well then 70 for Keita would be about right, but it's Euros in Germany so it'd be closer to 60 odd mil.

If reports in media about # 100 mil was true and extra from player sales then the math suggests we need to sell a couple / few more players before we can go for Lemar and Seri after spending an upfront fee of around # 45 mil for Lacazette.

If Wenger told Silent Stan «I will spend # 150 mil next transfer on rebuilding the squad» then do you think Silent Stan will keep him around long enough to do that?

OK, then if you do take data from the official statements (see page 4) you will notice that we have Increased the cash (207 mils) in 2014 from 153 mil in 2013.

1 - 5 Wenger I can't even blame Kroenke that much because he let Wenger spend money Wenger mostly spent it unwisely ie # 35 mil Xhaka, # 35 Mustafi, # 18 mil Chambers, Getting Lacazette but then getting Aubameyang who is the same position.

The practical part of me says 50 mil is too much, but if not Benzema then who?

Now Arteta, he's been total professional but if he can play first team football at Sociedad and Arsenal few mils out of him, then why not.

I just don't understand, why would we buy him for 4.5 mil and then sell him the next summer for 3.9 mil when he has been better than Szcz and would be perfect as a backup to Cech which I presume is guaranteed to go through now.

exactly, i would never sell rambo specially to whorino... but if push comes to shove then 50 mil and rashford and we are in business...

i do like jackson but i think his age is a worry we would prob have 3 yrs with him then he would be 31, dybala is a lot younger / even benzema is younger would cost 10 mil more than the other 2 but i would like any of these 3.

If the board agrees to pay 8 mils for his salary (which in fact is only 6, the other two are sponsorship and other deals) then I don't see why this is a problem.

Or, if we can get a good 80 million or more (ffs Higuain went for 100 mils at 29) in EPL then so be it.