Egypt's government was for decades held together by support from the West, support that was directed at maintaining Egypt's
military power as a counter-force in Middle Eastern politics.
A movement that began by viewing the acquisition of political and
military power as a satanic temptation now viewed it as a divine blessing.
It focuses on conventional U.S.
military power as an instrument enabling state cooperation, so drones» smaller footprint becomes a political drawback.
Not exact matches
I view them
as coordinated, methodical and strategic, using their
military and economic
power to erode the free and open international order,» Harris told the House Armed Services Committee.
According to a former cabinet minister who spoke on condition of anonymity, the ministers acted
as a symbolic «rubber stamp» — the cabinet has no actual approval
power — and accepted the plans presented to them by the
military.
As I have noted here before, the value of «hard
power» (
military dominance) and «soft
power» (cultural, financial, diplomatic) can not be assessed until you don't have any.
Resentments of America returned, 50 years after General Eisenhower's (mainly American) armies had liberated western Europe, including most of Germany, 75 years after General Pershing's Expeditionary Forces saved the victory of France and the British Empire on the Western Front, and
as soon
as American firmness and economic and
military power had induced the bloodless collapse of the Soviet empire and Union, and of international communism.
As the US
military's attention shifts back to great -
power competition, particular focus is being paid to the potential for conflict in the extreme conditions found at northern latitudes and higher elevations.
The proposed rise in the Pentagon budget to $ 603 billion comes
as the United States has wound down major wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and remains the world's strongest
military power.
The US has repeatedly said that it will not accept North Korea
as a nuclear
power and that it will consider
military intervention to stop it.
Other defense companies such
as Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics — which manufactures everything from tanks to nuclear -
powered submarines — have also benefited amid talks of augmented
military spend.
Cree's Wolfspeed product families include SiC materials,
power - switching devices and RF devices targeted for applications such
as electric vehicles, fast charging, inverters,
power supplies, telecom and
military and aerospace.
People of peace, we use our
military power sparingly; but when we do so we do so with full conviction, gathering our forces
as men and women who believe that the freedoms we enjoy can not be taken from us.
His emphasis on hard
power and intelligence - gathering
as the primary means of pursuing Canada's interests is now echoed by the current administration in Washington, which has gutted the State Department, allocated record amounts of funding to the
military and appointed
military - minded men in key foreign policy positions.
Toward creditor nations, however, America relates
as the world's most Highly Indebted
Military Power by refusing to raise its own interest rates or taxes, or to permit key U.S. industries to be sold off.
We are extremely uncomfortable about the fact that some countries who have confidence on their
military power are using Syria
as their arm - wrestling field,» he said.
Setting aside the shortcomings of the Belt and Road concept, the «OBOR hype» around the world points to a real and fundamental trend — the ascent of China
as a truly global economic and
military power.
To address
power and prestige, while it may be true that Britain's loss of reserve - currency status in the 20th century coincided roughly with its loss of political and
military preeminence, I think it is incorrect to imply that Britain lost
power and prestige after the Great War mainly or even partly because sterling lost its status
as the dominant reserve currency (which in fact really occurred some time in the 1930s and 1940s).
Yet most discussions treat the balance of payments and exchange rates
as if they were determined purely by commodity trade and «purchasing
power parity,» not by the financial flows and
military spending that actually dominate the balance of payments.
Transnational corporation penetrates
as the mighty economic
power, and the
military of the powerful nations penetrate politically through inter-locking systems alliances and their strategic and tactical coordinations in the name of peace and security.
The present paper assumes an historical perception that the Creation of God is being undone by the
power of science and technology, which is being manifested in the form of
powers of exclusive truth of scientific knowledge, unlimited technological know - how, and their economic and political organization, such
as the transnational corporation and the state, including the
military machinery.
In a world
as dangerous
as ours, a judicious use of
military power is probably unavoidable, I did not oppose the war in the Persian Gulf: annexation by force must be reversed.
Even though,
as a Christian, I can only support
military action with fear and trembling, I am not arguing that all use of
military power is wrong.
about people who experience same - sex attraction trying to live a Christian life, this fuller exposition of his thought on the new ideologies presented a fascinating look into the way in which colonialism — discredited by liberals and to lesser extent many conservatives
as well — has gone away from the actual
military and political rule seen in previous centuries, to a stealthier and subtler form of the exertion of foreign
power.
People such
as Hitler used that claim to come to
power and justify building his
military, claiming it a defense against the «decadent West» (which turned out to be much stronger than him).
We identified the warrior God
as our God, and when we came into political
power we frequently claimed God's support for
military conquests.
Of course, if you're taught over and over by the rock mythology, or even by PBS or the NYT, that the Righteous Artist ought to say the equivalent of «F# $ @ You» to the likes of the «
military - industrial establishment,» the «system,» or the «
Power,» you might assume that you ought to say the words themselves to something a bit more obviously impacting your life, such
as your ex-girlfriend.
Cycles of rapid expansion in economic production are likely to be followed by downturns conditioned by slackening demand; the costs of acquiring and protecting new markets through diplomatic deals and
military intervention eventually outweigh the gains to be had from these markets; dominant countries gradually lose their hegemonic
power; and the whole system becomes subject to the strains of realignment
as new countries or new modes of production rise to prominence.
It is turning into a combination of ideological tics and irritable gestures even
as the worst actors gain
power.Ross Douthat argues that the Obama administration is shifting the U.S.'s foreign policy strategy from a Pax Americana model (where the U.S. uses
military force to impose order) to one of offshore balancing (where the U.S. strategically sides with one local
power or another while keeping U.S. commitments to a minimum).
In a world where political problems are thought of and worked upon within a frame of reference whose coordinates are nationalism and
military power, these ecology - oriented organizations are regarded
as peripheral.
It not only implies, for the several national «governments», the prospect of having to waive a substantial portion of the pomp, prerogative and privilege which they now enjoy
as the traditional concomitants of the possession of national
military power, and having to content themselves with the considerably smaller amount of glory which is reserved for mere units of local administration.
Finally, there is the injustice of an ever - expanding and necrophilic militarism
as violent uses of
power and force whereby nonegalitarian relationships are defended, whether internally through various forms of police and surveillance force, or externally through massive
military and espionage forces.
The idea that the U.S. was an unquestioned
military colossus athwart the world, which no
power or people could effectively oppose, was hubristic nonsense certain to get the country into deep trouble —
as it did — and bring the U.S. Army to the point of collapse,
as happened in Vietnam and may well happen again in Iraq (and Afghanistan).
To effect outcomes it wants, such a nation must recognize the importance of «soft
power» — cultural and ideological appeal —
as well
as the «hard
power» —
military and economic — at its disposal.
On the other hand, they serve the political,
military and economic
powers that be and operate
as consultants to them
as well
as accepting invitations to generalize from scientific research to political and social philosophies — blinkered mandarins, speaking
as if they were wise.
I have suggested elsewhere that value - free technology, the
military - industrial complex, and narrow nationalism might be modern examples of such principalities and
powers.9 Hendrikus Berkhof suggests that human traditions, astrology, fixed religious rules, clans, public opinion, race, class, state, and Volk are among the
powers.10 Walter Wink sees the
powers as the inner aspects of institutions, their «spirituality,» the inner spirit or driving force that animates, legitimates, and regulates their outward manifestations.11 They are «the invisible forces that determine human existence «12 When such things dehumanize human life, thwart and distort the human spirit, block God's gift of shalom, the followers of Jesus are rallied for a new kind of holy war.
The importance of the
power problem for Christian ethics derives both from the fact that
power, whether economic, political,
military, or spiritual, means capacity to determine life for good or ill, and from the fact that some fundamental redistribution of
power is necessary
as a condition of the freedom and dignity of men in their social relations.
The final question,
as to the Christian conscience and the coercive use of
military power by one State upon another, we shall defer to the next chapter which will be devoted centrally to this issue.
With the end of the cold war, the USA was the only remaining super
power with enormous
military and economic
power such
as the world has not seen before.
If any of us ever had illusions that a reformist posture was sufficient, either from a theological perspective or
as social policy, the intractability of governmental and economic systems, the growth of massive and seemingly uncontrollable systems of surveillance,
military power, and mass culture increasingly narrow the scope of our options to those of resistance and withdrawal.
The mega - mediacompanies are centres of
power that are at the same time linked into other circuits of
power, such
as the financial institutions, the
military establishments, and the political elite.
You recall that the SABC, the South African Broadcasting Corporation, the exclusive state monopoly for radio and television, had the night before run an American Defense Department film version of their latest report on «Soviet
Military Power,» with Secretary Casper Wineberger issuing dire warnings
as animated hammer - and - sickle emblems marched menacingly down the coast of Africa.
Advocating for peace is requiring us to confront the seductive
power of
military might at a time when its allure becomes almost unbearable; dissent is seen
as treason, discussion
as a betrayal.
The U.S. could take stronger initiative in the global development of nuclear
power; we are regarded
as the creators of atomic energy, but so far
military uses have been more impressive than peaceful ones.
And this fallacious idea of the need to «balance» each other in destructive
power has come to be regarded
as self - evident to the people of America — because of what President Dwight Eisenhower in his last message to the American people called the «
military - industrial complex» and what Alva Myrdal in her book The Game of Disarmament calls the «arms race within the arms race.
Virginia Declaration of Rights, 1776 XIII That a well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided
as dangerous to liberty; and that, in all cases, the
military should be under strict subordination to, and be governed by, the civil
power.
The South fired first, on Fort Sumter, and Lincoln took immediate action under his constitutional
powers as president and
military commander in chief.
None of what Lincoln achieved — the eventual abolition of slavery, the preservation of the Union — would have happened had Lincoln not thought himself constitutionally authorizedto resist the Supreme Court's decision in Dred Scott; constitutionally obligated, by his oath, to resist secession; and constitutionally empowered,
as commander in chief, to fight the enemy with the full
powers at his disposal, which included
military force, blockade, suspension of habeas corpus, arrest and detention, seizure of enemy property, and emancipation of Southern slaves.
She includes historical context such
as the influences of sociological change resulting from the transfer of
power from matriarchal to patriarchal emphasis and the effects of the implementation of the brigade system that was developed from all - male
military institutions.
As a major global military power, Russia is clearly «able» to thwart ISIS — certainly just as well as most of the Western NATO states participating in airstrikes alread
As a major global
military power, Russia is clearly «able» to thwart ISIS — certainly just
as well as most of the Western NATO states participating in airstrikes alread
as well
as most of the Western NATO states participating in airstrikes alread
as most of the Western NATO states participating in airstrikes already.