Sentences with phrase «military spending does»

Not exact matches

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.

As it happened, we kept the tax cuts, added new military and Medicare spending, and did nothing to raise new revenue or cut other spending.

The corollary is that other countries» balance - of - payments surpluses do not stem primarily from trade relations, but from financial speculation and a spillover of U.S. global military spending.

I will grant you that we do have access to very inexpensive and quite good health care coverage (TRICARE) due to having full retirement benefits from the military, but I will also mention that neither of us have spent even $ 1 of our military retirements on living expenses.

And that doesn't even factor in the economic activity generated by a $ 61 billion hike in military spending — 14 new Navy ships, 90 airplanes, dozens of helicopters, and pay raises for all military personnel.

He doesn't get rid of the deficit, and he wants to increase military spending, which is purely based on fear.

But it's true that the U.S. spends less now on the military than it did when Eisenhower made his statement.

Obviously we don't need full scale wars to get the target... but if paying for a tank you can't afford is what you want then lets keep buying tanks... Bush was able to double our debt in his 8 years primarily due to crazy military spending, and Obama isn't doing very well either.

that's exactly what republicans are saying and wil continue to say because of military spending in their districts and kick backs from foreign governments who don't have to cover thecost of their own security needs.

do we spend it on our own people's needs or send it to military companies who focus on foreign interests and basically killing people.

Besides — aren't the Christian Right people the ones who are saying don't touch military spending?

I do not need the government or media to tell me how to live my life, I spent over ten years in the active military I joined when it was an honor to serve and as soldiers we did not have to follow bureaucratic system of rules that are in place now we had something the liberals will never have honor and morality.

Funny, how do you think Mitt will cut the defecit as he stated he will cut taxes by 5 trillion dollars and increase military spending by 2 trillion over 4 years?

I did enjoy you saying zero federal dollars would be spent on the military as though it were a trump card rather than something that would make me even more in favor of universal healthcare

There's nothing to gain for Russia by starting a war in Europe, and any fearmongering of them planning to do so is always, inevitable, by someone who profits from higher military spending.

And this Al - Monitor (a media site focused on Middle East which was accused of following «the agenda of the Iranian and Syrian governments and Hezbollah») article details a bit more the military budget and the growing trend of Iran's military spendings, although it does not state the current total defense budget and its numbers are considerably lower than SIPRI's for the past years, maybe because the fiscal year used in this article begins near 20th March:

In addition, one must take into account the large economic footprint of the private defense industry from companies like Lockheed Martin and Boeing who are dependent on the military for contracts to keep them going, as well as the kind of industries that one doesn't think of when they think of military spending and dependence on the military like food service contracts or transportation spending.

The injunction of less government never applies to military spending and as it did for Reagan this will provide a hidden form of Keynesian pump priming.

Why do all these standards just disappear whenever it comes to military spending?

«The secretary of state spent as much time in opposition agreeing to our spending plans and demanding greater spending on the military as he has done in government providing them with less.

The defence experts did however agree that the SDSR was a good balance between the need for spending cuts and preserving the UK military, suggesting that many had feared far greater cuts to the budget than the 7.5 % which emerged.

@DA All sarcasm aside, democrats do frequently go for military spending cuts, which is resisting national defence.

He accused the government of underfunding the military in Iraq and Afghanistan, but did not make any firm commitments to increasing defence spending or rolling back commitments.

«In fact, the ministry, on several occasions, had to call press conferences to provide details of budgetary spending on the military, to show, against the background of limited resources and other urgent national priorities, that it was doing its best on funding security.

He does not take his $ 60,000 military pension, because, «I came here to try to contain spending.»

«In fact, the Ministry, on several occasions, had to call press conferences to provide details of budgetary spending on the military, to show, against the background of limited resources and other urgent national priorities, that it was doing its best on funding security.

Brigadier Adesope further disclosed that the board spends N9.2 billion monthly for 92,000 military pensioners, adding that he did not know how the Federal government came about payment of pensions from Service Wide Votes instead of the budget.

Many U.S. science agencies would have to make do with less under the president's 2006 budget request, which aims to cut the deficit, boost military and antiterrorism spending, and make tax cuts permanent President George W. Bush has proposed a flat budget for U.S. science next year.

When a congressional committee failed in its remit to do just that last November, the clock began ticking towards an automatic cut that will claw the required amount from across the federal government, including all military and non-military spending that is not required by law.

While Moscow's spending on military hardware dropped by two - thirds last year, says Cooper, «production didn't fall anything like that.»

And here's a guy who's just played a military man in his next movie, and has come off an award season playing a sociopath in Nocturnal Animals, and has also played a superhero, and he spends most of his time talking about gardening, and cooking for his children, and doing the grocery shopping, and when discussing his marriage, here's how he describes what he gets out of it:

If you don't really need to spend the money distributed from your Inherited IRA for your household expenses (your opening statement that your income for 2016 is low might make this unlikely), and (i) you and / or your spouse received compensation (earned income such as wages, salary, self - employment income, commissions for sales, nontaxable combat pay for US Military Personnel, etc) in 2016, and (ii) you were not 70.5 years of age by December 2016, then you and your wife can make contributions to existing IRAs in your names or establish new IRAs in your names.

I will grant you that we do have access to very inexpensive and quite good health care coverage (TRICARE) due to having full retirement benefits from the military, but I will also mention that neither of us have spent even $ 1 of our military retirements on living expenses.

I don't see how a heavily indebted nation is going to both cut taxes and increase military and infrastructure spending; even deep cuts in entitlement programs (social security?

Don't take photos of any military installations and equipment, it is a breach of national security and you could end up in jail, and you do not want to spend your vacations... and a bit... at a Vietnamese jaido not want to spend your vacations... and a bit... at a Vietnamese jail.

There's a military that needs funding and constant management to make sure it doesn't accidentally wage war on the neighbors; religion to deal with and all of the many problems that stem from it; a population to keep fed, clothed, warm and happy; and a treasury that constantly seems to be on the brink of containing no money whatsoever because you spent it all on that big gold statue.

There's a military adage that no plan survives first contact and Phantom Pain displays this every time you spend 15 minutes scouting the perimeter, planning a perfect ingress / egress from a heavily fortified compound, then creep in, start popping headshots on unsuspecting guards and have the whole thing go to shit so you switch to shock and awe as you dash to and from your objective, ducking in and out of buildings, laying down cover fire, and make a safe zone to extract your target before calling in a helicopter strike to reduce everything in the area to a smoking crater before walking out of the ashes and flying off to your next objective all because stupid Quiet didn't notice one target on her scouting run.

A nation can not spend the percentage of their national budget we do military without everything else suffering.

Still, our soldiers did their duty, something that can only be explained and honored if you've spent time around military people.

My brother spent 27 years in the US military, 9 years with NATO in Europe and is still working with companies that actually DO provide advice and services to the US military at the highest command levels.

It's neither inspirational, nor innovative to fan the flames of insurgency and terrorism in foreign lands by having a massive spend on military action while telling everyone at home to tighten their belts and become entrepreneurs and innovators while they're doing it.»

The annual cost of transforming the global energy system would be less than the U.S. now spends on its military, and far smaller than the cost of doing nothing.

Obviously if the world has less evil people like tt, we could do with less military spending and easily afford mitigation.

It is not a lot that the developed nations have to do, except provide 1 % of the world's military spending, $ 10 billion, every year to the LDCF.

It is about time the DOE finally did something about it, and we get ten years investment all for the cost of about one month military spending in Iraq.

But I'm going to do it all over again — because I was just reminded of this: China spends 1 / 6th the amount the United States does on its military, and spends twice what the US does on funding clean energy.

Taken one step further, if the governmental agency (not just military) doesn't spend any one year's allocation the next year will be cut.

If fighting malaria was his real goal, he could as easily have asked the question: Why don't we divert to it some of the (large and nontheoretical) sums spent on, say, the military?

It was when I did a summer internship with the Army JAG, that I got to go to spend some time in their police training facility for military police, and that's where I learned about things like solicitation and conspiracy, and some of the more intricacies of assault, and then that inspired me to start digging deeper.

The US approach is even more equitable, since it does not so much «exempt» military or diplomats, but «credits» service with the government, military, certain NGOs as time spent in the US.