Sentences with phrase «military would not»

Your exposure to the military would not enter the picture.

It might fair to say that the military would not disagree.

The military would not just up and kill American civilians willingly.

Perhaps if the Taliban in Afghanistan had concerned itself with it's own country and business, and didn't train people to be terrorists to come to our country to kill thousands of Americans, then the US military would not be there at all.

Earlier on Thursday, Trump described his efforts to remove unauthorized immigrants from the US as «a military operation,» a phrase that seemed to contradict efforts from White House officials who said the military would not be involved with the deportation plans.

Pakistan's powerful military has not commented on Trump's speech, but the day before it denied any terrorists had havens in the country.

Having openly Gay and atheist soldiers within the military has not harmed the force or the country.

«Even until now, the military has not returned the symbol of authority they took away from the Egbesu Shrine and other valuables in Oporoza community during the May 28, 2016 invasion.

«The military has not been as sensitive as it might have been to wildlife concerns,» says Dewey.

While the military hasn't used glowing bacteria to send any actual messages, they might one day.

Parents insist that over 200 girls are still missing, and the military has not rescued any of them.

A monopolistic military has not always been successful, similar to the record of the public schools.

Due to my husband being in the military I haven't been able to work.

«Ten years after the housing market collapse Eastern North Carolina seems to be healing, but it appears the military hasn't fully recovered.

Not exact matches

Army Col. Jeffery R. Nance, the military judge overseeing Bergdahl's case, had ruled in February that Trump's statements as a candidate (and, therefore, a private citizen) didn't rise to the level of undue command influence.

In a series of tweets posted on Wednesday, Trump said that his government would not allow transgender people to serve «in any capacity,» a decision he said was taken on the advice of US generals and military experts.

WASHINGTON (AP)-- The Trump administration doesn't have a «bloody nose» strategy focused on a military strike against North Korea's nuclear program without provoking a full - scale war.

«If I'm able to communicate one thing to adults, it would be this: It should not be easier to purchase a gun than it is to obtain a driver's license, and military - grade weapons should not be accessible in civilian settings,» she wrote.

Democratic Sen. Jeanne Shaheen and Republican Sen. James Risch say they've been told that the administration isn't considering what some describe as «bloody nose» approach — meaning a military attack intended to demonstrate U.S. resolve but not lead to war.

«Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelming victory and can not be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgender in the military would entail,» said Trump.

«I think a lot of the soldiers that go in the military don't have entirely what they need to tackle the workforce in the first place,» Smith said.

What we in the West definitely don't know is the current location of Bo or Wang, what repercussions will be felt by Bo's powerful allies in politics, business and the military (the Financial Times reported May 14 that Bo's mentor and standing committee member Zhou Yongkang had been relieved of his duties as head of China's police, courts and spy apparatus), and who is going to lead China for the next 10 years, let alone what their policy leanings may be.

The «dangers» of peace may not have been purely imagined for the political and military leadership that believed in the necessity of fighting the Great War.

But immigration reform won't come easy, and that's why Laurene Powell Jobs today launched TheDreamIsNow.org, an online petition supporting the Dream Act, a bill that would grant a path to citizenship to undocumented young people who enroll in college or join the military.

Yet Saudi Arabia is not without its critics, who lament its poor record on human rights, draconian executions of political prisoners and military intervention in the civil war in Yemen, a conflict that has caused a humanitarian disaster in the country and one which is seen as a proxy war between the kingdom and its regional rival, Iran.

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey told Israeli leaders Jan. 20 that the United States would not participate in a war against Iran begun by Israel without prior agreement from Washington, according to accounts from well - placed senior military officers.

But Mattis, a retired Marine general, is not the only US military officer who has supplemented his martial knowledge with academic achievement.

As US President Donald Trump enjoyed chocolate cake with Chinese President Xi Jinping at Mar - a-Lago in April, he ordered the military to do something his predecessor hadn't dared: directly strike Syrian President Bashar Assad's regime.

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, a powerful military arm in Iran, reportedly «would not accept a continued engagement with the US if its closest ally was being hit,» Solomon said.

Seven Iranian military advisors supporting Syrian government forces were killed mid-April, but so far the conflict has not devolved into all - out war, something experts say both countries want to avoid.

Although there have been several recent cross-border attacks and incursions, the Eurasia Group team does not see a broader military conflict in 2017 given that both countries» prime ministers are focused on domestic issues.

There's not another military service that has one — yet we as a military service have five consecutive clean financial audit opinions.

At the same time, we're doing enforcement activity in our remote [exclusive economic zones] to make sure that there's not illegal fishing activity taking place, and we were not seeing that activity, but it was peeling off a lot of our resources toward what I would consider a relatively benign threat, and then we're providing other resources to do exercises with the military in the remote parts of the world but with really no strategic outcome that I could discern where the Coast Guard was providing a unique capability.

I guess it comes from the military principle that troops are like spaghetti: you can't push them, you have to pull them.

A U.S. official familiar with the military planning said there could be more air strikes if the intelligence indicates Assad had not stopped making, importing, storing or using chemical weapons, including chlorine.

But the rise of the Central State beholden to its fiefdoms (public unions, shadow Security State, military industrial complex, the sickcare cartels, etc.) has enabled the wholesale distortion not just of domestic markets but of the entire global economy.

Iraqi and military sources say there has been a debate about whether or not to close off the western route in and out of Mosul.

As I have noted here before, the value of «hard power» (military dominance) and «soft power» (cultural, financial, diplomatic) can not be assessed until you don't have any.

(It didn't help that in the interview Bannon scoffed at the idea that U.S. would ever take military action against North Korea.)

Because U.S. military veterans have all the traits needed to become a great entrepreneur, but they don't always have access to the necessary funds to start their business.

South Korea's military used the software on its military computers, but the North Koreans still shouldn't have been able to get in because Seoul keeps its internet, or outwardly connected network, separate from its intranet, or private network.

Therefore the military would have to target «not only nuclear infrastructure but command and control facilities, key leaders, artillery and missile units, chemical and biological weapons facilities, airfields, ports, and other targets deemed critical to regime survival,» according to the report for Congress.

If we are to ever find a solution to the current crisis, there is one fact that must be soberly and humbly recognized: There is no preventive military solution to the North Korean nuclear program that would not impose unacceptable, catastrophic cost on the U.S. and our allies South Korea and Japan.

That is defensible only if one is certain that the baseline level of possible robotic error in civilian protection exceeds that baseline level of human error... I, for one, would not bet against the possibility that for some military applications, we will some day come to see mere human judgment as guaranteeing an unacceptable level of indiscriminate and disproportionate violence.

Trump may have been aiming for the phrase «military precision,» linguist Ben Zimmer told Business Insider, but that wouldn't necessarily excuse him, either.

Although the US military, Secretary of State Tillerson, and Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis all say unequivocally that the US does not want or train for regime - change missions in North Korea, the president and the military have to do what's best for the country at any cost.

In February of last year, Trump described the removal of authorized immigration by his administration as «a military operation,» a comment that contrasted with other officials in his administration, who stressed that deportations would not be pursued en masse or in the style of a military operation.

After all, he says, «the U.S. would likely interfere, or attempt to mediate, and Japan's Self - Defense Forces, though not large, are superbly trained and well equipped, making a Chinese military move extremely risky.»

«He and I haven't spoken, and I disagree,» Trump said during the second presidential debate on Sunday, when asked about Pence's position that the U.S. should be able to strike military targets operated by Syrian President Bashar Assad.

Simply put, military solutions don't solve political problems, but in case of disaster, the US always has options ready.