meaning that he has chosen Moberg for being the latest
millenial reconstruction available.
I'll simply note that the McShane and Wyner
millenial reconstruction has a pronounced hockey stick shape, albeit with a higher Medieval Warm Period and wider error bars than the norm seen in various spaghetti graphs (apparently attributable to the Bayesian «path» approach).
Not exact matches
Every peer - reviewed
millenial temperature
reconstruction shows current temperatures hotter than during the Roman and Medieval periods.
If the line is drawn there on efforts to resurrect the HS, can anything useful with regard to the AGW issue be learned from
millenial scale temperature
reconstructions?
You have to have some real basis for this assumption, before you do a
millenial scale «
reconstruction.»
Along the way, Corcoran even manages to confuse a little known Phil Jones graphic with Michael Mann's «hockey stick»
millenial temperature
reconstruction.
We don't need to do
millenial timescale
reconstruction for certain ecosystem responses.
But the graph of the full
reconstruction of
millenial temperatures would, as it turned out, be prominently featured in the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2001 Report, the Third Assessment Report, or TAR.