That
our millennial scale trend, which we reasonably trust, and have some idea of the uncertainties in, is in line w / that null hypothesis is information that can not be ignored.
Not exact matches
«Instead, the shift to higher temperatures during the 20th century reversed the
millennial scale cooling
trend.»
Now, no - one thinks that tree ring records have
millennial scale non-climatic
trends (their problem is precisely the opposite, that the multi-century
scale climate
trends might be damped), the same is true for ice cores etc..
The suggested synchroneity of tropical and North Atlantic centennial to
millennial variability (de Menocal et al., 2000; Mayewski et al., 2004; Y.J. Wang et al., 2005) is not common to the SH (Masson et al., 2000; Holmgren et al., 2003), suggesting that
millennial scale variability can not account for the observed 20th - century warming
trend.
If you average so as to eliminate
millennial -
scale variation, I suppose you get that
trend.
Gradual, insolation - driven
millennial -
scale temperature
trends in the study area were punctuated by several abrupt climate changes, including a major transient event recorded in all five lakes between 4.3 and 3.2 ka, which overlaps in timing with abrupt climate changes previously documented around the North Atlantic region and farther afield at w4.2 ka.
The Holocene in general shows both a long - term
trend (cooling) and
millennial and centennial / multidecadal time -
scale variability.
Superimposed on these long - term
trends are
millennial -
scale fluctuations characterized by periods of low sea - ice and high sea - surface temperature and salinity that appear quasi-cyclic with a frequency of about one every 2500 — 3000 years.