Not exact matches
Recently, China has shown how coal can play a critical role in lifting people
out of energy poverty —
out of the total population
of 1.3 billion, only three
million do not have access to electricity in China today.
If, for instance, the United States and India are required to reduce ghg emissions by the same percentage amount, for instance 90 %, then the US per capita emissions
of approximately 20 tons CO2 per capita would allow US citizens to emit CO2 at the rate
of 2 tons per capita while the current India per capita emissions
of approximately 1.8 tons per capita would mean that the Indian citizens could emit only at the rate 0.18 tons per capita even though India needs to dramatically increase its
energy use to assure that hundreds
of millions of people economically rise
out of grinding
poverty and India has comparatively done little to cause the existing problem.
STORED solar
energy that will continue to improve the lives
of anyone exposed to it and lift
millions more
out of abject
poverty, including the 1.3 Billion who still have no electricity, at all.
(these obviously being
energy resources which have and can continue to lift many
millions out of poverty) and is because they wish to pretend that they have control over the weather which does not involve their moral actions.
Brook Riley,
energy efficiency campaigner for Friends
of the Earth Europe said: «By increasing the 2030
energy efficiency target the European Commission could lift
millions of people
out of energy poverty, cut greenhouse gas emissions, and create jobs.
As I pointed
out in the previous post, the UK's
energy and climate policies have resulted in rising prices, millions of UK households living in «fuel poverty», and the possibility that energy intensive industries will leave these shores at the expense of many thousands of jobs, yet the Dept. of Energy and Climate Change's priorities are with the mitigation of climate c
energy and climate policies have resulted in rising prices,
millions of UK households living in «fuel
poverty», and the possibility that
energy intensive industries will leave these shores at the expense of many thousands of jobs, yet the Dept. of Energy and Climate Change's priorities are with the mitigation of climate c
energy intensive industries will leave these shores at the expense
of many thousands
of jobs, yet the Dept.
of Energy and Climate Change's priorities are with the mitigation of climate c
Energy and Climate Change's priorities are with the mitigation
of climate change.
So rather than make divorce harder for couples with small children, and rather than spend
millions on promoting marriage as a way to get people
out of poverty (which doesn't work, by the way), why not put that
energy into helping people get college degrees?