Not exact matches
Guy Kawasaki addresses emotional contagion in his book Enchantment: «Smiling sends a very clear message
about your state of
mind, not smiling creates an opening for many
interpretations, including grumpiness, aloofness, and anger.»
Not just a «lifehack» or a bit of trivia but actually learned a new skill, or compelling new
interpretation of Scripture or — God forbid — something that actually changed your
mind about a long - held belief?
But also keep in
mind there are
about 10 different
interpretations of QM.
Everything we can learn
about the text's original setting and its subsequent
interpretation in the church is legitimate knowledge for serious -
minded reflection by the Christian community.
What I have particularly in
mind is that while there is much talk
about taking Jesus as a key to the
interpretation of human nature, as it is often phrased, or to the meaning of human life, or to the point of man's existential situation, there is a lamentable tendency to stop there and not to go on to talk
about «the world» — by which Miss Emmet meant, I assume, the totality of things including physical nature; in other words the cosmos in its basic structure and its chief dynamic energy.
When I read
about Calvin and others ideas on what Gods Word says, the Arminian, Lytheran, Wesleyan, Unitarian and various Church denominations and their
interpretations, particularly when they hang their whole idea on one part of the Bible to prove how right they are, it affirms what I have always thought since before I was saved by God as well as after that amazing act of grace on His part, that man values and honors the
mind far above the heart.
«you are not interested in reading
about and rationalizing the real story of your Jesus» is a silly claim bearing in
mind the academic robustness required of me in studying theology at honours level and biblical
interpretation at masters, validated by the secular Aberdeen University in Scotland.
When we have seen that he does not invent incidents, that his main concern is with the concrete historical material
about Jesus, we can pretty confidently answer «yes» to the question, keeping in
mind the impossibility of separating what we call history and
interpretation.
Mormons, including Smith, have produced other writings & «
interpretations» of what God evidently changed His
mind about or «forgot» to add to the Bible - Pearl of Great Price & The Book of Mormon, to name just the 2 main ones.
fishon, I don't take passages
about «sexual immorality» that way and don't
mind at all them being read or preached, but my experience is that preachers name homosexuality specifically and teach things that not only are (in my opinion) and poor
interpretation of the Bible, but also things that could have no Biblical basis of support.
It was
about eight o'clock my time, and going through some of his
interpretations of the data and basically are you crazy, are you out of your
mind?
Freestyle was a turning point in a lot of people's
minds about contemporary black art, and one that catalyzed a kind of new vocabulary for both identity and
interpretation.
* According to the Berkeley group, the Earth's surface temperature will have risen (on average) slightly less than what indicated by NASA, NOAA and the Met Office * Differences will be on the edge of statistical significance, leaving a lot open to subjective
interpretation * Several attempts will be made by climate change conformists and True Believers to smear the work of BEST, and to prevent them from publishing their data * After publication, organised groups of people will try to cloud the issue to the point of leaving the public unsure
about what exactly was found by BEST * New questions will be raised regarding UHI, however the next IPCC assessment's first draft will be singularly forgetful of any peer - reviewed paper on the topic * We will all be left with a slightly - warming world, the only other certitude being that all mitigation efforts will be among the stupidest ideas that ever sprung to human
mind.