Not exact matches
Since 2008, Ed has served as Co-Principal Investigator (with Anthony Leiserowitz and Connie Roser - Renouf) of the Yale / George Mason University
Climate Change in the American Mind audience research project, which tracks public opinion about climate change, including the Global Warming's Six Americas audience se
Climate Change in the American
Mind audience research project, which tracks public
opinion about
climate change, including the Global Warming's Six Americas audience se
climate change, including the Global Warming's Six Americas audience segments.
But for those of you uninterested in buying and reading the book, you can actually find a similar -
minded opinion piece by Crichton criticizing
climate science (and everything from SETI and the «Drake Equation» to Carl Sagan in the process) here in the public domain.
And that is precisely what Iain Stewart did for in his series,
Climate Wars, which Cox holds up as an example of «drawing a clear distinction in the viewers
mind, between the peer - reviewed science and his
opinion».
You seem to have missed the distinction michael; the piece by Dr Curry is an
opinion piece based on her own experiences as a scientist, a
climate scientist and as someone who as actively tried to further the discussion - unless i'm mistake Dr Curry has clearly stated that she still thinks there's merit in the theory, but has issue with the methods and presentation (though leaving an open
mind for uncertainty natch #).
Keep both of these concepts in
mind the next time you see a handful of self proclaiming «
climate scientists» with dissenting
opinions.
I don't
mind scientists having an
opinion about what to do about
climate change issues, e.g., sequestration, nuclear, wind, solar etc..
Since 2008, Ed has served as Co-Principal Investigator (with Anthony Leiserowitz and Connie Roser - Renouf) of the Yale / George Mason University
Climate Change in the American Mind audience research project, which tracks public opinion about climate change, including the Global Warming's Six Americas audience se
Climate Change in the American
Mind audience research project, which tracks public
opinion about
climate change, including the Global Warming's Six Americas audience se
climate change, including the Global Warming's Six Americas audience segments.
The #ExxonKnew campaign has gained enormous traction in the public
mind and many want to know why the corporation started out as such an honest broker in the 1970s, conducting its own
climate science research, and then doing an about - face in the 1980s, blatantly denying the reality of global warming and working with other groups to manipulate public
opinion so as to thwart a rational public response.
He changed my
mind on the «information deficit model», the idea that to influence
opinions on
climate change the most important thing that you have to do is present the facts.
Environmental, energy, and global warming concern well may be on American's
minds — as recent
opinion polls
Climate Progress is parsing bear out — but collectively we're barely past admitting we have a problem, let alone starting the depth of societal soul searching the activist community would (rightly) like to see.