The ideas are thought of as though they were workbench parts and gears,
the minds on the analogy of separate cabinets in which the gears and parts are stored after they have been sorted.
Not exact matches
actually you do nt have to prove the many deities or Gods that they really exist, because they really had existed in their times, They are part of the evolutionary process for us humans to transcend to higher consciousness.To simplify the
analogy, when we were young and we are in the lower grade school, we were taught simple subjects not advance literatures but simple stories even mythicals, The same with religion, thousands of years ago when there was no science yet, primitive people had a religion, of course man made faiths to conform with their state of
mind or intellect.But later atfter thousands of years we evolve into a more educated people and so new concept of God again was presented to them, another man made concept, and this go
on and
on, until a few thiousand years ago.monotheism, Judaism, christianity, islam, buddhism, etc also evolved, But with the accelerated evolution, these faith again is threatend with obsolesencs because of of scientific developments and education.In panthroteistic faith, the future religion needs to conform to evolutionary process, This proves that God is always there guiding the change.And it his will that made this a reality in history since the begining of the universe 13 billion years ago, and this will continue to exist until He will completely fulfill His will to infinity, Thats PANTHROTHEISM, the futue, man made religion under His guidance through scientifiic evoluition after the Bi Bang
You seem to «privilege» your sense of rationality and logic — and cast the irrational and illogical (probably not analogical because you may incorporate
analogy into your sense of «logic» but it's illogical, descriptively) I actually see my rationality and logic (such as it is — hardly syllogistic) as always in the service of my attitude, outlook, frame of
mind — which is to say, my illogical and irrational belief & bias system — and my unconscious, of which my consciousness is merely tip - of - the - I's berg, or as some linguists said: a snowball
on the tip of the iceberg.
Each event is a momentary
mind - body understood
on the
analogy of the organism.
With this
analogy in
mind, Enns moves
on to apply it to the first of three Old Testament «problems» — the Old Testament and Ancient Near Eastern Literature — which will be the subject of next week's discussion.
Also the subdivisions all depend
on a single principle, Plato's
mind - body
analogy for the God - Cosmos relation, so that the choice among the sixteen is the basic one.20 It makes a square of four columns and four rows; thus we have four times four.
Hartshorne added a paragraph in A, expanding
on the reference: Plato's
mind - body
analogy, accepted by a number of modern theists before I came to my view has not, so far as I know; been carefully criticized.
You know, I don't really
mind the lamb
analogy being used
on us.
Entities in the world are assumed to be two stages removed from the familiar systems
on which the model is based: (1) gas molecules are not the «tiny elastic spheres» of the model (if we are not naive realists), and (2) «tiny elastic spheres» are not billiard balls (if we have kept negative
analogy in
mind).
«We have painstakingly drawn this graphic
analogy so that it will be clear to the discerning and fair -
minded Rivers people and Nigerians who the perpetrators of the arson
on Dr. Chidi Lloyd's country home are.
To describe the
mind - set of the college or university president embarking
on his or her first presidency, I often use the
analogy of a person standing at the end of the high diving board for the first time.
An
analogy that comes to
mind is that expecting all children in a year group to perform at the same level
on a test is like expecting all runners to reach the finish line together even though some started closer and had less far to run.
Love the
analogy to coaching, where we all have our eye
on the end in
mind, supporting each student, ideally working together to enrich the culture within we which we work, all learning.
The
analogy to this schol of thinking comes immediately in
mind and I am sure that you will understand what I mean because you come from fluid dynamics even if, unfortunately, it will be wasted
on most commenters amateurs of the 1D hypothesis.
OK, so the Business and Media Institute is hardly likely to be a bastion of objective, detached journalism, and you are welcome to make your own
minds about how low Kennedy was actually stooping with his
analogy, by reading his piece for Vanity Fair
on which the above report reports.