Sentences with phrase «mine on the convection»

I put 4 on a baking sheet and bake for 15 min on convection.
Cooked to perfection in 30 minutes on convection.
Baked for 50 minutes on convection bake at 350 in regular metal loaf pan.
Position a rack in the center of the oven and heat the oven to 325 °F on convection bake or to 350 °F without convection.
I froze the rest in hopes it'll reconstitute for another quiche my 9 ″ quiche did 60 minutes on convection bake and another 20 covered with foil.
I made this wonderful bread for the second time today... I omitted the honey this time... I also baked it on the convection setting in my oven at 350 (auto - converted to 325 in the convection) for 45 minutes and then let it cool in the pan for an hour... It was perfect, no soft spot or hole in the middle at all!
I roast fresh red peppers from my garden in my oven on convection roast setting.
Bake 8 - 12 minutes until lightly golden (8 minutes on a convection oven, 12 minutes for a regular oven).
One other note, my cooking time was much shorter: 8 minutes at 350 degrees on convection.
I really need to know your thoughts on convection in baking.
Maybe on convection?
Heat oven to 325 degrees on convection (or 350 without convection).
My oven set on convection cooked them in 14 minutes.
Preheat oven to 350 degrees on convection setting.
Cooked for the recommended time but on the convection setting (I find for these dense quick breads this works better for me at higher altitude.)
(baked mine at 300 degrees on convection setting)
I put these in on convection mode and they were perfect after 12 minutes!
Bake at 400º on bake or 375º on convection bake for about 20 minutes or until lightly browned and crisp.
Preheat oven to 375 on convection setting.
Place in a single layer on a baking sheet lined with parchment paper and bake on the convection bake setting at 350 ° or 375 ° on a regular bake setting for about 20 minutes or until lightly browned and cooked through.
The second time I used a shallow metal baking pan and baked them on convection for longer time.
I only cooked them for about 20 minutes on convection bake, and with less flour they made 11 muffins.
For both reasons, rather than rely on convection, you really do need to manually mix the heated formula, and check the temperature after mixing.
That water vapor rose within «rocket dust storms» — storms with rapid vertical movement — on convection currents similar to those in some storm clouds on Earth, says study coauthor Nicholas Heavens, an astronomer at Hampton University in Virginia.
«Warm summers could weaken ocean circulation: Long - term observations reveal the influence of increased surface freshening on convection in the subpolar North Atlantic.»
Hesse says constraints on convection might explain why CO2 dissolves much more slowly in saline aquifers at Bravo Dome than previously estimated, at a rate of 0.1 gram per square meter per year.
Wang, W., and M. Schlesinger, 1999: The dependence on convection parameterization of the tropical intraseasonal oscillation simulated by the UIUC 11 - layer atmospheric GCM.
I also had to cook it longer, even on convection.
Turn on your convection fan if you have one.
20 min at 300 was definitely not enough to get these cooked, let alone crisp... and that was on convection.
By comparison, conventional saunas must rely only on indirect means of heat: first, on convection (air currents) and then, conduction (direct contact of hot air with the skin) to produce its heating effect.
*** I found baking potatoes in our toaster oven on the convection setting is quicker, more economical and yields better results.
A powerpoint lesson on convection.
On convection clouds form and the latent (moist) energy is converted to sensible heat upon condensation.
Earlier I pointed out that it could / should be better to specifically block solar IR, or in particular those wavelengths absorbed by H2O vapor, other gases and clouds, in the troposphere, rather than block all solar wavelengths indiscriminately (because selective shading could reduce the effect on convection and precipitation — caveats about cloud and H2O distribution... etc.).
You really need to account for the vertical structure of temperature (the lapse rate), and if you want your model to get a number of basic things right you need to include spectrally grey absorbers — plus the additional mixing in the troposphere (which depends on convection, and hence affects water vapour feedbacks) etc....
CO2's direct influence on convection (via gas properties) is almost certainly negligible; it's the radiative influence on the temperature gradient that matters.
Some had regions of minimum warming in the North Atlantic and Ross Sea due to positive feedbacks: a local effect on convection in the Ross Sea and a non-local impact on the meridional circulation in the North Atlantic.
However, model physics process representations that are supposed to account for the eddy moisture transport effects on convection significantly underestimate them compared to simulations that explicitly resolved eddy moisture transport without using convective representations.
They do relatively sell on Rosby waves and seemingly quit poorly on convection.
The dynamics of the system are governed by the lapse rate which is «anchored» to the ground and whose variations are dependent not only on convection, latent heat changes and conduction but also radiative transfer.
This effectively puts a lid on the convection.
A phenomenon known as sensitive dependence to initial conditions since Edward Lorenz's work on convection models in the 1960's.
It is warmer than the rising air coming up from the surface below, so it effectively puts a lid on convection.
But you're making up the result when you say it depends on convection so that you can then go on to suggest a rate of convection has an impact.
Because you are taking issue with my model and explanation you appear to be saying that (for some reason) the increase in temperature of the top few microns due to a (hypothetical) increase in DLR will have zero affect on the convection from below.
You suggest I'm saying «you appear to be saying that (for some reason) the increase in temperature of the top few microns due to a (hypothetical) increase in DLR will have zero effect on the convection from below.»
I agree that there needs to be included a relationship between dh and T and its going to be complex but I do nt agree that its going to depend on your convection equation to any great extent.
I'm very pleased to see a lot of people now picking up on the convection / lapse rate connection.
No doubt, in that strange world, commenters and bloggers would decry the resulting over-emphasis on convection..
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z