The UN's IPCC and its coterie of green - sharia «scientists» have long pursued a political agenda that requires all climate change and
global warming to be a result of human CO2 emissions, and in addition, any solar
impact on temperatures is absolutely
minimal - yet, the empirical evidence does not support said political agenda, including the BEST maximum
temperature dataset
E.g., research assumes greenhouse gas emissions cause warming without explicitly stating humans are the cause»... carbon sequestration in soil is important for mitigating
global climate change» (4a) No position Does not address or mention the cause of
global warming (4b) Uncertain Expresses position that human's role
on recent
global warming is uncertain / undefined «While the extent of human - induced
global warming is inconclusive...» (5) Implicit rejection Implies humans have had a
minimal impact on global warming without saying so explicitly E.g., proposing a natural mechanism is the main cause of
global warming»... anywhere from a major portion to all of the warming of the 20th century could plausibly result from natural causes according to these results» (6) Explicit rejection without quantification Explicitly minimizes or rejects that humans are causing
global warming»... the
global temperature record provides little support for the catastrophic view of the greenhouse effect» (7) Explicit rejection with quantification Explicitly states that humans are causing less than half of
global warming «The human contribution to the CO2 content in the atmosphere and the increase in
temperature is negligible in comparison with other sources of carbon dioxide emission»»