The U.S. Department of Education has blocked an attempt by Pennsylvania's Education Secretary to evaluate state charter schools using a more lenient method for calculating AYP, the «adequate yearly progress» measurement that determines whether schools have met
the minimum academic standards under the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB).
These requirements represent
the minimum academic standards for eligibility.
Confirms that the college or career school meets certain
minimum academic standards, as defined by an accrediting body recognized by the U.S. Department of Education.
Not exact matches
«At
minimum, these policies will require all
academic and administrative units meet both SUNY and MSCHE
standards appropriate to their units.»
The Four Corners states had consistent failings in the eyes of the NACSA raters: None of the states» laws had a renewal
standard tied to
academic performance or a default closure provision, under which a school would lose its charter «by default» if it did not meet a
minimum standard of performance.
«To be clear, higher
academic standards are necessary, and the rigor of the Common Core State
Standards must be the new
minimum in classrooms.»
Kevin Hall: At a
minimum, a high - quality charter school produces a vast majority of students who meet or exceed
academic standards regardless of their ethnic or socioeconomic background and who are well prepared for postsecondary success.
According to the U.S. Department of Education, the purpose of Title 1 funding, «is to ensure that all children have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high quality education and reach, at
minimum, proficiency on challenging state
academic achievement
standards and state
academic assessments.»
The purpose of Title I is to ensure that every student has access to an equal, fair, and high - quality education that meets, at a
minimum, proficiency on challenging state
academic achievement
standards and assessments.
«is to ensure that all children have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high - quality education and reach, at a
minimum, proficiency on challenging State
academic achievement
standards and state
academic assessments.»
These
standards are to be used as a
minimum threshold by every school district in the state in order to establish some consistency in
academic content statewide.
In conjunction with the CCSA Member Council and in consultation with technical experts, CCSA developed an Accountability Framework to set
minimum standards of
academic performance at time of renewal.
The Title I funds are used to provide supplemental core
academic instruction, instructional support, and parental involvement and engagement to schools to ensure that all children have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high - quality education and reach, at a
minimum, proficiency on challenging State
academic achievement
standards and state
academic assessments.
With school funding constantly hanging precariously on the edge of being whittled down to nothing, schools have had to become very creative about how they still maintain a
minimum standard of
academic excellence while also preparing students to be 21st century learners.
You will be required to present a
minimum number of
academic, confined water and open water sessions up to Instructor level
standards.
Specific
academic departments and specific employers may have higher
minimum standards.
Employers look for a high
standard of
academic achievement, often requiring a
minimum 2:1 in a related degree.
To qualify, applicants must be enrolled in at least three credits at UAA, have a
minimum cumulative GPA of 2.8, and meet «Satisfactory
Academic Progress» program
standards.
(a) Document a
minimum of twenty - four hours of
academic preparation or board approved continuing education coursework in counselor supervision training including training six hours in each area as follows: (i) Assessment, evaluation and remediation which includes initial, formative and summative assessment of supervisee knowledge, skills and self - awareness; components of evaluation e.g. evaluation criteria and expectations, supervisory procedures, methods for monitoring (both direct and indirect observation) supervisee performance, formal and informal feedback mechanisms, and evaluation processes (both summative and formative), and processes and procedures for remediation of supervisee skills, knowledge, and personal effectiveness and self - awareness; (ii) Counselor development which includes models of supervision, learning models, stages of development and transitions in supervisee / supervisor development, knowledge and skills related to supervision intervention options, awareness of individual differences and learning styles of supervisor and supervisee, awareness and acknowledgement of cultural differences and multicultural competencies needed by supervisors, recognition of relational dynamics in the supervisory relationship, and awareness of the developmental process of the supervisory relationship itself; (iii) Management and administration which includes organizational processes and procedures for recordkeeping, reporting, monitoring of supervisee's cases, collaboration, research and evaluation; agency or institutional policies and procedures for handling emergencies, case assignment and case management, roles and responsibilities of supervisors and supervisees, and expectations of supervisory process within the institution or agency; institutional processes for managing multiple roles of supervisors, and summative and formative evaluation processes; and (iv) Professional responsibilities which includes ethical and legal issues in supervision includes dual relationships, competence, due process in evaluation, informed consent, types of supervisor liability, privileged communication, consultation, etc.; regulatory issues include Ohio laws governing the practice of counseling and counseling supervision, professional
standards and credentialing processes in counseling, reimbursement eligibility and procedures, and related institutional or agency procedures.