However, increased
mining difficulty means that it is harder to increase the supply of the cryptocurrency, which, when compared to rising demand, may cause an upward movement in the price of the cryptocurrency.
Not exact matches
However, the relatively low
difficulty of Litecoin for much of the last year combined with what had been a smaller
mining community
means that some early miners may hold large concentrations of Litecoin.
I think you mistake the historical trend of adjustments to the bitcoin
difficulty generally being upward, with the actual mechanism where the
difficulty is adjusted to keep the global
mean - time - to - valid - block constant, because of the other historical trend of
mining power going up.
This would in turn
means that the block rewards would be even less valuable,
difficulty would needs to be even lower for miners to hop on, and miners would be able to
mine the 2016 blocks even faster next time.
Of course, the genius of the Bitcoin protocol
means that as hashing power decreases,
difficulty adjustments take place which make it easier to
mine the coins and verify the transactions again.
This
means that the
mining difficulty will be adjusted in a similar way to that of Bitcoin such that no more than 21 million coins can ever be
mined.
Initially, a low
mining difficulty indicates that a cryptocurrency is easy to mine, which
means that it is easier to increase the supply of that cryptocurrency, which would place a down pressure on its price.