Gill Andrews offers advice to improve your author website (I made
some minor changes to this site as soon as I read his article!).
Even making
minor changes to your site can end up taking a considerable amount of time and money.
They make
some minor change to the site and then there is another breach that they blame on the change.
Not exact matches
It would be very difficult for me
to explain my conception of the Holy Spirit without explaining my thoughts on the Trinity, so here's the whole package, culled from one of my previous posts elsewhere on this
site, with a few
minor changes and clarifications:
We usually try
to do a major update
to the reviews at least once a year and then do
minor updates as we come across any new information about the dating
site (i.e. price
changes, new features, etc.).
If there are a lot of volunteered travel blogs
to review, please understand that if your
site feedback or suggested
changes are
minor (which is good, after all!)
Credit Card and Social Security numbers were not involved in the relatively
minor breach, which revolved around the website for the game Neverwinter Nights, but if you've ever registered on that
site, you may want
to change you passwords just
to be safe.
This has been discussed at several blog
sites, such as https://deepclimate.org/2009/06/05/uah-annual-cycle-continues-in-2009/ Interestingly, the UAH data seems
to show a much higher seasonal impact than RSS, which only shows a
minor seasonal
change.
I have only
minor comments: At line 88 «the USHCN has a significant portion of stations affected by such
changes, with approximately 10 % of the USHCN remaining classified as «well -
sited» using the Leroy (1999) classification method» I had
to read twice
to see that the «significant portion» wasn't the «10 %» cited, but the other 90 % (I think).
This seems like a
minor functional
change, however, most often when I go
to the CanLII
site, I am using it
to locate a specific document that I know something about — either decision or legislation.