Student performance in charter schools was significantly lower than regular nearby schools in just five states with about 30 percent of national charter enrollment, mostly
minority children from poor families.
Not exact matches
While Coates doesn't touch on education policy, he essentially makes a strong historical case for why reformers (especially increasingly erstwhile conservatives in the movement) must go back to embracing accountability measures and a strong federal role in education policymaking that, along with other changes in American society, are key to helping
children from poor and
minority households (as well as their
families and communities) attain economic and social equality.
In the wake of the Supreme Court's hostility to race - conscious integration and in recognition of the disproportionate number of
minority, and especially black,
children from poor families, localities have adopted plans to integrate schools by income instead of race.
The conviction jump - started the much - needed discussion over expanding inter-district public school choice and forced a new discussion about ending zip code education practices that condemn
poor and
minority children to the worst American public education offers (and keeps middle - class
families from improving their own options).
Yet far too many
children, especially those
from poor and
minority families, are placed at risk by school practices that are based on a sorting paradigm in which some students receive high - expectations instruction while the rest are relegated to lower quality education and lower quality futures.
As expected,
minority and
children from low - income
family have
poor chances of being enrolled in high - quality education programs.
As outlined in the previous section, a substantial
minority (16 %) of ten year - old
children in GUS couple
families perceive low levels of supportiveness
from fathers, and are categorised as having a «
poor» father -
child relationship.