With OSEP funding, the National Research Council at the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) is undertaking a two - year study of the representation of
minority children in special education and gifted and talented programs.
Not exact matches
Modern
education seems to have had little effect
in breaking down sectarian barriers between Shi'as and Sunnis since, as with all
minority religions, the Shi'as take
special interest
in the religious training of their
children.
If you go by the raw numbers, it looks like
children of
minority families are more likely to end up
in special education programs.
And it put a
special focus on ensuring that states and schools boost the performance of certain groups of students, such as English - language learners, students
in special education, and poor and
minority children, whose achievement, on average, trails their peers.
And they must report the results, for both the student population as a whole and for particular «subgroups» of students, including English - learners and students
in special education, racial
minorities, and
children from low - income families.
The size of the disparities
in special education service receipt between otherwise similar white and
minority children are very large.
As has been found
in gifted
education, we find that white
children are more likely to receive
special education services than similarly achieving racial or ethnic
minority children.
White
children are much more likely than otherwise similar racial and ethnic
minority children to receive
special education services in the U.S. Ensuring equity in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) means making sure all children with disabilities are able to access the services to which they have a civ
education services
in the U.S. Ensuring equity
in the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act (IDEA) means making sure all children with disabilities are able to access the services to which they have a civ
Education Act (IDEA) means making sure all
children with disabilities are able to access the services to which they have a civil right.
We sometimes find that
minority children are over-represented
in special education before adjusting for potential confounds, but never after the confounds are controlled for.
In both 1997 and 2004, Congress amended the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) to require states to monitor and report the extent to which minority children are over-represented in special educatio
In both 1997 and 2004, Congress amended the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act (IDEA) to require states to monitor and report the extent to which minority children are over-represented in special e
Education Act (IDEA) to require states to monitor and report the extent to which
minority children are over-represented
in special educatio
in special educationeducation.
The problem of
minority overrepresentation
in special education is particularly troubling, according to the researchers, because of the growing use of high stakes tests that burden poorly taught
children with diploma denial and grade level retention.
«As a result,
minority children deemed eligible for
special education are
in jeopardy of being discriminated against on the grounds of both race and disability.»
There are a range of critical issues, such as: the implementation of the reauthorized ESEA (now called The Every Student Succeeds Act) which includes new flexibility for states
in designing state standards and accountability systems as well as a hard cap on the number of students with the most significant cognitive disabilities taking alternate assessments on alternate standards; regulations on disproportionate identification of
minority students to
special education; and, the goal to transition more disadvantaged students into college and careers that will have a significant impact on some of the most vulnerable
children.
Thanks
in part to a board of
education dominated by conservative reformers such as Andy Smarick of the American Enterprise Institute and former Thomas B. Fordham Institute President Chester Finn Jr. (the latter of whom presided over the think tank's initial activism against the Obama - era guidance), the Old Line State only plans to intervene when suspension levels for poor,
minority, and
special ed - labeled
children are three times higher than that of other peers.
I probably cover Lakewood's morally and fiscally bankrupt schools too often, but this Ocean County school district that enrolls almost entirely Latino and Black low - income students pushes all my
education reform buttons: tyranny of the majority (
in this case the ultra-Orthodox residents who control the municipal government and the school board); lack of accountability; lack of school choice for poor kids of color but anything goes (at public expense) for
children of the ruling class; discrimination against
minority special education students.
The CORE districts also couldn't offer a specific plan for how they would provide comprehensive college - preparatory courses aligned to the standards to poor and
minority children in their schools, as well as English Language Learners and
children trapped
in the nation's
special education ghettos.
To repeat, the Common Core SBAC pass / fail rate is intentionally set to ensure that the vast majority of public school students are deemed failures, and making the situation even more unfair, the Common Core SBAC scheme particularly targets
minority students, poor students,
children who are not proficient
in English and students with disabilities that require
special education services.
Cultural Diversity E604: Assessment of Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students for
Special Education Eligibility (2000) E584: Critical Behaviors and Strategies for Teaching Culturally Diverse Students (1999) E650: Diagnosing Communication Disorders
in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students (2003) E500: Empowering Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students with Learning Problems (1991) E500s: Reforzando a los alumnos Diversos Culturalmente y Lingüí con Aprendizaje (1999) E596: Five Strategies to Reduce Overrepresentation of Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students
in Special Education (2000) E520: Identifying and Serving Recent Immigrant
Children Who Are Gifted (1993) E601: Infusing Multicultural Content into the Curriculum for Gifted Students (2000) E589: The Implications of Culture on Developmental Delay (1999) E566: Reducing the Disproportionate Representation of
Minority Students
in Special Education (1998) E544: Underachievement Among Gifted
Minority Students: Problems and Promises (1997) E614: Cultural Reciprocity Aids Collaboration with Families (2001)
Even though schools continue stressing the need for inclusive
education for immigrants,
minority representatives, and
children with
special needs, there is an evident gap
in the full integration of diversity into the educational system.