If that is the case, why are
judgements always being appealed, overturned, re-appealed, and subsequently overturned again, be it via small - claims
courts / provincial Superior Courts (single person judgements) or via provincial Supreme Courts / Supreme Court of Canada (multi-person / panel judgements), the latter often turning on minority decisions; they still can't all agree, and all of this is based upon the vagaries of precedents based upon commo
courts / provincial Superior
Courts (single person judgements) or via provincial Supreme Courts / Supreme Court of Canada (multi-person / panel judgements), the latter often turning on minority decisions; they still can't all agree, and all of this is based upon the vagaries of precedents based upon commo
Courts (single person
judgements) or via provincial Supreme
Courts / Supreme Court of Canada (multi-person / panel judgements), the latter often turning on minority decisions; they still can't all agree, and all of this is based upon the vagaries of precedents based upon commo
Courts / Supreme
Court of Canada (multi-person / panel
judgements), the latter often turning on
minority decisions; they still can't all agree, and all
of this is based upon the vagaries
of precedents based upon common law?