But after its passage into law, white, black and Hispanic students all made gains and the widening of the white -
minority test score gap was reversed.
Not exact matches
In fact, the researchers report that «if similar success could be achieved for all
minority students nationwide, it could close the
gap between white and
minority test scores by at least a third, possibly by more than half.»
For instance, in an April 28, 2004, column, Winerip described a school in Florida as unfairly penalized by NCLB, but he failed to mention that the school reported low overall
test scores and had significant achievement
gaps between white and
minority students.
Over the past few years, the districts profiled in the report — the Houston Independent School District, the Sacramento City Unified School District, the Charlotte - Mecklenburg school system in North Carolina, and the Chancellor's District in New York City, a special 25,000 - student district of low - performing schools — have improved
test scores and narrowed achievement
gaps between
minority and white students.
The authors of the funding study report that the school finance reforms they studied actually did not reduce socio - economic and racial
gaps in
test scores because low - income and
minority students are not very concentrated in the districts that enjoyed spending increases.
A study of
test scores in each of the city's public elementary schools finds that diversity does not erase achievement
gaps between white and
minority students.
And yet because achievement -
gap mania has distilled «education reform» to measures that raise the
test scores of poor and
minority students, the solutions to what ails American education more broadly simply aren't being developed — in part because the question is hardly ever asked.
Many of the charter schools in our study aspire to boost
minority achievement, so a natural benchmark for charter effectiveness is the black - white
test score gap.
The current strategy that schools alone can do the job of reducing social inequalities, including the
test score gap between
minorities and whites, is simply flawed.
The third problem, Ho explains, raises concerns about achievement
gaps — for example, average differences between
test scores of white or higher - income students and
minority or poor students.
The proposed reforms, outside and inside schools — to reduce the
test -
score gap between whites and poor
minorities; to help poor
minority families increase their income through steady work at livable wages and then their children's
test scores will improve; to establish research - proven reading programs for every single, poor, or
minority child; to give each kid a laptop computer — are endless and uncertain in their outcomes.
Gaps in
test scores between
minority and white students have also narrowed over the past 30 years for some groups, especially Latino students.
Reform efforts in this state are paying off in higher
test scores and lowering the achievement
gap between
minority and white students.
The latest
scores were especially disappointing because
score gaps between white and
minority students did not diminish at all since the last time the math
test was administered, in 2007.
Among the facts from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Fourth Grade Reading report cited by FairTest: — There has been no gain in NAEP grade four reading performance nationally since 1992 despite a huge increase in state - mandated
testing; — NAEP
scores in southern states, which test the most and have the highest stakes attached to their state testing programs, have declined; — The NAEP score gap between white children and those from African American and Hispanic families has increased, even though schools serving low - income and minority - group children put the most emphasis on testing; and — Scores of children eligible for free lunch programs have dropped since
scores in southern states, which
test the most and have the highest stakes attached to their state
testing programs, have declined; — The NAEP
score gap between white children and those from African American and Hispanic families has increased, even though schools serving low - income and
minority - group children put the most emphasis on
testing; and —
Scores of children eligible for free lunch programs have dropped since
Scores of children eligible for free lunch programs have dropped since 1996.
In fact, the
test score gap between low - income
minorities and affluent whites was reduced by 86 percent in math and 66 percent in English.
The data, part of the benchmark
test known as the National Assessment of Educational Progress, show that New York City fourth graders have made progress in closing the
gap between their
scores and the state and national results in reading, despite the higher percentages of poor and
minority students in the city.
When over 80 % of our children can not read proficiently by the third grade, it is a travesty of enormous proportions, particularly when compared with the TAKS reading
test results (even after a significant standard deviation adjustment), their comparison with national norm - referenced
test scores, and the wide
gap between
scores of white and
minority children.
«The magnitude of the
test -
score gains from one year are equivalent to 10 percent to 20 percent of the achievement
gap between
minority and white students,» reads the report.
In a 2010 research review, Harvard University's Susan Eaton noted that racial segregation in schools has such a severe impact on the
test score -
gap that it outweighs the positive effects of a higher family income for
minority students.
«The harm to California's low - income students of a short
gap without a state standardized
test score is dwarfed by the life - long effects that millions of low - income and
minority students nationwide will experience as a result of the Department's failure to monitor and enforce their right to equitable access to qualified, experienced, and effective teachers.»
They believe that a uniform curriculum will lead to improved
test scores and higher graduation and college admission rates while closing achievement
gaps between
minorities and whites.
«The harm to California's low - income students of a short
gap without a state standardized
test score is dwarfed by the life - long effects that millions of low - income and
minority students nationwide will experience as a result of the Department's failure to monitor and enforce their right... Read More
We use panel data in Washington State to study the extent to which teacher assignments between fourth and eighth grade explain
gaps between advantaged and disadvantaged students — as defined by underrepresented
minority status (URM) and eligibility for free or reduced price lunch (FRL)-- in their eighth grade math
test scores and high school course taking.