In the report released yesterday, ORI identified six instances in which Hauser engaged in research
misconduct in research funded by the National Institutes of Health.
Not exact matches
The National Science Foundation (NSF)
in Arlington, Virginia, has decided to double down on its implementation of a congressionally mandated policy aimed at reducing
research misconduct among NSF -
funded scientists, despite a new report that notes problems with the agency's approach.
Being listed
in an Office of
Research Integrity
misconduct filing also correlated with a significant, sustained drop
in funding.
The researchers also estimated the total
funding for all NIH grants that
in any way supported
research reported
in papers retracted for
misconduct.
Even with such corrections, Fang said, «Our study suggests that
research misconduct does not involve a large percentage of
research funding in the United States.»
Instead, it cited the process already
in place to handle such disputes: ORI investigates reports of
research misconduct at federally
funded institutions, and if it finds a researcher has committed
misconduct, it sends a «charge letter» outlining its finding and suggesting sanctions.
Koziol claims that «Yale broke its contract with her by failing to report her case to the Office of
Research Integrity (ORI), the U.S. agency that investigates misconduct in federally funded biomedical research
Research Integrity (ORI), the U.S. agency that investigates
misconduct in federally
funded biomedical
researchresearch.»
Research misconduct (RM) is a breach of OSR standards and of those expected by OSR funders and sponsors, a betrayal of the trust placed in OSR by the public, and the failure to comply with the high expectations of the scholarly community for research integrity (RI) and accurate and experimentally - supported commun
Research misconduct (RM) is a breach of OSR standards and of those expected by OSR
funders and sponsors, a betrayal of the trust placed
in OSR by the public, and the failure to comply with the high expectations of the scholarly community for
research integrity (RI) and accurate and experimentally - supported commun
research integrity (RI) and accurate and experimentally - supported communication.
Research misconduct is a breach of Ospedale San Raffaele standards and of those expected from its funders and sponsors, a betrayal of the trust placed in Ospedale San Raffaele by the public, and the failure to comply with the high expectations of the scholarly community for research integrity and accurate and experimentally - supported commun
Research misconduct is a breach of Ospedale San Raffaele standards and of those expected from its
funders and sponsors, a betrayal of the trust placed
in Ospedale San Raffaele by the public, and the failure to comply with the high expectations of the scholarly community for
research integrity and accurate and experimentally - supported commun
research integrity and accurate and experimentally - supported communication.
Based on the findings of an investigation by Columbia University (CU) and additional analysis conducted by the Office of
Research Integrity (ORI) during its oversight review, ORI found that Bengu Sezen, former graduate student, Department of Chemistry, CU, engaged in misconduct in science in research funded by National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), grant R01
Research Integrity (ORI) during its oversight review, ORI found that Bengu Sezen, former graduate student, Department of Chemistry, CU, engaged
in misconduct in science
in research funded by National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), grant R01
research funded by National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), grant R01 GM60326.