Sentences with phrase «mislead policymakers and the public»

«The evidence before the committee leads to one inescapable conclusion: the Bush administration has engaged in a systematic effort to manipulate climate change science and mislead policymakers and the public about the dangers of global warming,» the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform wrote in its report on the matter in December 2007.

TNR opponents have, for years, misled policymakers and the public — not only about the «threats» posed by free - roaming cats, but about their plan going forward (again, assuming they actually have a plan).

For years now, they've used their credentials and organizational imprimatur to mislead policymakers and the public not only about the «threats» posed by free - roaming cats, but with their suggestion — nothing more than a vague implication, of course — that they have a feasible alternative.

The evidence before the Committee leads to one inescapable conclusion: the Bush Administration has engaged in a systematic effort to manipulate climate change science and mislead policymakers and the public about the dangers of global warming.

The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Administration concluded that the Bush Administration has engaged in a systematic effort to manipulate climate change science and mislead policymakers and the public about the dangers of global warming.

Not exact matches

Although one might be able to secure short - term gains this way, misleading the public and policymakers almost always backfires.

Neither is the sloppy reporting that allows the agency to mislead policymakers and the general public.

According to Kelly Sims of Ozone Action, «Efforts by Fred Singer and others to cast doubt on the most thorough, sophisticated and internationally - based consensus on climate change is part of a well - coordinated plan to mislead the public and policymakers.»

Their combined adjustment «methodology» has certainly mislead the public and policymakers, which has added to the growing mistrust that the public has for politicians, scientists and bureaucrats.

One of the world's foremost experts takes the large insurance companies and NOAA to task for brazenly misleading the public and policymakers about global disaster trends.

Even just acknowledging more openly the incredible magnitude of the deep structural uncertainties that are involved in climate - change analysis — and explaining better to policymakers that the artificial crispness conveyed by conventional IAM - based CBAs [Integrated Assessment Model — Cost Benefit Analyses] here is especially and unusually misleading compared with more ordinary non-climate-change CBA situations — might go a long way toward elevating the level of public discourse concerning what to do about global warming.