Sentences with phrase «miss any points which»

To argue about Lucifer being the father of the Jews would be to miss the point which is the context in which Jesus addressed those who were listening to him.

As the for the rest of the game I think Rupert is missing the point which is that having been well beaten at City we needed not to lose this game more than we needed to win.

I thought he missed the point which was called Color and Form, or in British Colour and Form.

But you missed my point which is that we should look at the data from time to time with an eye to testing a hypothesis rather that depend on admittedly incomplete computer models.

This «comment» misses the point which seems to be fairly typical of the sort of apologia rationalising / justifying / excusing / cheering Peter Gleicks actions post facto.

Re # 185 Willis you miss the point which is in response to the use of Tao's paper on N - S equations from a mathematical perspective (he freely admits that CFD is «beyond his expertise»).

You missed my point which is that the alternative of government censorship is worse.

Don't miss any points which highlight your skills and traits.

Not exact matches

Not only did he help us lay out a plan (which allowed us to meet year - end tax obligations), he pointed out several other items on our return where we had been missing out on an opportunity to save.

To see how this works, all you have to do is take a look at any Trump interaction with his supporters, whether through Twitter or Facebook (including his «Trump TV» broadcasts, which critics have attacked as low quality, thereby missing the point).

Which means researchers now know what to look for so that we don't also miss this vital ice sheet passing the point of no return.

She points to offerings like the new Oral - B Bluetooth toothbrush, which records your time brushed and the parts you've missed, or SK - II's Magic Ring, which measures your skin's age, as examples of the return to P&G's technical superiority.

It missed only one massive point which is that the EU and China have no strategic conflicts, but much to gain once OBI becomes a reality.

The CEO talked about the Internet riches harnessing that technology could bring Tribune by pointing to the example of Buzzfeed, though that comparison misses many of the almost innumerable differences between a legacy newspaper company — even if one with the time and money to really «transform» itself — and a venture - juiced, digital - only, social news success, which is itself experiencing a bit of a stumble.

This thinking completely misses the point of being an entrepreneur, which is freedom.

Adding to this new information is some research conducted by Womenable way back in 2007, Mapping the Missing Middle: Determining the Desire and Dimensions of Second - Stage Women Business Owners, which not only raised the point that not enough policy and programmatic attention was being paid to established women - owned firms that had not yet cracked the million - dollar revenue barrier, but sized this population at between 16 % (if defined to include firms with employees or between $ 100,000 and $ 1 million in revenues) and fully 91 % (if having employees and revenues over $ 100,000 was not a criterion) of the entire women - owned business population.

Third and finally, the traditional story misses the real function of private banks, which is to solve an information problem in the purest Hayekian senses. That is, banks are or should be specialists in risk assessment and risk taking. They should know their client, understand the local market and have their pulse on the broad economy. Arguably, if properly structured, they can and should do this better than other entities such as governments. In other words, the proper role of banks should be underwriting — lend money, hold the debt, and bear the risk. Which is a long - winded way of getting to the main point of this which is to solve an information problem in the purest Hayekian senses. That is, banks are or should be specialists in risk assessment and risk taking. They should know their client, understand the local market and have their pulse on the broad economy. Arguably, if properly structured, they can and should do this better than other entities such as governments. In other words, the proper role of banks should be underwriting — lend money, hold the debt, and bear the risk. Which is a long - winded way of getting to the main point of this Which is a long - winded way of getting to the main point of this post.

And, while GDPR advocates have pointed to the lobbying Google and Facebook have done against the law as evidence that it will be effective, that is to completely miss the point: of course neither company wants to incur the costs entailed in such significant regulation, which will absolutely restrict the amount of information they can collect.

This farm bill seems to have missed the main point of it which is «FARM».

As you can see, conversations about medical ethics can get complex and circuitous very quickly (like many socio - political issues do)-- which is precisely the point that most of us miss.

In short, you missed my whole point, which was that morality is not the only purpose for faith and, perhaps, not even the most important thing about faith.

1) I think you missed my point, which is to say that you say Mary is a descendent of David, and how do you know this?

Fred You missed my point, which is understandable as I hit «POST» too soon.

The Parable of the Prodigal Son is really the Parable of the Loving Father, but we seem to always have to make everything, even the Scriptures about us which, of course, causes us to miss the whole point of the story.

And when you try to explain that you are not disagree with God, but that you just understand the Bible differently, then they start accusing you of not believing in inspiration, or not believing the Bible is inerrant, or any number of things which completely miss the entire point.

I fail to see how that response has anything to do with the point that I was trying to make, and, seeing as how you seem to have missed my postings intention entirely, I will not bother reading too deeply into your thoughtful analysis of my commentary in return, which would no doubt be an engaging and intellectual adventure.

while I'd be glad to enter into a discussion about that (considering the early church reject Tatian's Diatesseron — which offered a «harmony» of the gospels into one account), it misses the more foundational point.

in everyday conversation (not in the doctor's office), a response which sounds like a medical report fits the apparent literal sense of the question, but misses the point entirely.

> You missed the point, what is the point of stealing a body to promote an idea which, one the thieves don't believe and two the potential audience is not going to believe in or is looking for.

But then he entirely misses the point that Christians maintain, which is that Jesus the Christ came to impart his righteousness upon us, who can not achieve it on our own.

They believe that Jesus was born of Adam who came down from heaven to impregnate Mary, and that God Himself used to be a man like us, who progressed higher and higher until He became a god, which we will become if we work hard to be good enough.They have a form of righteousness, but miss the whole point of true salvation — trusting in Jesus Christ and His finished work on the cross to save them.

I think that Mr. Bottum hears their tone and misses their point because he assumes that the United States represents the «Christian alternative to the sacrificial logic by which mythic cultures are founded.»

If I begin by saying, «As I said to the whole class...,» they look at me as if I've missed the point — which indeed I have.

The point, which she apparently missed, is that Jesus extrapolated his position about limiting the number of partners in a sexual union to two based on the twoness of the sexes, «male and female,» which in turn establishes a male - female prerequisite as foundational.

Missing from his assessment are the countersigns of renewal and the promising directions pointed by John Paul II which play such a large part in, for instance, George Weigel's The Courage to Be Catholic, which covers most of the same territory.

Amid all the flurry, articles, tracks, rebuttal tracks, podcasts and discussion that have popped up to address the #CHHbeef phenomenon (which is barely two weeks old), perhaps the most important point is consistently missed.

The point, of course, you can't miss: If there's a price for which you'll sell yourself (in any sense), then you've already sold yourself.

I find this article completely missing the point — It asks us to pick a set of beliefs and principles as a group which is the opposite of what this groups wants and needs.

Councillor Toby Neal at Nottingham City Council was quoted by the Nottingham Post as saying: «Whilst respecting the court's decision, I feel the judge has missed the point of us bringing this action, which was to protect people from feeling bullied and intimidated while accessing hospital services - something we don't welcome in our city.»

Is «fiction» but a monopoly thru which Atheismistics may Flourish with Secularisms» Pathogens as they go hand in hand lolly - gaggling and persecuting Christendom's Believers of Monotheism that does Ordain rather Openly Proclaim Free Will to ALL or am I missing a Point?

Maybe I am missing the point (which is highly possible) but it seems to me, that there are Christ followers, and those who aren't Christ followers.

You missed the point pal, which I expect.

True, we may always miss him, because there is no definite point which we might indicate and say: There he is.

I can understand making the point that the people of Ferguson should be invited to forgive what they perceived as a wrong on the part of the officer...... but for you to make the assumption and then state that the Officer's action was «wrong» (if that is what you meant to say) is not something I can agree with, not without your full rationale (which maybe I missed from an earlier post)....

But the sophistication of liberation theologies is missing - a point to which I shall return.

A Lady Bountiful attitude which assumes that the ministry of the church is to such «unfortunate individuals» — rather than with them — misses the whole point of the gospel.

The New Testament meets the problem of our guilt at a point which these theories all tend to miss, the personal experience of forgiveness.

During the run - up to the papal visit, we all got pretty well inured (if we weren't already) to the way in which the secular Press will take a Catholic news item, sometimes quite small in itself, and then turn it into a major news story which entirely misses the point.

The theological tradition which tries to separate the suffering of Jesus» humanity from his divinity simply misses the decisive point about the atonement.

You are missing the point, which is our responsibility to fellow man.