Having a fresh pair of eyes look over your resume will give you a chance to pick up on
any missed typos that your brain doesn't see.
More besides, after being written the paper is double checked by an editor for
any missed typos or other errors.
The proofreader will correct
those missed typos, dropped punctuation and clumsy grammar.
Many people can read something a dozen times and still
miss a typo.
If somebody
missed a typo of «mad» rather than «made» that's not going to squick me.
If you DO
miss typos or formatting, you can go in and easily and quickly reload a corrected manuscript.
The more time you spend rewriting things and fidgeting with bullet points, the more likely you are to
miss that typo in your job title.
Reviewing your document over and over can make your eyes glaze over, which in turn makes your chances of
missing a typo increase exponentially!
When you've been staring at your resume for hours, it's easy to
miss typos and errors in grammar.
But sometimes even the most careful people can
miss a typo or two.
It seems obvious but it is easy to
miss typos, particularly if you are continually tweaking your resume and seeing it so many times.
So, if I ramble a bit, or
I miss a typo, please excuse me.
And I didn't proof my comment before sending it so
missed my typo... been on maintenance for about «4» weeks, and haven't made it through even 1 of those weeks faithfully.
Not exact matches
Doing so will likely oust any
typos,
missing words, or other errors you may not have spotted.
God forgives you for
typos, but the many on here that love to focus on the irrelevant details while
missing the giant picture i their face won't.
(Frankly, if I had a Tiny Executive half that cute, I'd be hard pressed to even type a coherent sentence to say nothing of
missing a few
typos!)
Also, I think there's a few words
missing from the first step in your instructions («Place the sheet [in the freezer]...») Lord knows I make
typos all the time but I love it when people help me catch them so I hope you don't find this obnoxious!
That's not a
typo — and no, you won't
miss it.
Typo or did an ingredient get
missed?
Some uncertainty remains whether the mistake was a
typo or a Freudian slip, as the difference between «neighborhood» and «negrohood» is more than a couple
missed keystrokes.
Typo Missing or incorrect metadata Quality: PDF, figure, table, or data quality Download issues Abusive behavior Research misconduct Other issue not listed above
Sorry for the
typos and
miss spelling!
I would hate for you to
miss out because there was a
typo in your contact info.
(PS you are
missing cilantro from the ingredients for the dressing - I'm guessing that's a
typo?)
We all
miss commas and make a
typo here and there, but if a dating profile or message is made up of 90 % mistakes, that's cause for an eyebrow raise.
A
missed comma or the occasional misspelled word could be a
typo, but full sentences and paragraphs in broken English are not.
Director Miguel Arteta, aiming for the easy laughs, overloads the film with them,
missing more substantial opportunities, although he does get a few in like a high as a kite on cough syrup Emily coming out to perform on opening night or a cameo from Dick Van Dyke where he persists in doing a reading to a group of children, disastrous
typo and all.
Please excuse any
typos I may have
missed, and feel free to email me a note letting me know which ones you've noticed.
Disappointments: only one key and fob, rear floormats
missing, lighter not working (to plug in my cell phone for the two hour drive home), aftermarket rain shields over the windows not removed like I asked when the car was cleaned up, final bill of sale as initially presented didn't match handwritten one (multiple
typos - they weren't trying to pack the deal at the last minute, which I have experienced in the past elsewhere).
A proofreader might find a
missing word or quotation mark or the occasional
typo.
I will read through your entire manuscript once to find
typos, grammatical errors,
missed words, etc..
«I read Stephen King's The Dead Zone last night and it was riddled with
typos and
missing letters.
Today's Big 5 book is significantly more likely to have embarrassing
typos, duplicated and / or
missing signatures, and botched editing than one published in 2006.
She always seems to catch more
typos,
missing words, etc..
I'm getting Slices ready to put up on the Kindle store — fixing the
typos I'd
missed, re-writing the introduction, putting together a new cover because I'm not happy enough with the old one — and something I've been thinking...
Reading your work out loud has long been touted as a way to catch
typos,
missing or extra words, or simply notice the passages that may drag on a bit too long.
I actually run my books through an editor for structure and sentence by sentence input, the a proofreader to catch nits,
missing words,
typos, etc..
Who knew that 3 beta readers, AutoCrit, and an editor
missing a single
typo could render 350 + pages is completely irrelevant.
As an author, I know how easy it is to
miss plot holes or character inconsistencies or those pesky
typos and punctuation errors when you've worked closely with a manuscript for months, reading it over and over so many times you can't even see it anymore.
Transcriptions from other sources are often filled with
typos or suffer from issues like inconsistent spelling,
missing accent marks, or
missing punctuation.
If any corrections are needed to your book, such as a
typo you
missed in editing, you will be asked to use our Correction Request Form.
There's often the odd
typo,
missing reference and sometimes links that don't work which all need to be addressed.
The work file had a fairly long list of
typos, and a couple of date issues that had been
missed.
The honest truth is that I'm still tripping up along the way, having to resubmit my book covers more than once to meet Create Space requirements, discovering
typos and
missed words in my novels after they're published, am not marketing my books half as well as I market my media company clients, and continually feel that time is my enemy.
But as a Reviewer, I still run into books riddled with
typos,
missing words, incomplete sentences, blank pages and horrid grammar.
Even editors I've paid for have
missed the occasional
typo.
The analyst must be objective, because when authors read their own work their minds will add
missing words or letters, creating not only
typos but sometimes gaps in the story itself.
After writing, re-writing and editing your book over and over again, you will inevitably
miss some obvious shortcomings and
typos.
The proofreader corrects spelling, punctuation and grammar, such as misplaced apostrophes,
missing full stops, incorrect subject - verb agreements and
typos.