Sentences with phrase «missing the point here»

Oakspar, I believe you're really missing the point here.

-- I think you are missing the point here, Bob.

I must say that the Church has missed the point here.

Maybe I'm missing the point here.

You both are missing the point here.

fat radical said, on February 5th, 2010 at 8:03 am So NP, is it ok in your book to be an openly practicing homosexual & a full paid up member of your local church, just so I am not missing the point here?

So NP, is it ok in your book to be an openly practicing homosexual & a full paid up member of your local church, just so I am not missing the point here?

@truthfully I think you missed the point here, friend.

I think people are missing the point here.

And people might be missing a point here, that Xhaka is our Cazorla replacement.

See, You are missing a point here.

Perhaps I am reading a different article because many commenters seem to be missing the point here.

Another missing point here, is that most of the shady and dishonest coops are not collecting and paying their TAXES either.

Poll respondents presumably know little about how much committee and floor time a marriage vote would consume, but I think Paulsen is missing the point here.

But I think the missing point here is that a lot of people think that a ketogenic diet is a high protein diet.

Am I missing the point here?

I realised that I focused too much on ketones and was completely missing the point here.

OK, sure, but we are missing the point here.

The galaxy tab will be a sucess because it's coming out around the holiday season, I've read alot of remarks that froyo is not truly intended for tablets which is true but many people are missing the point here; this is a hybrid tablet more or less & its being produced exactly as such... that is the reason all four carriers jumped aboard... convience, convience, convience is the selling point & u hav to applaud samsung for trying, be honest a dell streak (5 inches / phone capabilities) or a samsung tab (7 inches / phone capabilities)... Get the point???

Maybe I'm just missing the point here.

I'm enthusiastic about these accounts and think the nay - sayers are missing the point here.

To those that comment that the dogs may not originate from America you are clearly missing the point here.

I fear you have missed the point here.

But I can't help but feel that I'm missing the point here: nDreams delivered perfectly in terms of public relations, but I wasn't there to be fed.

Hmm... I think people are missing the point here, 7 is a pretty respectable score..

I think you are rather missing the point here.

Energy and Capital editor Megan Dailey explains why she thinks he's missing the point here...

Tomcat October 19, 2012 at 3:37 am said:» You have completely missed the point here Stefan, which is that Myrrh is trying to tell us that Nasa et al don't realize we get warmth from the sun»

Tomcat October 19, 2012 at 3:37 am You have completely missed the point here Stefan, which is that Myrrh is trying to tell us that Nasa et al don't realize we get warmth from the sun.

You have completely missed the point here Stefan, which is that Myrrh is trying to tell us that Nasa et al don't realize we get warmth from the sun.

Maybe I'm missing the point here, but how can you call something «an experiment» if it will never discover anything new?

I think you may have missed the point here, Tiger.

Is everyone missing the point here??..

Not exact matches

Because here's the thing: even with the «head of the wife» bit (what I'm sure we can agree is the most solid verse to back you up) you are missing the point and mistaking the analogy, meant to illustrate only, as the thing itself.

I think most people here are missing the point.

I didn't have to read this to see that you're missing the point... we believe in a Creator... because we're here.

If I am missing something here, or misinterpreting your point / s or message... «my apologies.»

@ Doris: you are reading this entire discussion through last week's debate and therefore missing the point of the altogether DIFFERENT discussion happening here.

«see here is where you miss the point evangelicals believe in original sin else why would we say that you are born a sinner»

only reason y i say this is because of Santification, once we give our life to the Lord, we streight way (so to speak) begin the process of Santification, this is Christ making us like him, and this Is SUFFERING It does nt happen over night, but for the duration of our time here, as you have said, its sort of like sin being done unto us, and we are handleing it just like Christ did, (with Love) of coarse with the help of the Holy Spirit, This Does NOT feel Good At ALL since our soulful flesh is Corrupt, (but our spirit is saved) This is were your trails and tribulation, your own desire, and All play apart, Now Moment by Moment we choose by our own will, And Jesus helps in these times, as he was tempeted, but without sin, The devil can do nothing but try and decieve the Christian into thinking that he has to work for his salvation as you have said, this thing here is about your Inheritance In Christ, Its gonna be some show nought broke christian in Heaven, because their trying to set of for themseleve trasure on earth, and their is going to be weeping and gnat of teeth, but it wont be, because of their going to Hell, It will be cause they miss out on what they could have had, and it is Devistation, cause they waste so much time, and they wont be able to attend the wedding, supper of the lamb, they wont be, getting the position over city, galacy, ectt... just check it out some of the points i have made, God Bless you!

Just as Peter missed the point of the first prediction of suffering and death, so James and John here completely misunderstand the nature of the of an earthly nature of the kingdom Jesus has been talking about.

Here is the huge point you are missing... I do not even own a SUV nor do I have xxxchurch.com on any of my vehicles... You are slandering me and do not even know me or what I do or know.

The leaders of Judaism had dozens if not hundreds of definitions about what was» work «on the Sabbath Day and completely missed the point (Jesus said so) and here we are arguing about the definition of «drawing ``.

Here is my point that you missed.

Miss Arendt has been criticized for use of the term «banality» here on the ground that it minimizes the monstrous character of the crimes, but the critics seem to me to miss the point.

As to your last comment about ``... nothing outsides themselves...», here's where I think you miss the point.

The idea that God is here to heal our economic wounds misses the point.

I think some of the commenters are missing a key point here... it is entirely possible, appropriate and correct to simultaneously accept the reality of God's existence AND understand that the Bible has nothing whatsoever to do with it.

You are missing the point of some of the anger here..

Laughing — yet again you fail, you sit here and you tell me in one breath that i'm wrong in dealing with absolutes, Yet My whole point in the previous post was to point out that I can't blame science for killing Billions of people because they created the bombs and guns to do so... Just like you can't blame Christianity for people using violence against others, it's the people not the ideology that caused the violence, and i believe that... for whatever reason you apparently missed that and tried to make me sound like i honestly blame science for killing billions... so... maybe you need some reading and comprehension classes... i du n no, just would appreciate if you're going to argue with me, that you actually read my responses.