Kent County Council leader Paul Carter said social
mobility at the grammars was «not where we would like it to be».
Not exact matches
The paper illuminates his backing for new
grammar schools (May has
at least one former minister on side with this policy it seems) coupled with concentrating on non-graduate routes into professions, encouraging kids to start - up businesses, among other ideas to improve social
mobility.
However, responses were mixed when it came to
grammar's effect on social
mobility: 35 per cent held the view that
grammars improve social
mobility, while 19 per cent thought they damaged social
mobility and a further 27 per cent believed they made no difference
at all (20 per cent of respondents said they didn't know).
While 23 per cent of people polled believed that
grammar schools should be forced to accept children of all abilities, 35 per cent said they believed that
grammars improve social
mobility, with only 19 per cent thinking they damage social
mobility and a further 27 per cent saying they make no difference
at all.
They say 95 per cent of pupils in Surrey are already
at good or outstanding schools, and that there is no evidence that
grammar schools have any positive impact on social
mobility.
The same analysis for secondary schools shows
grammar schools, academically selective
at age 11, are by far the most biased towards more affluent pupils -LRB--98.8 percentage points)-- suggesting they aren't quite the «engines of social
mobility» some
grammar school advocates say they are.
«Having made social
mobility the centre of his conference speech, David Cameron should look
at the clear evidence on
grammar schools: they do not increase equality of opportunity, they make it worse,» said Powell.
At the beginning of the year,
grammar schools were still firmly on the government's agenda, despite two EPI reports and countless other experts explaining how bad it would be for social
mobility, and there was no planned increase to the schools budget, despite fears of a funding crisis.