Regional climate
model bias correction improved the estimates on changes to future mean runoff
Regional climate
model bias correction improved the estimates on changes to future mean runoff
Not exact matches
When it comes to
model performance, there is a concept known as «
bias correction» that was debated.
In this case, there has been an identification of a host of small issues (and, in truth, there are always small issues in any complex field) that have involved the fidelity of the observations (the spatial coverage, the
corrections for known
biases), the fidelity of the
models (issues with the forcings, examinations of the variability in ocean vertical transports etc.), and the coherence of the
model - data comparisons.
Progress in the longer term depends on identifying and correcting
model biases, accumulating as complete a set of historic observations as possible, and developing improved methods of detection and
correction of observational
biases.»
``... since uncertainty is a structural component of climate and hydrological systems, Anagnostopoulos et al. (2010) found that large uncertainties and poor skill were shown by GCM predictions without
bias correction... it can not be addressed through increased
model complexity....
The raw daily climate
model simulation results were
bias corrected according to the ISI - MIP protocol (1, 23), despite known caveats with respect to the use of
bias correction in climate impact studies (24).
This includes raw climate
model output, as well as
model output that has been processed by «
bias correction» (removal of some known errors) and / or «downscaling» (addition of finer spatial detail).
Quantile mapping
bias correction algorithms are commonly used to correct systematic distributional
biases in precipitation outputs from climate
models.
Outputs from seven downscaling methods —
bias correction constructed analogues (BCCA), double BCCA (DBCCA), BCCA with quantile mapping reordering (BCCAQ),
bias correction spatial disaggregation (BCSD), BCSD using minimum / maximum temperature (BCSDX), the climate imprint delta method (CI), and
bias corrected CI (BCCI)-- are used to drive the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC)
model over the snow - dominated Peace River basin, British Columbia.
Because poor simulation of meteorological variables is common in climate
models, a determination that meteorological variability is more important for certain variables than leaf variability may point to meteorological
bias correction as a more fruitful development path — for certain
model applications — than the development of a dynamic phenological routine.
This Perspective considers the issues of
bias correction and makes recommendations for research to overcome
model biases.
15, including the latest orbits, tide
models, sea - state
bias models, water vapor
corrections, etc..
To calibrate the climate
model (remove
bias) by comparing the observed baseline period with the historical climate
model simulations, and then apply this same
bias correction to 21st century simulations;