The National Alliance for Public Charter Schools (NAPCS) recently released an update to
its model charter school law.
Last week the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools published a new, substantially revised version of
its Model Charter Schools Law («A Model Law for Supporting High - Quality Charter Public Schools: Second Edition»).
Not exact matches
Often, these
schools are taking advantage of the innovations offered by blended learning technology platforms and combining them with the regulatory freedom offered under
charter school laws, waivers of seat time requirements, and teacher reforms to develop entirely new
models of education.
This year's class makes my point — a great cross-section of students, some with teaching experience, some with a business background, one in the Harvard
Law School, and several from overseas — but all wanting to see how they could put to work the freedom and flexibility afforded by the
charter model.
We need to support
laws and policies that allow proven education
models, in both
charters and traditional
schools, to flourish in our education landscape.
The National Alliance developed a
model state
law to help states create
laws that support the growth of high - quality
charter schools and each year we rank states based on how well their
charter school laws align to this
model.
Each year we rank states based on how well their
charter school laws align to this
model.
The National Alliance's
charter school model law is a template for states to write
laws that encourage the creation and growth of high - quality
charter schools while holding underperforming
schools and authorizers accountable.
The
model law recognizes that in many states, including New York, a lack of information about the funding gap between
charter schools and their host district is a significant hurdle to even considering the issue.
While New York typically ranks quite high (in 2015, New York placed 7th of 43 states with
charter school laws), the new
model law is a reminder that there is continued room for improvement, particularly in funding equity.
In addition to publishing the
model law to promote strong
charter school laws, NAPCS also uses the
model law as a rubric for grading existing
laws.
Therefore, the
model law recommends requiring the state education department to annually report a comparison of per - pupil revenues for each
charter, compared to the per - pupil revenues for each district from which the
school draws enrollment.
One of the
models allowed for use under Connecticut's Parent Trigger
law would lead to Walsh becoming a
charter school managed either by a
charter operator, a university, or Walsh's own teachers.
Potential policies outlined in the
model law include giving
charter schools a right of first refusal to lease or buy unused
school facilities, giving them access to statewide building aid or financing programs, and including
charters in bonding and tax levy requests.
While reformers failed to overhaul New York City's
laws for hiring and firing teachers, they have succeeded in cultivating a robust system of
charters to challenge the preeminence and performance of traditional public
schools, and offer a
model of what non-union
schools might look like.
This illustrates that when parents take action using the the parent trigger
law, especially with respect to transforming to a
charter model, the
schools preform better and students thrive.
Together, the forthcoming NCSECS guide and the revised
model law should serve as essential resources and practical templates for states that want to do more to ensure that
charter schools are equitable and able to effectively serve all students.
Based on
model legislation developed out of best practices from around the country, this
law creates a rigorous and accountable process to ensure that only the highest quality
charter schools will be authorized.
Parents representing about 69 percent of students at 24th Street Elementary, which has about 685 students in kindergarten through fifth grade, signed a petition seeking the
law's «restart
model,» which lets parents bring in a new
charter operator or pair a
charter operator with the district to turn around a failing
school.
Last year's winner was the National Alliance for Public
Charter Schools for «How State
Charter Laws Rank Against The New
Model Public
Charter School Law».
The only thing standing in their way was a state
law requiring that parents, teachers and the local community had to play a role in selecting a «turnaround»
model and there was little interest in a Washington D.C.
charter school company that had virtually no experience running
schools with a large Latino population, a significant number of English Language Learners and a large special education population.
Rubin / Weber know that
charter school tuition, in almost every case, is less than the cost per pupil in traditional
schools (could be less in every case but I'm trying to
model fact - checking) even though N.J.'s creaky
charter school law prohibits facilities aid.
In a passage starting on p. 160, Ravitch presents the involvement of New York hedge - fund managers in
charter schools at the beginning of a messy discussion of colocation of
charter schools in New York City, the ties between
charter schools and tax credits, similar ties with investment - based visas, real - estate operations with
charter -
school education as a loss leader, and the ideology of profit - motivated
charter -
school model laws pushed by the American Legislative Exchange Council.
In fact, the (Walton - funded) National Alliance for Public
Charter Schools declares that having no limit or caps on the number of charter schools in a state is the No. 1 «essential component» of a model chart
Charter Schools declares that having no limit or caps on the number of charter schools in a state is the No. 1 «essential component» of a model chart
Schools declares that having no limit or caps on the number of
charter schools in a state is the No. 1 «essential component» of a model chart
charter schools in a state is the No. 1 «essential component» of a model chart
schools in a state is the No. 1 «essential component» of a
model chartercharter law.
The
law being drafted by the Maine association is based largely on the National Alliance's
model law, which contains elements from
charter school laws across the country.
[4], [5] Massachusetts state
law codifies this purpose in G.L. c. 71, § 89, which, in part, states that
charter schools are to be established «to stimulate the development of innovative programs within public education» and «to provide
models for replication in other public
schools.»