Sentences with phrase «model figure above»

Not exact matches

These values provide the data needed to generate a chart like the one in Figure 1 above and like the valuation matrix as presented on the Company Model Decision Page.

They didn't see hurricanes until the rain clouds were right above them; in our case, we can see storms leaving the sun but have to make guesses and use models to figure out if and when they will impact Earth,» says Michael Kaiser, project scientist for STEREO at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center.

It doesn't share its figures on them (though starting with model year 2011 vehicles, the EPA began including SUVs and vans — but not trucks — above the 8,500 pound limit in its passenger vehicle category).

During our time with both models, we didn't get much above 30mpg on the trip computer, which isn't far off the claimed figures, but around 15mpg down on the diesels.

The above WLTC fuel economy figures are for models without i - ELOOP.

The main gallery showcases paintings by the designer and street artist duo Graphic Airlines, populated with their signature ghostly, bloated - faced figures, alongside Mok Yat San's and Kevin Fun's fanciful sculptures and Lam Tung Pang's mixed - media landscapes, in which plastic models of floating islands hover above the Hong Kong cityscape.

Show in the above figure (Figure 2d from the article) is the D'Arrigo et al tree - ring based NH reconstruction (blue) along with the climate model (NCAR CSM 1.4) simulated NH mean temperatures (red) and the «simulated tree - ring» NH temperature series based on driving the biological growth model with the climate model simulated temperatures (gfigure (Figure 2d from the article) is the D'Arrigo et al tree - ring based NH reconstruction (blue) along with the climate model (NCAR CSM 1.4) simulated NH mean temperatures (red) and the «simulated tree - ring» NH temperature series based on driving the biological growth model with the climate model simulated temperatures (gFigure 2d from the article) is the D'Arrigo et al tree - ring based NH reconstruction (blue) along with the climate model (NCAR CSM 1.4) simulated NH mean temperatures (red) and the «simulated tree - ring» NH temperature series based on driving the biological growth model with the climate model simulated temperatures (green).

The climate model simulation shown in the figure in the main article above is a coupled OAGCM which does exhibit El Nino - type variability, etc..

This underestimation carries over from the TAR models (see Rahmstorf et al. 2007 and the Figure below)-- this is not surprising, since the new models give essentially the same results as the old models, as discussed above.

The animated figure above shows global temperature anomalies for every month since 1880, a result of the Modern - Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications, version 2 (MERRA - 2) model run by NASA's Global Modeling and Assimilation Office.

The figure above from Cowtan et al. shows how accounting for the apples to oranges problem reduces the divergence between climate models and instrumental data in temperature.

Figure 1: Global temperatures from models are calculated using air temperatures above the land surface and also from the upper few meters of the ocean.

Using the fractions above that results in a CMIP5 ensemble mean of about -1 W / m2, which equals the figure from models with ACI but no lifetime effect.

This is consistent with both the June and July (Figure 3) ensemble predictions from a coupled ice - ocean model submitted by Zhang, which show considerably more ice in the East Siberian Sea compared to 2009, and it is consistent with the June statistical forecasts submitted by Tivy, which also predict a greater ice area than in 2009 and above - normal ice concentrations along the coasts.

Figure 1, above: Surface concentration of black carbon for average of AeroCom models (left) and observations (right).

Figure 2, above: Aircraft BC concentration profiles from the surface (high pressures) to the upper atmosphere (low pressures) from measurements (black) and individual AeroCom models (colored) for the North American south (left panel) and Arctic (right panel).

area in Figure SPM.7 (a) above, which comes from some 30 CMIP5 models all delivering somewhat different results.

In the figure above, you'll notice that the CCC model that Boer is focusing on has the weakest response of precipitation compared to the other models.

Figure 13 - C Model Forecasts and redistribution of heat in the depths of the ocean (in green are Levitus world - average observations above 700 m) in °C / decade Source: http://www.drroyspencer.com/2011/08/deep-ocean-temperature-change-spaghetti-15-climate-models-versus-observations/

The figure above shows all 105 model runs, and reveals significant differentiation among the models.

This is illustrated in the figure above for two periods in a single model run.

The figure above compares the average track forecast errors in the Atlantic Ocean basin during the past six hurricane seasons for the most reliable computer models available to the National Hurricane Center during this period.

Indeed, this dynamics suggests a major multiple harmonic influence component on the climate with a likely astronomical origin (sun + moon + planets) although not yet fully understood in its physical mechanisms, that, as shown in the above figures, can apparently explain also the post 2000 climate quite satisfactorily (even by using my model calibrated from 1850 to 1950, that is more than 50 years before the observed temperature hiatus period since 2000!).

But one should be clear that there is reasonably good evidence for such a connection, both from models and data (see the two figures in our post above).

Such solecisms throughout the IPCC's assessment reports (including the insertion, after the scientists had completed their final draft, of a table in which four decimal points had been right - shifted so as to multiply tenfold the observed contribution of ice - sheets and glaciers to sea - level rise), combined with a heavy reliance upon computer models unskilled even in short - term projection, with initial values of key variables unmeasurable and unknown, with advancement of multiple, untestable, non-Popper-falsifiable theories, with a quantitative assignment of unduly high statistical confidence levels to non-quantitative statements that are ineluctably subject to very large uncertainties, and, above all, with the now - prolonged failure of TS to rise as predicted (Figures 1, 2), raise questions about the reliability and hence policy - relevance of the IPCC's central projections.

crandles: «Looking at figure 2a, the good models below the dotted line has a range that is not much narrower than the range for the bad models above the dotted line.»

I think that we arrive at those figures by relying on computer models that indeed compute theories and evidence but also a lot of questionable and uncertain assumptions that I have mentioned above.

The importance of such thaw - discontinuities can not be underplayed in a model of catastrophic devolatilisation (Shakhova, 2014), as illustrated by Mars where violent degassing equivalent to 20 Yamal explosions per km ² occurs through sub-mound palaeo - taliks alone (e.g., Figure above).

The paragraphs above the figure note that «The rise takes place during a period when, according to the IPCC report, the anthropogenic effect of global warming is evident above the background variations from natural causes» and «We are not aware of any global climate models that predicted the reversal of slope that we observe».

When comparing climate hindcasts to observed land and ocean data (Figure 3), the early 1940's is the only period where observed data lie above model predictions.

It will take some time to get a real feel for the actual battery life figures of both phones, but we're expecting them to take a nice step above last year's models.

The salary is 2K above the figure I initially wrote on my Ideal Career Model (I later increased it by 10K), but that initial figure has been stuck in my mind.

These figures present models probing the significant interaction terms by presenting the figures of the interaction coefficients and 95 % confidence intervals when covariates are centered at a one standard deviation below the mean, the mean, and one standard deviation above the mean.