Steinhaeuser K., and A. A. Tsonis, 2013: A climate
model intercomparison at the dynamics level.
Not exact matches
It's for this reason that it's important to understand the differences in responses between geoengineering experiments, said Ben Kravitz, a climate modeler
at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory who helps run the international Geoengineering
Model Intercomparison Project.
Dr Dudok de Wit's team
at the International Space Science Institute in Bern, and the Coupled
Model Intercomparison Project, have been using the datasets identified through the network to describe the Sun's influence on climate from 1850 up to the present day, as well as a forecast up to the year 2300.
They then looked
at 11 different climate
models that predict precipitation and CAPE through this century and are archived in the most recent Coupled
Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5).
The researchers looked
at a combination of roughly 50 climate
models from around the world that are part of the Coupled
Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5), which is part of the World Climate Research Programme.
Most of the
modelling groups that contributed output to the current MMD
at PCMDI also archived simulations from their earlier
models (circa 2000) as part of the Coupled
Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP1 & 2).
Scientists
at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory within the Atmospheric, Earth, and Energy Division, along with collaborators from the U.K. Met Office and other
modeling centers around the world, organized an international multi-
model intercomparison project, name CAUSES (Clouds Above the United States and Errors
at the Surface), to identify possible causes for the large warm surface air temperature bias seen in many weather forecast and climate
model simulations.
WCRP - JSC / CAS WGNE promotes co-ordinated numerical experimentation for validating
model results, observed atmospheric properties, exploring the natural and forced variability and predictability of the atmosphere, (e.g. the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project, AMIP), as well as studies aimed at refining numerical techniques, and the formulation of atmospheric physics proce
model results, observed atmospheric properties, exploring the natural and forced variability and predictability of the atmosphere, (e.g. the Atmospheric
Model Intercomparison Project, AMIP), as well as studies aimed at refining numerical techniques, and the formulation of atmospheric physics proce
Model Intercomparison Project, AMIP), as well as studies aimed
at refining numerical techniques, and the formulation of atmospheric physics processes.
Since the TAR, EMICs have been evaluated via several coordinated
model intercomparisons which have revealed that,
at large scales, EMIC results compare well with observational data and AOGCM results.
For example, nearly all recent
model intercomparisons show that AOGCMs poorly reproduce precipitation in 30 ° S - 30 ° N, they still diverge for cloud cover evolution
at different levels of the vertical column, and I don't clearly understand for my part how we can speculate on long term trends of tropospheric T without a good understanding of these convection - condensation - precipitation process.
Most of the
modelling groups that contributed output to the current MMD
at PCMDI also archived simulations from their earlier
models (circa 2000) as part of the Coupled
Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP1 & 2).
«In reality climate
models have been tested on multicentennial time scales against paleoclimate data (see the most recent PMIP
intercomparisons) and do reasonably well
at simulating small Holocene climate variations, and even glacial - interglacial transitions.
Using the Coupled
Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) ensemble, Jascha Lehmann from Germany's Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research and colleagues rolled climate forward to 2100 and looked
at the change in storm tracks under a high carbon - dioxide - emissions scenario.
The comparison of different computer simulations of climate change impacts is
at the heart of the ISIMIP project (Inter-Sectoral Impacts
Modelling Intercomparison Project) comprising about 100 modelling groups w
Modelling Intercomparison Project) comprising about 100
modelling groups w
modelling groups worldwide.
They then looked
at 11 different climate
models that predict precipitation and CAPE through this century and are archived in the most recent Coupled
Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5).
WCRP - JSC / CAS WGNE promotes co-ordinated numerical experimentation for validating
model results, observed atmospheric properties, exploring the natural and forced variability and predictability of the atmosphere, (e.g. the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project, AMIP), as well as studies aimed at refining numerical techniques, and the formulation of atmospheric physics proce
model results, observed atmospheric properties, exploring the natural and forced variability and predictability of the atmosphere, (e.g. the Atmospheric
Model Intercomparison Project, AMIP), as well as studies aimed at refining numerical techniques, and the formulation of atmospheric physics proce
Model Intercomparison Project, AMIP), as well as studies aimed
at refining numerical techniques, and the formulation of atmospheric physics processes.
@ David L. Hagen January 9, 2012
at 7:34 am I do not know what can be done to add my
model to the list of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Pro
model to the list of the Coupled
Model Intercomparison Pro
Model Intercomparison Project.
Forest water use and water use efficiency
at elevated CO2: a
model - data
intercomparison at two contrasting temperate forest FACE sites.
The climate projections presented in the IPCC AR4 are from the latest set of coordinated GCM simulations, archived
at the Program for Climate
Model Diagnosis and
Intercomparison (PCMDI).
Pre-TAR AOGCM results held
at the DDC were included in a
model intercomparison across the four SRES emissions scenarios (B1, B2, A2, and A1FI) of seasonal mean temperature and precipitation change for thirty - two world regions (Ruosteenoja et al., 2003).9 The inter-
model range of changes by the end of the 21st century is summarised in Figure 2.6 for the A2 scenario, expressed as rates of change per century.
Unfortunately
at this time, there has been little systematic
intercomparison of such
model configurations.