Sentences with phrase «model intercomparison of»

Varpe, A. Yool, and Y.J. Lee, Ecosystem model intercomparison of under - ice and total primary production in the Arctic Ocean, J. Geophys.

Gregory, J.M., et al., 2005: A model intercomparison of changes in the Atlantic thermohaline circulation in response to increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration.

«Cloud - resolving model intercomparison of an MC3E squall line case: Part I - Convective updrafts.»

Not exact matches

He is a member of a large project getting under way this year, dubbed the Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project, that aims to address that issue by coordinating model conditions to try to tease out the Arctic's imModel Intercomparison Project, that aims to address that issue by coordinating model conditions to try to tease out the Arctic's immodel conditions to try to tease out the Arctic's impact.

The models used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, called Coupled Model Intercomparison Project - 5 (CMIP - 5), are the best physical models of climate change available.

This time, the scientists were able to quickly analyze the summer of 2013 because the model data sets were publicly available through a program called the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phamodel data sets were publicly available through a program called the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project PhaModel Intercomparison Project Phase 5.

Here, we review the likelihood of continued changes in terrestrial climate, including analyses of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project global climate model enseModel Intercomparison Project global climate model ensemodel ensemble.

About a dozen research groups recently launched a new effort called PlioMIP2, or Pliocene Model Intercomparison Project, Phase 2, to model the climate of a time somewhat similar to today in the mid-Pliocene, about 3.205 million yearsModel Intercomparison Project, Phase 2, to model the climate of a time somewhat similar to today in the mid-Pliocene, about 3.205 million yearsmodel the climate of a time somewhat similar to today in the mid-Pliocene, about 3.205 million years ago.

Agrosystems modellers, Dr. Fulu Tao, Dr. Taru Palosuo and Prof. Dr. Reimund Rötter from Natural Resources Institute Finland participated to this collaborative research under the umbrella of AgMIP, The Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project coordinated by Columbia University, NASA and University of Florida, USA.

The researchers looked at a combination of roughly 50 climate models from around the world that are part of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5), which is part of the World Climate Research Programme.

Daily snowfall in a range of climate model simulations has recently been made available through the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project — a growing archive of climate modeling output, including snowfall, that modeling centers and researchers around the world contribute to and anamodel simulations has recently been made available through the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project — a growing archive of climate modeling output, including snowfall, that modeling centers and researchers around the world contribute to and anaModel Intercomparison Project — a growing archive of climate modeling output, including snowfall, that modeling centers and researchers around the world contribute to and analyze.

Using conjoined results of carbon - cycle and physical - climate model intercomparison projects, we find the median time between an emission and maximum warming is 10.1 years.»

We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme's Working Group on Coupled Modeling, the US Department of Energy's Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison, and the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals.

However, the quantitative response to freshwater inputs varies widely among models (Stouffer et al., 2006), which led the CMIP and Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project (PMIP) panels to design and support a set of coordinated experiments to study this issue (http://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/~kd/CMIP.html and http://www.pmip2.cnrs-gif.fr/pmip2/design/experiments/waterhosing.shtml).

Analysis of simple models and intercomparisons of AOGCM responses to idealised forcing scenarios suggest that, for most scenarios over the coming decades, errors in large - scale temperature projections are likely to increase in proportion to the magnitude of the overall response.

Model intercomparison studies (e.g., Gregory et al., 2005; Rahmstorf et al., 2005; Stouffer et al., 2006) were developed to identify and understand the causes for the wide range of MOC responses in the coupled models used here (see Chapters 4, 6 and 10).

Standard experiments, agreed upon by the climate modelling community to facilitate model intercomparison (see Section 8.1.2.2), have produced archives of model output that make it easier to track historical changes in model performance.

Most of the modelling groups that contributed output to the current MMD at PCMDI also archived simulations from their earlier models (circa 2000) as part of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP1 & 2).

Lee, Y.H., J. - F. Lamarque, M. G. Flanner, C. Jiao, D. T. Shindell, T. Berntsen, M. M. Bisiaux, J. Cao, W. J. Collins, M. Curran, R. Edwards, G. Faluvegi, S. Ghan, L. W. Horowitz, J. R. McConnell, G. Myhre, T. Nagashima, V. Naik, S. T. Rumbold, R. B. Skeie, K. Sudo, T. Takemura, F. Thevenon (2013), Evaluation of preindustrial to present - day black carbon and its albedo forcing from ACCMIP (Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project), Atmos.

A number of model intercomparison exercises have taken place, for example ISMIP and MISMIP.

Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project 2 (PMIP - 2) simulations shown in bottom left and right panels do not include the radiative influences of LGM changes in mineral dust or vegetation.

For the work of the Montana Climate Assessment, we employed an ensemble from the fifth iteration of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5), which includes up to 42 GCMs depending on the experiment conducted (CMIP5 undated).

Russell, J.L., R.J. Stouffer, and K.W. Dixon, 2006: Intercomparison of the Southern Ocean circulations in IPCC coupled model control simulations.

Knowledge of dominant scales associated with mesoscale eddies enables a better understanding of the resolution requirements for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, the framework used for comparison of global coupled ocean - atmosphere general circulation models.

The benefits of coordinated model intercomparison include increased communication among modelling groups, more rapid identification and correction of errors, the creation of standardised benchmark calculations and a more complete and systematic record of modelling progress.

Frei, A., J. Miller, and D. Robinson, 2003: Improved simulations of snow extent in the second phase of the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP - 2).

Williams, K.D., et al., 2006: Evaluation of a component of the cloud response to climate change in an intercomparison of climate models.

WCRP - JSC / CAS WGNE promotes co-ordinated numerical experimentation for validating model results, observed atmospheric properties, exploring the natural and forced variability and predictability of the atmosphere, (e.g. the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project, AMIP), as well as studies aimed at refining numerical techniques, and the formulation of atmospheric physics procemodel results, observed atmospheric properties, exploring the natural and forced variability and predictability of the atmosphere, (e.g. the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project, AMIP), as well as studies aimed at refining numerical techniques, and the formulation of atmospheric physics proceModel Intercomparison Project, AMIP), as well as studies aimed at refining numerical techniques, and the formulation of atmospheric physics processes.

In addition, model intercomparison studies do not quantify the range of uncertainty associated with a specific aerosol process, nor does this type of uncertainty analysis provide much information on which aerosol process needs improving the most.

Handbook of Climate Change and Agroecosystems: The Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP) Integrated Crop and Economic Assessments... Change Impacts, Adaptation, and Mitiga

This is not an isolated problem but one of worldwide interest because each country has concerns about their food security.The Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP) was developed to evaluate agricultural models and intercompare their ability to predict climate impacts.

Analysis of simple models and intercomparisons of AOGCM responses to idealised forcing scenarios suggest that, for most scenarios over the coming decades, errors in large - scale temperature projections are likely to increase in proportion to the magnitude of the overall response.

Johnson, M., et al. (2012), Evaluation of Arctic sea ice thickness simulated by Arctic Ocean Model Intercomparison Project models, J. Geophys.

For example, the forcing for the big eruption around 1453 differs by a factor of 2 in the inferred forcing -LRB--12 W / m2 and -5.4 W / m2) in the two estimates proposed for the recent model - intercomparison (Schmidt et al., 2012).

I used to be active in the radiation field, indeed I co chaired the first ICRCCM study (Intercomparison of Radiation Codes for Climate Models).

The basic thrust of the article is that climate modeling groups are making significant efforts to increase the transparency and availability of model tuning processes for the next round of intercomparisons (CMIP6).

In our intercomparison, we found both positives and negatives — the models were kind of all over the place with respect to Fov.

For example, nearly all recent model intercomparisons show that AOGCMs poorly reproduce precipitation in 30 ° S - 30 ° N, they still diverge for cloud cover evolution at different levels of the vertical column, and I don't clearly understand for my part how we can speculate on long term trends of tropospheric T without a good understanding of these convection - condensation - precipitation process.

Earlier model intercomparisons suggest that a freshwater flow in the order of 0.1 Sv (the equivalent of 3,000 cubic kilometers per year) could be critical.

Here, we use the most recent simulations performed in the framework of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 to assess how these stressors may evolve over the course of the 21st century.

The only systematic evaluation of carbon models that were interactively coupled to climate models occurred as part of the Coupled Climate - Carbon Cycle Model Intercomparison Project (C4MIP), where Friedlingstein et al. (2006) compared the ability of a suite of models to simulate historical atmospheric CO2 concentration forced by observed emissions.

The coupled climate carbon cycle intercomparison project (C4MIP) will permit the assessment of model sensitivity of the carbon cycle to global temperature change.

Standard experiments, agreed upon by the climate modelling community to facilitate model intercomparison (see Section 8.1.2.2), have produced archives of model output that make it easier to track historical changes in model performance.

Using the business - as - usual scenario for GHG radiative forcing (RCP8.5) and their novel estimate of Earth's warm - phase climate sensitivity the authors find that the resulting warming during the 21st century overlaps with the upper range of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) climate simulations.

Luderer G, Bosetti V, Jakob M, Leimbach M, Steckel J, Waisman H, Edenhofer O (2012) The Economics of Decarbonizing the Energy System — Results and Insights from the RECIPE Model Intercomparison.

Most of the modelling groups that contributed output to the current MMD at PCMDI also archived simulations from their earlier models (circa 2000) as part of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP1 & 2).

«While in the most recent Climate Model Intercomparison Project 5 some models project a near ice - free Arctic during the summer minimum already toward the beginning of this century, other models keep a substantial amount of ice well into the next century,» Notz and Stroeve write.

So to better examine rates of change, Smith and his colleagues used the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP), which combines simulations from over two - dozen climate models.

This study utilizes both multi-ensembles of a single model: Community Earth System Model (CESM) and multi-models in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 (CMIP5) arcmodel: Community Earth System Model (CESM) and multi-models in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 (CMIP5) arcModel (CESM) and multi-models in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 (CMIP5) arcModel Intercomparison Project phase 5 (CMIP5) archive.

This is a part of the model intercomparison project with UC Davis, UC Santa Cruz, and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.