However,
this model lost points because the reviewers found the connector doesn't last and it's slow to heat up.
Not exact matches
The four critical factors are: (a) businesses with recurring revenue bases — like a renewable subscription — are far better than ones dependent on constantly securing new customers; renewals are much easier and less expensive to secure than new sales; (b) customer retention is absolutely critical — all customers are very costly to acquire and very easy to
lose in a world of almost infinite choices; (c) businesses based on products that require constant replacement or renewal (the «razor blade»
model) are much more attractive than durable goods businesses (like selling refrigerators) where the products have very long repurchase or replacement life cycles and where the market could even fairly quickly reach saturation
points; and (d) businesses that offer products or services that had a predictably high rate of obsolescence were much more attractive than those where the products had long, useful lives.
Skeptics of Facebook's business
model have long
pointed to anecdotal evidence that the social network is
losing its luster with teens as evidence that the firm will ultimately be unable to justify its $ 140 billion valuation.
Once we begin to think of our faith in terms of largeness instead of largess or in terms of measurable success or significant achievements or community stature or statistically significant gains or business
models or congregational
models or appropriate budget processes or cash flow direction or generally accepted accounting practices or independent audits or administrative requirements or managerial transparency or proper leadership roles and boundaries or membership trends or effective organizational structures or a current and accurate vision statement — at that
point, we have become the money changers — we have
lost our faith and deserve to be driven away for we are neither living nor sharing the Good News.
The
model only gives A&M a win expectancy (derived based on in - game stats) of 5 % and thinks we should have
lost by 14 or 15
points.
Our financial situation is much better but the top four business
model is so engrained in the club that we can not fight for the top spot, At critical
points we bottle it and
lose matches we should win, it is not the occasional match which can and does happen to any team but a number of matches.
They could then plug that information into
models to see how much ice Greenland
lost over the 20th century, as well as how that loss varied over time and at different
points around the ice sheet.
The LeBaron
models had a flatter snout, and
lost the slightly
pointed prow like bumper and grill.
At the
point when RWA's behavior crosses over from the mere setting of standards for individual authors» benefit, into trying to force Harlequin to adopt a business
model that pays all its authors a minimum advance of $ 1000, you cross from rule - of - reason antitrust territory (translation: plaintiff
loses) into per - se illegality (translation: plaintiff wins), at which
point all questions about market effect go out the window.
Obviously, the publishers are not happy with the sweeping changes in what has proven to be the largest retail book outlet for consumers in Canada, but supporters of the stores and its new
model are quick to
point out that the bookseller is simply trying to survive in the digital era; of course, the publishers themselves are also trying to survive the ebook revolution, and
losing some of their allies won't help.
When Apple allegedly approached the publishers about switching to an agency
model in order to prevent Amazon from selling ebooks at what was often below cost in order to encourage the sale of Kindle readers, Amazon
lost the option to sell ebooks at its previously advertised $ 9.99 price
point.
Not only is the Agency
Model losing we are also
losing the $ 9.99 price
point.
Amazon, by its own admission, was previously
losing $ 3 to $ 5 per e-book when it sold e-books at the $ 9.99 price
point before the Department of Justice stepped in to force publishers to adhere to a wholesale
model.
According to the premier scoring
model, FICO, when a person with a Credit Score of 680 files for bankruptcy he could
lose anywhere between 130 and 150
points.
This year, people sort of reached a tipping
point with regard to lockboxes and cash shops, which is likely why GW2
lost out to the 2 sub
model games for the Business Model a
model games for the Business
Model a
Model award.
In the Wall Street Journal, Eric Gibson quickly pined for «The
Lost Art of Writing About Art,»
pointing to such
models as Erwin Panofsky, the great historian of the Northern Renaissance.
Thus, even though
models are thought to not
lose ice fast enough, every one of the old CCSM3 runs had a «RILE» (rapid ice loss event) at some
point in the 21st century that beat the current streak.
And, in spite of all its complexity and uncertainties, we should not
lose track of the simple fact that theory, actual observations of the planet, and complex
models - however imperfect each is in isolation - all
point to ongoing, potentially dangerous human alteration of climate.
But it could also
point to a far more transparent
modelling process where GCMs
lose some complexity in return for much more openness, where everyone interested can reproduce results on an affordable machine.
As James Hadley
pointed out here, a DICE
model that assumes we'd only
lose half our global GDP with an 18C temp increase; (4) discount rates are too high.
Somehow this got
lost along the way, but its good to see real world observations (not
models) proving the
point.
Similarly other Zwally detractors
pointed to papers such as Harig 2015 that claimed Antarctica was
losing ice, but Harig 2015 used GIA
models that were well known to over-estimate glacial rebound.
Regarding recent observational evidence, Amman makes the
point that some
model studies show that» the current moderate warming rate is a bit of an aberration, and so a substantial acceleration in the warming rate can be expected to occur in the near future, sufficient not only to match the
modelled warming rate, but even to catch up the recent
lost ground.»
If there was no hindcast, then I could follow the
point that with 2000 forcings low ice
models might
lose their sea ice and become unstable and get rejected for being unstable.
Beyond that
point I get
lost, although Didactylos does end repeating Gavin's
point that «even a naïve
model needs justification».