Sentences with phrase «model mentioned if»
I would start a new question with your specific carburetor make / model mentioned if you require more information on this.
https://mechanics.stackexchange.com/ Not exact matches
Thus, if you're applying for a job in aerospace, absolutely mention that you're into quarter - scale model rocketry.
If someone asked you why you carry a smartphone, you might mention your particular model's sleek design or cop to a bit of an addiction to one silly, time - wasting game or another.
Hey Aaron, not sure if you already mentioned this but based on your wholesaling model if a buyer wanted to inspect the property before committing to it how do you go about getting your buyer into the property?
If the Hebrews mention their ancestors» failures and Moses» model is scientifically accurate then I'll logicall go for the Bible.
I don't suppose anyone's mentioned this before, but if this were the 19th century she would be a perfect model for the Pre-Raphaelites...
They also mention that future studies may want to test other variables in the categories they identified to see if these enhance the model's precision.
T3 Whirl Trio Interchangeable Styling Wand: I don't know if I've mentioned this on my blog before, but I'm a huge fan of Claire Marshall — she's been my role model for several years now.
If you do this in combination with the 80/20 model mentioned above, you help the participants in your courses integrate the new material with previous concepts.
In recent interviews Stephan Winkelmann, CEO and director of Automobili Lamborghini SpA, clearly stated the new Lamborghini model, internally known as LB724, would not be called Cabrera, naturally he never disclosed the name that would be selected... many articles still mention Cabrera to be the designation for the upcoming Lamborghini V10 model... until now: AutoExpress published an article online clearly stating «a source» has confirmed the car to be unveiled at the 2014 Geneva Auto Show will be called Huracán instead... which makes sense if you know that the third name: «Deimos» has in fact been used for the special shade of metallic red seen on the Urus concept... Rosso Deimos.
We recommend the SE model if your budget will allow it, and suggest adding the options mentioned above to optimise it as a day - to - day family workhorse.
While the Super-K convertibles tend to be forgotten in today's world of J - body LeBarons and Chrysler Sebring convertibles, and they had a relatively short life (only 5 model years long), they deserve special mention and remembrance, even if only having the distinction of being the first domestic convertible re-introduced in the 80s.
As mentioned before, we welcome all customers interested in purchasing a Ford model, and if you are looking for a different model from a major manufacturer, you will find some of these in our pre-owned inventory where we offer a vast selection of vehicles.
If you're interested in any of the models mentioned above and their impressive engine specs, be sure to let us know!
That said, the Sonic is the oldest vehicle in its class (tied with the Fiesta if I'm not mistaken)... as you mention, the options packages need to be restructured and the model needs to distinguish itself in the marketplace, something that I believe the pre-facelift model did really well but the post-facelifted model is not doing.
New design line include more rounded headlamps and an extra window just aft of the A-pillar, draw your attention the new exterior mirrors and the mentioned extra window, «copied» from the new Kia cee'd / K3 (click here to view) and this makes us wonder, if this new Kia cee'd / Forte are a global model, with light modifications?.
There's no mention on any of those pages of the MagneRide magnetorheological dampers that Ford says will be available on Performance Pack - equipped Mustang models; as the folks at Mustang6G note, this may mean that the magneto shocks will be offered as a standalone option if the Performance Pack is selected.
If you are interested in test driving any of these impressive Jeep models we've mentioned, schedule your appointment easily online.
I know you mentioned in the past that coaching doesn't fit in with your business model but let me tell you, if you offered Kindle coaching, I'd be the first person to sign - up for it.
Most important, Hugh, as you mention, Hachette «winning» will reinforce the current «traditional» model where once you contract for a publisher to sell your book, you lose control of it forever, no matter how terrible a job they do, or if they just stop selling it (as they do most books).
Finally, don't perform this method if you own a different or similar device with the Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 model number N8000 because the CM10 based ParanoidAndroid custom ROM will work only for the mentioned tablet.
Apply this tutorial only if you own the unlocked international version of the Galaxy Note 10.1, which has model number GT - N8010; the official Android 4.1.1 Jelly Bean software will work only on the mentioned device.
I don't get it: every time you mention Sony e-readers, you point out that their infrared touch system is the same as the Kobo and Kindle touch models, as if Sony was copying them.
Apply the Android 4.2.2 Jelly Bean based SynergyROM by using this step by step guide only if you own the Samsung Galaxy S4 model number I9505; the tutorial is working only for the mentioned device so be careful and try not to mess things up.
Since the tablet models mentioned above were benchmarked with the 1.8 GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 processor with 4G LTE modem and Qualcomm Adreno 510 graphics processor, the question was what the model name would be, and if Samsung would still market these tablets as Samsung Galaxy Tab S2, Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 Plus, or even Samsung Galaxy Tab S3.
Furthermore, apply the next steps only if you own the Samsung Galaxy S4 model number I9505 because the tutorial is compatible only with the mentioned phone; else you will risk in bricking your Android powered device.
It makes sense to me that for the first print run publishers stick largely with the current model but use POD on the backlist; that could have tremendous benefits to author and pub house both if done correctly (not to mention readers, who'd be able to order older books by a favourite writer and not face the flipping frustrating «out of print» or «no stock available» options.
So, that's why you should apply this step by step guide only if you have the mentioned smartphone and not a similar model of the same.
Apply the next steps only if you want to flash the Android 4.2 Jelly Bean Rasbeanjelly custom ROM on the Samsung Galaxy Nexus model number I9250 as the software will work only on the mentioned device.
Do not apply this guide if you own a similar smartphone with the Samsung Galaxy Nexus model number GT - I9250 because the KALO Android 4.2.1 ROM will work only on the mentioned phone.
In fact, as we mentioned earlier, if you're heading into retirement and are short of money, you should move your investing in the opposite direction: well - established companies that have proven business models.
If a car commercial comes on during America's Next Top Model and mentions a monthly payment for a vehicle, it's likely the payment required to lease a car, not an auto loan payment.
This model is perhaps one the most conventional looking litter boxes on offer of the models mentioned here — even if it does claim to be «unique looking».
And as I mentioned before, if your dog can't consume raw meaty bones because of age or dental problems then he's not going to thrive on the Prey Model.
Battery life has gotten better in newer models, but there's still room for improvement, not to mention that it would be great if that energy could be coming from a renewable source.
# 457 DavidU: But if you look at the paper Gavin mention at the end of # 440 you can see how close to the current actual climate the models in the late 80's got.
But if you look at the paper Gavin mention at the end of # 440 you can see how close to the current actual climate the models in the late 80's got.
When you and Ike began discussing the the Energy Imbalance and you mentioned the «missing heat», it brought back the question of what if there is an interruption to normal water vapor latent heat transfer and it is not corrected in the models?
Note also — as I alluded to in an earlier coment above — that with all of the emphasis on the post-volcanic cooling, many observers are missing an equally important conclusion that we draw in the paper (and mentioned in the press release): that if the models we compared to have things about right, then RCS is doing a remarkably good job of reconstructing the long - term variability.
Skeptical101 # 14 My interpretation and synopsis of the considerable technical detail and references provided by Tom Curtis # 15 & One Planet # 16, # 17 is that your»... not use it as an argument to support AGW» is correct if used over periods in which short term natural variability influences the trend strongly (< 30 years was mentioned sometimes) and, in particular, the models are not able to predict the ENSO conditions at all well.
So it seems to me that the simple way of communicating a complex problem has led to several fallacies becoming fixed in the discussions of the real problem; (1) the Earth is a black body, (2) with no materials either surrounding the systems or in the systems, (3) in radiative energy transport equilibrium, (4) response is chaotic solely based on extremely rough appeal to temporal - based chaotic response, (5) but at the same time exhibits trends, (6) but at the same time averages of chaotic response are not chaotic, (7) the mathematical model is a boundary value problem yet it is solved in the time domain, (8) absolutely all that matters is the incoming radiative energy at the TOA and the outgoing radiative energy at the Earth's surface, (9) all the physical phenomena and processes that are occurring between the TOA and the surface along with all the materials within the subsystems can be ignored, (10) including all other activities of human kind save for our contributions of CO2 to the atmosphere, (11) neglecting to mention that if these were true there would be no problem yet we continue to expend time and money working on the problem.
VP, I failed to mention, if they had a model run with a large amount of negative internal variability and they were adjusting to a time period that hapened to have a lot of positive internal variability, they could really mess things up royally.
I have not gone through the list to see if Steel is correct, but none of the articles mentioned deal with recent climate change or climate models.
A point I've not seen mentioned anywhere yet is that if Anthony Watts» paper is accepted then it blows a massive hole in the regional modelling of the US and hence the global modelling of climate, because the models have to hindcast as well as forcast.
Not to mention, the EPA can always revise their findings in the future if the modeling can be improved.
I have some experience in the area of control engineering and system modelling, so I am a bit confused, if you say that it is a weak forcing, albeit you mention that it should have a big effect due to larger scale and (compared to glacial times) instanteous impact.
If systematic errors in their model global climate can be shown, that would indicate a problem, but none have been specifically mentioned by David Young or others, so it makes it hard to answer except in general terms, like validation with plenty of global data has been done on GCMs.
Some of the things I mention may be based to some extent on model projections, if you want to disregard them on that basis it's up to you but the rest of us are under no obligation to.
They don't mention if the models could be wrong but they give a 25 % change of hiatus continuing for another 5 years.
Even if the Von Storch team had not expected this problem, they must have clearly seen it unfold: the trend in their model during the transition phase reveals that it was far from equilibrium, and they should at the very least have mentioned this problem as a caveat in their papers.