The British parliamentary system, inspired by John Locke, Edmund Burke, John Stuart Mill and many others who believed in a system of checks and balances to guarantee our liberties, has in the past been much admired as
a model of liberal democracy, one that has enabled the peaceful evolution that has been an almost unique part of our history.
But neither are we impressed by the simplistic portrayal of Bush's stance, especially when the US's regulation of embryonic SC research is mirrored in the policies of a host of European nations, including such
models of Liberal democracy as Germany and Denmark.
Not exact matches
Rather than insisting that the current form
of Western - type
liberal democracy is the ultimate form
of governance for all societies, we need to envisage other governance
models that go one step beyond freedom and incorporate and uphold human dignity needs.
-- which invites answers measuring how well non-western countries fare in relation to a presumed
model of western secularism — I start from
liberal democratic ideals and assume that they are not ethnocentric: human rights, freedom, equality and
democracy are universal aspirations.
This allows us to see that it is a mistake to assume that
liberal democracy requires a strict separation
of state and religion on the French or US
model.
In addition, the existence
of marginalized communities in Western democratic societies, which stand as the pinnacle
of the
liberal democracy model, as well as some contested international policies
of some
democracies in recent history, have questioned the mythology
of the
liberal order in its current form as an aspiration
of all peoples and the natural course
of history.
These countries are cited to us as reassuring
models of such funding in
liberal democracies much like ours.
Support for live - blogging courtroom proceedings and discrediting class distinctions drawn in this regard also stems from a promotion
of the
model of discursive
democracy outlined above in Part I. Drawing on the work
of theorists including Lon Fuller, recall that the Supreme Court
of Canada and legal scholars such as Jeremy Waldron held that the fair functioning
of the
liberal democratic order required civilian access to information and the attendant opportunity to deliberate upon that information critically.