Sentences with phrase «model output per»

I don't believe the «general public» is really that interested in model output per se.

Model outputs per se are not empirical scientific data.

Not exact matches

But he said the 15 - year - old Tesla right now is focused on getting Model 3 output to more than 5,000 per week, with a good profit margin per car.

From computer models, he found that counter-rotating vertical turbines could be arranged in such a way that a vertical wind farm has a higher power output per unit of area than a horizontal farm, upward of 10 times the energy density.

The real «reforms,» here, pertained to the extent to which value - added model (VAM) or other growth output were combined with these observational measures, and the extent to which districts adopted state - level observational models as per the centralized educational policies put into place at the same time.

I also argued (but this was unfortunately not highlighted in this particular article), that I could not find anything about the New Mexico model's output (e.g., indicators of reliability or consistency in terms of teachers» rankings over time, indicators of validity as per, for example, whether the state's value - added output correlated, or not, with the other «multiple measures» used in New Mexico's teacher evaluation system), pretty much anywhere given my efforts.

Despite this incredibly high specific output (166bhp per litre) and a 0 - 62mph time of 5.9 seconds, the RCZ R is actually the most efficient model in the petrol RCZ line - up, with impressive claimed figures of 44.8 mpg on the combined cycle and 145g / km of CO2 emissions.

The Sport Series is tasked with more than doubling McLaren's overall road car output to more than 4000 units per year — it's the crux of the McLaren Automotive business model.

The Mk10 model will flaunt reduced CO2 output and increased bhp per litre as new 1.5 - and 1 - litre turbo units replace the current car's (pictured) atmospheric 1.4 - and 1.8 - litre engines.

At 150hp per litre, it has the highest specific output of any model in the line - up.

The 116i, featuring an entirely new 1.6 litre four - cylinder turbocharged petrol engine, boasts the same power output of the previous entry model, the 118i, despite using 24 per cent less fuel (5.7 litres / 100 km) than the comparable outgoing model.

Output is 10 kW or 20 kW higher than with the predecessor models, yet fuel consumption has been reduced by up to 10 per cent.

Even more impressive, these Turbo models generate 201 horsepower on regular fuel, which represents a best - in - class specific output of 125.6 horsepower per liter.

The 2017 Corolla LE Eco model takes fuel sipping to the next level thanks to a 1.8 - liter engine with Valvematic technology and an ECO mode button that eases the gas pedal output and automatically adjusts air conditioning, allowing the Corolla to reach an EPA - estimated 40 miles per gallon on the highway.

Power outputs range from 90 kW / 122 hp to 200 kW / 272 hp; the torque scale starts at 230 and goes up to 350 Nm; fuel consumption ranges between 5.8 and 9.5 litres per 100 kilometres depending on the engine model and output class, and has been reduced by up to 10.8 percent compared with the outgoing Sports Coupé.

The top model in the new E-Class diesel range is the six - cylinder E 350 CDI with an output of 170 kW / 231 hp, which uses 0.5 litres per 100 kilometres less fuel than the previous E 320 CDI.

In the case of the petrol models too, «more power and more driving pleasure with even lower fuel consumption» proves to be the perfect formula: the E 200 CGI BlueEFFICIENCYmodel with direct petrol injection has a displacement of 1.8 litres and an output of 135 kW / 184 hp yet consumes a mere 6.8 litres of premium unleaded petrol per 100 kilometres (provisional NEDC combined figure).

However, it is the 15 per cent increase in torque that really distinguishes the Speed model, which now develops an impressive output of 750 Nm (553 lb ft).

Depending on the model and engine output, the four petrol variants of the B ‑ Class return fuel consumption figures of between 6.6 and 8.1 litres per 100 kilometres on the NEDC driving cycle.

The two - liter engine in the new model should exceed a power per liter output of 200 hp.

Despite 8 kW (11 hp) of additional output versus the preceding model, the fuel consumption of the E 63 AMG has been significantly reduced: at 12.6 litres of super-premium grade petrol per 100 kilometres (NEDC combined), the fuel consumption of the E 63 AMG is almost twelve percent lower than before, and leads the field among sports saloons developing more than 377 kW (500 hp).

Combined fuel economy in everyday driving, both models return fuel economy and emissions figures that undercut those for conventionally powered sports cars with similar outputs by around 50 per cent, yielding approximately 70 MPGe (preliminary figures).

The classic and Slim PS4 models offer a maximum output of 1080p, while the Pro is capable of 4K ultra high definition gaming at 30 frames per second, or 1080p at 60 FPS.

Finally, I see that the eyeball line of best fit through the model outputs on the 30 - year graph implies a trend of approximately 1.5 C degrees per century.

However, when comparing model outputs against Hurst climate persistence, I find that the catastrophic majority anthropogenic global warming hypothesis to be formally «Not Proven» per Bray (2005), and Johnson (2013).

And I can't run models, other than simple ones in Excel where I can change input parameters and view the results — preferably in the charts I am most interested in; e.g., your Figure 3 here http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-012-0613-3 and my Figure 1 from DICE - 2013R outputs showing net benefit of mitigation policies per 5 years to 2100 (posted @ December 30, 2016 at 10:52 pm up thread).

This latter value when used in the models gives 1K to 6K per century as output.

The 2,836,037 kWh per acre per year in your model is 16 times higher then the real output from the Springerville array (176,477 kWh per acre per year) which happens to be in about as ideal a location as you will ever find.

Moreover, the whole Tesla production system is now on a firm foundation for that output, which means we should be able to exceed a combined Model S, X, and 3 production rate of 4000 vehicles per week and climbing rapidly.