Sentences with phrase «model physics taking»
The continental - scale behavior of the ice sheets depends upon difficult - to - model physics taking place at a much smaller scale.
http://www.climateprospectus.org/ Not exact matches
The beauty of evolutionary biology is that unlike physics, where you have to take a ton of data to hope that the one model you've got really works, evolution allows you to pull together pieces from hundreds of different areas of search to all support the same theory.
Whitehead makes a point of taking a concept from biology to understand physics instead of interpreting biological organisms from models developed in physics.
I gave a paper explaining how an article (taken from New Scientist) dealing with models of the atomic nucleus could be used to teach English for physics at university level.
RECENT hints of a featherweight Higgs boson don't just take us nearer to a complete standard model of physics.
While this single event can not be used to probe beyond - Standard - Model physics, it demonstrates that the approach works well and can be applied to catch more events in the next run of data - taking, which kicks off in mid-April.
Some events will take place in an aquatics center inspired by the Weaire - Phelan structure, a physics model that describes how soap bubbles form.
Quite a number of experiments have disagreed with the standard model of particle physics at the 99 per cent confidence level but have fizzled out after more data was taken.
«Physics may bring faster solutions for tough computational problems: A physics - inspired model takes on computational challenges from a new perspective.Physics may bring faster solutions for tough computational problems: A physics - inspired model takes on computational challenges from a new perspective.physics - inspired model takes on computational challenges from a new perspective.»
Active Physics, a course based on the textbook Six Ideas That Shaped Physics by Thomas A. Moore of Pomona College, has its roots in the 1980s when educators, dissatisfied with lecture courses, became interested models of instruction that require students to take more responsibility for their own learning.
Advances in computing power and physics have helped him build sophisticated models, spun from hundreds of thousands of lines of computer code, that capture the nuances of the stars» shape while taking into account everything from stars» rotation and nuclear reactions to Einstein's theory of gravity.
If the standard model of particle physics has correctly predicted its characteristics, gathering enough data to find the Higgs should take about two more years, says Albert de Roeck, deputy spokesman for the Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) experiment at the LHC.
Today the Standard Model of particle physics organizes all the known elementary particles into these patterns (or «representations»), but it takes a combination of three Lie groups to account for how the particles can interact via three fundamental forces (electromagnetism and the strong and weak nuclear forces).
All Tara Shears wanted for 2013 was to see the Standard Model of particle physics take a few hits.
Others think that a new model of physics takes over that is beyond current scientific understanding, but no one knows for sure, without more measurements of high - energy particles from «the Knee» region.
Conservation of the number of leptons — subatomic particles such as electrons, muons, or neutrinos that do not take part in strong interactions — was written into the Standard Model of particle physics.
User - generated content lets you take advantage of the advanced graphics and physics model to design your car exactly as you want.»
PUBG's fully modelled bullet physics mean landing any shots at a distance is a rewarding experience, but the bolt - action Kar98k sniper rifle takes that to another level.
DiRT Rally is the latest installment in the DiRT franchise, and takes the series back to its hardcore sim roots, with realistic damage modelling, hardcore offroad physics, and real - life rally courses from all over the world.
The physics model here is incredibly in depth and if you turn the assists off you have to learn to take into account the weight distribution of your rider which is vital when accelerating, braking and cornering.
Simply getting the physics modelling as close to perfect as possible takes multiple experts working many hours, let alone the effort that needs to go into visuals, sound, artificial intelligence and online components.
«From the start we knew we wanted to take advantage of what the Tegra 3 mobile processor can do, from extra-detailed models and normal - mapped textures to advanced collision and driving physics.
From the gorgeous models and textures, to the detailed driving and collision physics, to high - end special effects like motion blur, lens splash, and dynamic headlights — Beach Buggy Blitz is optimized to take console - quality gaming mobile with Tegra 3 processor - powered super phones and tablets.
Euro Truck Simulator 2 sports attractive visuals and realistic driving model, which takes into account not only well - researched real - life physics, but also the current road conditions.
-- singleplayer league, practice and treasure hunt — high - end autopilot with lifelike computer driving, like real players — impressive real - time physics with realistic movements and reactions — light model with sunshine, artificial light, darkness and real - time shadows Take a introduction in tutorial and gather additional experience in practice with your coach.
It's the code that takes care of the seemingly simple stuff that's universal to most games, like interpreting controller inputs, pulling up the appropriate graphics and sound, and modeling the physics.
It also proves that Howard Hayden, physics professor emeritus at the University of Connecticut, was correct in describing the machinery of the climate model - hysteria industrial complex as one that takes «garbage in» and spits «gospel out.»
The default position being taken as the climate models are true seems to rest on the «it is just physics» as some commenters here are fond of saying (e.g., M. Tobis).
The society has officially taken a position many of us AMS members do not agree with... Instead of organizing meetings with free and open debates on the basic physics and the likelihood of AGW induced climate changes, the leaders of the society... have chosen to fully trust the climate models and deliberately avoid open debate and discussion... My interaction (over the years) with a broad segment of AMS members... have indicated that a majority of them do not agree that humans are the primary cause of global warming.»
PIOMAS has higher resolution and the physics of the cyclone itself is taken care of in the NCEP / NCAR model, which is basically a forecasting model - and forecast models serve us well on a day to day basis forecasting the weather on local scales.
There are experts in the underlying physics, and in how particular models work; but asking them for their prior probabilities in this context is to take them outside of their expertise.
Can't they take an existing model and change the physics?
There's of course all the new solar physics models that have been released in the past few years which indicates the sun, not CO2, is the primary climate factor, and they are predicting global cooling as well (and having a difficult time getting published and taken seriously by the «consensus» holders):
Until the so called models can model the physics of decadal and much longer variability — I will take them with a grain of salt.
They have taken this view because they know that the physics within their models and the long range of their forecast periods will likely not to be able to withstand knowledgeable and impartial review (see Appendix).
I believe the lower bound is being made lower because of physics modeling that says that the ocean surface temperature will take forever to fully respond to the forcing.
The very fact that models with differing and incomplete / uncertain physics sort of vaguely match reality, getting the «right» (to some degree) answer for the wrong reasons, should cause people to wonder how they are tweaked to do so and question why their future projections should be taken seriously since the «wrong reasons» are more likely to lead to the «wrong answers» in the future than to accidentally sort of be «right» in a future they can't tweak it now to match.
So all it takes is some surface reconstructions and some flux data from a crude GCM to provide a test for a continental scale model of ice sheets that incorporate basic physics and include the Schoof mechanism.
So, should we take the mean of the ensemble of «physics based» models for the quantum electronic structure of atomic carbon and treat it as the best predictionof carbon's quantum structure?
It's pretty funny that the GWPF is predicting no warming based on statistical analyses that can't agree whether warming stopped in 1998 or 2002, and pretty funny that the two modeling techniques used deliver quite different forecasts, making not one, not two, but four different forecasts — all of which we are apparently supposed to take more seriously than anything that is based on, you know, physics.
A purely statistical analysis that doesn't take into account physics can at best predict short term phenomena or situations that are exact analogues to past variations with similar causality to situation they purport to be modelling.