Sentences with phrase «model verification data»

A description of both the DESRAD concept and the Diurnal Test Facility is presented here along with examples of the model verification data and a brief measurement uncertainty analysis.

Not exact matches

As to validated, I was speaking in terms of model validation — verification of trends in the model against data, etc..

He is expert in application of the mesoscale modelling output (numerical wind atlas data) in microscale models (including WAsP) for site specific verification and feasibility studies.

But since my experience (always risky when thinking about statistics which so often has provable results that seem counter to intuition) tells me that one should be really excited to have a model that shows more skill in verification than over the data against which it was calibrated, I have to wonder why discard those cases at all?

As I said on another blog, what would be an interesting comparison would be a comparison of data to output from (e.g.) unmodified AR4 codes run further forward to 2013 (or as recent as is practicable) using the actual forcings, starting with the exact run states of the models at the end of the verification period for AR4 (that is the end - point where «known» forcings were used, rather than scenarios).

All of the models are verified against observational data, but in a model with 10 ** 9 degrees of freedom, it is not always clear how to interpret these verifications, and what elements of the solution are actually important in terms of the objectives of the simulation.

The recommendations for validation made by Sargent (the author) are: 1) assessing the conceptual validity of the model 2) computer model verification 3) necessary data is available for building the model

Recommendations for verification are: 1) comparison to other models 2) degenerate tests 3) event validity 4) extreme event validity 5) extreme condition tests 6) «face» validity tests 7) fixed value tests 8) historical data validation 9) internal validity (stochastic runs) 10) multistage validation 11) parameter variability - sensitivity analysis 12) predictive validation 13) traces 14) turing tests (i didn't know what this is so googled ECWMF turing test, and i got 150 hits)

It was a striking verification, with entirely independent methods and data, of what computer models had been predicting for the planetâ??