I know this plan is overly simplistic and that there is no single solution, but I am looking for a story to tell that allows us to think the totality in new ways — and because it's
modeled on actual events and in fact almost happened, it could happen again in this way.
Not exact matches
It's possible that the DNA could be wrong, or that the reenactment
models could be off, but in the absence of any
actual eyewitness (and even that testimony is not as reliable as once assumed) testimony to an
event it is the best we have to go
on, right?
Oppenheimer and his co-authors use a technique known as «structured expert judgment» to put an
actual value
on the uncertainty that scientists studying climate change have about a particular
model's prediction of future
events such as sea - level rise.
That's not all though, as Community Manager Mathew Everett, says that this is the
actual in - game
model this is included in the gameplay reveal of the game
on Friday April 17 2015 at the Star Wars Celebration
event.
They say this is data - driven based
on actual events, not
on computer
models.
«The computer
models just charged
on into the far distant future with no correlation to
actual future
events.»
So - called experts in climatology do not base their work
on actual events from the past; rather they base their work
on scenarios from
models!
Rooijmans» figures were based
on computer
modelling rather than
actual events.