The work spread during the 1960s as computer
modelers began to make decent short - range predictions of regional weather.
However a few climate
modelers began arguing CO2, not heat transport, was the ultimate climate control knob.
The modelers begin with certain assumptions about climate that they build into the model.
Not exact matches
Modelers have
begun to experiment with «interactive land biospheres».
During this time, the very short wavelength UV was 10 % lower than it was during time of high solar activity and now even the climate
modelers are
beginning to find that this can lead to negative polar oscillation and cold winters in the temperate lattitudes.
Nearly a decade ago, when I first started looking into climate science, I
began to suspect the
modelers were using what I call a «plug» variable.
I was expecting you to
begin supporting the GCM's as the best we have and the
modelers «salt of the Earth» speech.
Whether they believe the planet is getting hotter, as the
modelers contend, or is not, as the thermometers suggest, they will
begin to see the virtues of such a tax.
Furthermore if you add the knowledge that models have been «recentered» to fit exactly the average value of the 1900 - 1950 period, so that the agreement of the average is granted from the
beginning, the overall quality of the fit is even more questionable — Note that if it is in the IPCC report, it is probably the best that
modelers can produce.
Modelers felt driven to do better, for people had
begun to demand much more than a crude reproduction of the present climate.