Not exact matches
The
model draws on historical
records of soil and air
temperatures, along with the finding that females can shift their nesting dates by about 10 days.
Although climate
models have suggested that spring
temperatures affect stream flow, this study is the first to examine the instrumental historical
record to see if a
temperature effect could be detected, said lead author Connie Woodhouse, a UA professor of geography and development and of dendrochronology.
This
model uses average
temperatures and does not take into account how a
record hot or cold day might affect nest survival.
Mora's
models merge
temperature records with climate forecasts to predict when the
temperature for any given region «departs» from its historic range.
«Non-linear» animal reactions He and his colleagues based their analysis on nearly 500 million
temperature records collected at 3,000 weather stations between 1961 and 2009, feeding that information into
models that allowed them to estimate how climate shifts affected the metabolism of cold - blooded insects, lizards and amphibians around the world.
However, past
temperature records have suggested that warming is largely confined to mid-to-high latitudes, especially the poles, whereas tropical
temperatures appear to be relatively stable: the tropical thermostat
model.
Based on the volcanic
record in and around Iceland over the last 56 million years and numerical
modeling, Brown and Lesher show that high mantle
temperatures are essential for generating the large magma volumes that gave rise to the North Atlantic large igneous provinces bordering Greenland and northern Europe.
This study integrates the complementary information preserved in the global database of borehole
temperatures [Huang et al., 2000], the 20th century meteorological
record [Jones et al., 1999], and an annually resolved multi proxy
model [Mann et al., 1999] for a more complete picture of the Northern Hemisphere
temperature change over the past five centuries.
«Such markers can be seen in remote sensing imagery and tree - ring isotopes, but we're also looking at climate
records for precipitation and
temperature, along with numerical
modeling to determine what type and how much water has been delivered to a basin in the first place.
Bromwich said the disagreement between climate
model predictions and the snowfall and
temperature records doesn't necessarily mean that the
models are wrong.
ABSTRACT: French
records of grape - harvest dates in Burgundy were used to reconstruct spring - summer
temperatures from 1370 to 2003 using a process - based phenology
model developed for the Pinot Noir grape.
[Response: The study quoted uses the difference between the weather
models and the mostly independent surface
temperature record to estimate a residual trend.
He concludes: «The new analysis adds to the growing body of evidence suggesting that these discrepancies are most likely the result of inaccuracies in the observed
temperature record rather than fundamental
model errors.»
Using thus 10 different climate
models and over 10,000 simulations for the weather@home experiments alone, they find that breaking the previous
record for maximum mean October
temperatures in Australia is at least six times more likely due to global warming.
The historic
temperature record is a massively important part of this jigsaw though, because it can tell us if todays warming is within natural variability or quite unprecedented, and it is also used to «tune» computer
models (not that this has any great meaning — another story!).
First, a graph showing the annual mean anomalies from the CMIP3
models plotted against the surface
temperature records from the HadCRUT4, NCDC and GISTEMP products (it really doesn't matter which).
Their
model certainly doesn't explain all of the features of the
temperature record, but since it was never their claim to have done so, such criticisms seem misplaced.
Since some of these
models have been fitted to the
temperature record, and the
temperature record has been shown to be suspect, isn't it a case of garbage in, garbage out?
To contribute to an understanding of the underlying causes of these changes we compile various environmental
records (and
model - based interpretations of some of them) in order to calculate the direct effect of various processes on Earth's radiative budget and, thus, on global annual mean surface
temperature over the last 800,000 years.
One looked at the historical
temperature record and compared how often such severe heat waves occurred a century ago versus today using 3 - day averages; the other used climate
models that simulate a world with and without warming to see how the odds of such an event shifted.
This
model suggests an 80 percent chance of a
record high in 2016, without any global
temperature data for this year being used at all.
John Christy and Roy Spencer of the University of Alabama published a series of papers starting about 1990 that implied the troposphere was warming at a much slower rate than the surface
temperature record and climate
models indicated Spencer and Christy (1992).
The scientists got a very similar result when they repeated their analysis with a different set of
models (those used in the Weather@Home project), strengthening confidence in their conclusion that the
record high
temperatures were highly unlikely in the absence of climate change.
Climate change made it 175 times more likely that the surface waters of the Coral Sea, which off the Queensland coastline is home to Australia's Great Barrier Reef, would reach the
record - breaking
temperatures last month that bleached reefs,
modeling analysis showed.
As Bromwich explains on his website, he blended
model data and observations «to reconstruct a
record of Antarctic near - surface
temperature back to 1960»:
Many
temperature models offer a wide variety of features: memory storage for last
recorded temperatures, fever alerts, and backlist displays, to name a few.
However, the
temperature as an added signal which is either a cooling or warming one based on current «weather» influenced by ENSO inter alia and this additional «weather» signal in the
temperature record is only averaged in the
models if included at all.
Response: < / b > von Storch et al purport to test statistical methods used to reconstruct past climate patterns from «noisy» proxy data by constructing false proxy
records («pseudoproxy»
records) based on adding noise to
model gridbox
temperature series taken from a climate simulation forced with estimated past radiative forcing changes.
global average sfc T anomalies [as] indicative of anomalies in outgoing energy... is not well supported over the historical
temperature record in the
model ensemble or more recent satellite observations
The
models track the
temperature record really really well during this period.
Accurate
models MUST mismatch the
temperature record in the short to medium term unless the «weather» signal remains neutral over the whole period.
Now scientists have concluded this century, that this natural variation «weather» signal can be large enough to put a significant mismatch between
model output and current decadal
temperature record.
Secondly, the eyeball average of the
model outputs does not fall particularly close to the endpoint of the
temperature record.
His error, however, is in suggesting that this discovery (with limited understanding of its magnitude) somehow throws into doubt existing
models of AGW (which are based on much more firmly established physical processes with trends in different climate forcings that are directly testable against the historical
temperature record).
This means that for the first time a large number of
models can be readily tested against
temperature data
recorded AFTER those
models were finalized.
The measures are based on regional data and given a suitable
model we can identify a corresponding signal in the global
temperature record.
Jacob (and many, many others) seem to think that if
model A, when run from 1900 to present, predicts the relatively flat, global average surface
temperature record over the past decade, is a better match to reality than
model B which does not.
Other examples have involved assuming the MSU - TMT
record can be compared to
temperatures at a specific height in the
model, instead of using the full weighting profile.
He concludes: «The new analysis adds to the growing body of evidence suggesting that these discrepancies are most likely the result of inaccuracies in the observed
temperature record rather than fundamental
model errors.»
If it is not obvious to a person why a «mismatch» between a
model and the
temperature record are expected, this is a clue that their understanding is far below what it should be for a well read, science literate person who claims to be interested in this issue.
What really concerns me is that I've read a lot about climate
models not being able to replicate the magnitude of abrupt regional
temperature changes in the past, and Raypierre has said here that he fears that past climate
records point towards some yet unknown positive feedback which might amplify warming at the northern latitudes.
Of course you should have posted the
models hindcasts for the whole of the 20th century and then you would see the excellent short to medium term correlation between
model output ant global
temperature record.
The idea apparently persists that climate
models are somehow built on the surface
temperature records, and that any adjustment to those
records will change the
model projections for the future.
A similar case can be made for volcanoes, we have an index, (the tau values), so given our best
model we can identify a signal in the
temperature record and remove it.
It will not have escaped the notice of keen observers that the satellite /
model discrepancy has been used extensively in certain circles to cast doubt on the
models, surface
temperature record and our understanding of basic physics.
Well, for one thing we see climate
models that are as noisy as the
temperature record, yet as the errors reduce, it looks like the
temperature record gets less noisy.
The disagreement comes only over Berkeley Earth's use of a simple
model fitting the
temperature record for the past 250 years to human CO2 emissions and volcanoes to conclude that the best explanation for the observed warming is greenhouse gas emissions.
In my briefings to the Association of Small Island States in Bali, the 41 Island Nations of the Caribbean, Pacific, and Indian Ocean (and later circulated to all member states), I pointed out that IPCC had seriously and systematically UNDERESTIMATED the extent of climate change, showing that the sensitivity of
temperature and sea level to CO2 clearly shown by the past climate
record in coral reefs, ice cores, and deep sea sediments is orders of magnitude higher than IPCC's
models.
French
records of grape - harvest dates in Burgundy were used to reconstruct spring - summer
temperatures from 1370 to 2003 using a process - based phenology
model developed for the Pinot Noir grape.
Previously, the claim was that satellites (in particular the MSU 2LT
record produced by UAH) showed a global cooling that was not apparent in the surface
temperatures or
model runs.