Sentences with phrase «models predicted slower»

In that case, models predicted slower than actual economic growth in the developing world.

A dynamic eco-evolutionary model predicts slow response of alpine plants to climate warming.

Not exact matches

Suffice it to say that the two new models both explain most of the missing exports we have been talking about — amounting to some $ 30 billion to $ 40 billion — and predict slower export growth in the future than our previous model.

Working has greatly slowed down my progress as well: I'm currently working for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration as part of a team trying to predict snowfall rates from satellite and weather forecast model data.

«It's evidence that agrees with a 2002 computational model that predicted rate of ozone depletion would slow, he says.

Within silico, a computational neural model was made to predict neural activity in slow - wave sleep.

• Clouds form because cold air doesn't hold as much water as warm air • Clouds are made of water vapor • Clouds always predict rain • Rain falls when clouds become too heavy and the rain drips out or bursts the cloud open • Rain comes from holes in clouds, sweating clouds, funnels in clouds, melted clouds • Lightning never strikes the same place twice • Thunder occurs when two clouds collide • Clouds block wind and slow it down • Clouds come from somewhere above the sky • Clouds are made of smoke How does the 5E model facilitate learning?

There might be value in a more generic piece focusing on this kind of tension, which is going to be with us for some time — the slow steady responses predicted by current models, the concern that some observations of faster and bigger changes might actually be the greenhouse gas - forced signal and not just internal variability, the patience required before new observations and better theories / models sort things out.

Their models just seem to be predicting a temporary slow down in the heat level due to previously unforeseen alterations in Atlantic Conveyor.

These new models predict that while warming will slow over the next few years due to internal variability, the warming trend will resume in the long term.

Carbon feedbacks however are very slow - most AR4 models assumed them to be zero for purposes of predicting climate 100 years in advance.

Most models that investigate increasing greenhouse gas scenarios predict that the AMOC will slow down as a result of such forcing (Driesschaert et al., 2007; Meehl et al., 2007).

«Stakeholders who are convinced that future anthropogenic warming will be slower than current models predict will be reassured that the policy will «bite» correspondingly more slowly,» the researchers write, «while the converse is also true for those concerned about unexpectedly rapid warming in the future.»

«Much of our confidence stems from the fact that our model does well at predicting slow changes in ocean heat transport and sea surface temperature in the sub-polar North Atlantic, and these appear to impact the rate of sea ice loss.

Put this all together, and you find that while individual solutions of the climate equations may have predicted the slowed warming of the last few years, that single solution wasn't statistically valid as a projection and so was given only a small weight in the overall model or multi-model means.

Most models that investigate increasing greenhouse gas scenarios predict that the AMOC will slow down as a result of such forcing (Driesschaert et al., 2007; Hodell et al., 2009).

The slowdown in warming was, she added, real, and all the evidence suggested that since 1998, the rate of global warming has been much slower than predicted by computer models — about 1C per century.

There is no reason whatever to suppose that the slow - down is permanent: these things have happened before (e.g. 1950 to 1970), and no - one ever claimed that climate models could predict all these decadal wiggles.»

Intuitively I would expect tropospheric warming to always be a bit slower than surface warming — is that what the science says, and climate models predict?

Stroeve said that current climate models show the AMOC slowing, but not stopping completely, during the 21st century, emphasizing that the predicted changes are nonetheless significant.

And if this process of water changing state, which is pretty much just a process of physics and a bit of chemistry, is so very easy to get wrong — specifically, is so easy to model too conservatively so the models predict wrongly that it will be a very slow process when in fact it seems to be a much faster process — how confident can we be that other models and estimates of processes that involve multiple feedbacks that include chemical and biological interactions as well as physical ones aren't even more wildly inaccurate on the «conservative» side?

A good example is the consensus of chemistry models that projected a slow decline in stratospheric ozone levels in the 1980s, but did not predict the emergence of the Antarctic ozone hole because they all lacked the equations that describe the chemistry that occurs on the surface of ice crystals in cold polar vortex conditions — an «unknown unknown» of the time.

«Development schedule of new 6.1» LCD iPhone slightly behind 6.5» and 5.8» OLED models, but it may enjoy extended longevity into 1H19F, boosting slow season outlook: We predict the 6.1» LCD iPhone will differ from the 6.5» and 5.8» OLED models in terms of certain specs, for reasons of cost / price and product segmentation.