There are a few publishing scientists that strongly disagree with the established consensus that humans are the primary drivers
of modern climate change and yet they seem to find funding without much difficulty.
But to them, we offer the reminder that paleoclimate evidence comprises only one of many independent lines of evidence indicating a primary role of human activity
in modern climate change.
Explicit recognition of citizen science in published papers could promote the communication linkages necessary for broader impacts by helping shift public discourse associated with
modern climate change from controversy to acceptance.
With two independent studies triangulating the onset of the PETM in the 3,000 -4,000-year timeframe, it puts
modern climate change into perspective.
A second, linked rumour was that Aronofsky would replace the sin and judgement message of the story with an environmental tract, and while his pre-flood humanity's mistreatment of creation is a pointed nod
at modern climate change deniers, it doesn't go further than that.
You would be very hard - pushed to find a large number of geologists who would argue that humans are
creating modern climate change because in geology we've seen massive climate changes, we've seen sea levels go up and down like a yoyo.
Science has a good understanding of past climate changes and their causes, and that evidence makes the human cause of
modern climate change all the more clear.
I'm afraid it is very much up to you to unequivocally nail your flag on the post and state that
Yes modern climate change IS manmade.
After describing this, Karlsson asserts that «Thus, the claim that it (
observed modern climate change) is just «all natural» (i.e. no substantial human influence) is falsified by the data.»
In an appearance on the Fox News program Your World with Neil Cavuto, Morano clamed that
modern climate change predictions are failing and that they are akin to «medieval witchcraft, where we used to blame witches for controlling the weather.»
But Veron has described in detail
how modern climate change is on track to change the ocean so drastically that corals and the reefs they build will be driven to extinction faster than in any previous mass extinction event.
Many have credited this article to Roger Revelle, a man described by some as the grandfather of
modern climate change science and whose name woul dhave given the article significantly more credence than Singer's alone.
«Volcanic eruptions drove ancient global warming event: Warming event that took place 56 million years ago led to significant ecological disruption and could shed light
on modern climate change.»
«All the observations show this region is one of those most affected
by modern climate change, and it's predicted to get dryer.
Increasingly, as we found, many scientists no longer even mention the human cause
of modern climate change in their papers.
That long - term data shows that
modern climate change is faster and more acute than anything else in Earth's history.
The findings mean the so - called Paleocene - Eocene thermal maximum, or PETM, can provide clues to the future of
modern climate change.
This is particularly true in areas which tend to experience more pronounced and cumulative impacts of
modern climate change.
This team's discovery also calls attention to the possible effects of
modern climate change, because global warming was the ultimate driver of marine anoxia in the Early Triassic period.
Whether or not African civil wars today can be linked to
modern climate change is the subject of intense debate.
This enterprise will not only help in understanding the nature of
modern climate change, but will permit us to decode the record of past climate changes hidden in tropical glaciers.
Here's the deal: no credible scientists doubt that
modern climate change is largely anthropogenic.
While many climate scientists have come under the withering fire of skeptics, some of the toughest fights have centered around Mann and his research — largely because of a single study that demonstrated that
modern climate change is unprecedented in at least the past millenium of Earth's history.
Zeebe et al (2015) point out that our current climate change, occurring in just a couple of centuries, has no analog in the past 66 million years, which presents a challenge for our ability to predict the long term consequences of
modern climate change.
Scientists have been studying the event because it is seen as an analog, albeit an imperfect one, of
modern climate change.
Note the decreased temperature difference between equator and poles, as also observed and projected under
the modern climate change.
The peer - reviewed scientific literature is teeming with new evidence supporting the skeptical viewpoint that
modern climate changes are neither unprecedented or unusual — nor do they fall outside the range of natural variability.
For example, the United States Enviornmental Protection Agency regulates several pollutants affecting air quality but does not currently regulate carbon dioxide, the primary driver of
modern climate change.